I think we now know who the troll is. You post everywhere and aren't even aware of some basics. what a donkey..e-or...e-oranother example of the shambles our financials are in if it's true
I think we now know who the troll is. You post everywhere and aren't even aware of some basics. what a donkey..e-or...e-oranother example of the shambles our financials are in if it's true
This is the sort of attitude that sees you go all in on a pair of 2s post flop in poker and lose to a flush that's already two cards on the board.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:I guess they like taking a risk. If he is the sort of player that will fire us into the PL or who goes for £30million one day I'd be more than fine with it. It's all about risk as with anything in business.Snowflake Royal wrote:Whether it's good value for his ability or potential is moot. It's whether we should be signing players, particularly young unproven ones on that money at all.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:I'm going to disagree.
On the basis of the performance against Cardiff and his international performances the transfer fee and anything less than 50k a week is an absolute steal and most of us at the time were thinking we got ourselves a bargain.
Of course hindsight is a wonderful thing and his less than convincing performances since have us thinking even 50p a week is too much.
My guess is he will step up to the plate. His errors now are pretty clearly down to rock bottom confidence, not lack of effort or lack of ability.
I'm going to stick my neck out and say that at his age, I think we got ourselves a bargain.
We are a Championship club with income of around £20m a year. We have no business paying anyone over £20k a week. That should be the top end for our handful of proven stars.
This combined with long contracts is half the reason we're a financial basket case.
clear off donkey. you have no idea about anything. have you any idea of reading fc debt levels? go get back on the busSnowflake Royal wrote:This is the sort of attitude that sees you go all in on a pair of 2s post flop in poker and lose to a flush that's already two cards on the board.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:I guess they like taking a risk. If he is the sort of player that will fire us into the PL or who goes for £30million one day I'd be more than fine with it. It's all about risk as with anything in business.Snowflake Royal wrote: Whether it's good value for his ability or potential is moot. It's whether we should be signing players, particularly young unproven ones on that money at all.
We are a Championship club with income of around £20m a year. We have no business paying anyone over £20k a week. That should be the top end for our handful of proven stars.
This combined with long contracts is half the reason we're a financial basket case.
We're constantly on the edge of betting the farm on a long shot. Businesses have risk management for a reason, and this sort of approach should be right in the danger zone, do not do area.
FAKESNOW FAKE PERSONkrapmle wrote:clear off donkey. you have no idea about anything. have you any idea of reading fc debt levels? go get back on the busSnowflake Royal wrote:This is the sort of attitude that sees you go all in on a pair of 2s post flop in poker and lose to a flush that's already two cards on the board.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:
I guess they like taking a risk. If he is the sort of player that will fire us into the PL or who goes for £30million one day I'd be more than fine with it. It's all about risk as with anything in business.
We're constantly on the edge of betting the farm on a long shot. Businesses have risk management for a reason, and this sort of approach should be right in the danger zone, do not do area.
I don't disagree. But these guys have created their millions somehow, while our saviour Madejski and his caution didn't work at *that* well for us, or for him lately.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is the sort of attitude that sees you go all in on a pair of 2s post flop in poker and lose to a flush that's already two cards on the board.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:I guess they like taking a risk. If he is the sort of player that will fire us into the PL or who goes for £30million one day I'd be more than fine with it. It's all about risk as with anything in business.Snowflake Royal wrote: Whether it's good value for his ability or potential is moot. It's whether we should be signing players, particularly young unproven ones on that money at all.
We are a Championship club with income of around £20m a year. We have no business paying anyone over £20k a week. That should be the top end for our handful of proven stars.
This combined with long contracts is half the reason we're a financial basket case.
We're constantly on the edge of betting the farm on a long shot. Businesses have risk management for a reason, and this sort of approach should be right in the danger zone, do not do area.
I was just thinking that it would be funny if Nigel Howe had a browse on HNA and decided to pull the trigger after seeing Brobot’s joke threadWinston Biscuit wrote:Sounding like the pressure Brobot created with this thread could no longer be contained.
You mean apart from the best 20 years of our entire history, a points record, promotion to the top tier for the first time ever and an 8th placed finish?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:I don't disagree. But these guys have created their millions somehow, while our saviour Madejski and his caution didn't work at *that* well for us, or for him lately.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is the sort of attitude that sees you go all in on a pair of 2s post flop in poker and lose to a flush that's already two cards on the board.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:
I guess they like taking a risk. If he is the sort of player that will fire us into the PL or who goes for £30million one day I'd be more than fine with it. It's all about risk as with anything in business.
We're constantly on the edge of betting the farm on a long shot. Businesses have risk management for a reason, and this sort of approach should be right in the danger zone, do not do area.
I do think this is a little tiresome. The people asking for a change, with the exception of trolls/Brobot acting the clown have given pretty clear reasons why they think a change is necessarywindermereROYAL wrote:How long before you`re calling for the head of the new manager? I`ll give it till Christmas.
Exactly. God help our new manager if he starts badly.windermereROYAL wrote:How long before you`re calling for the head of the new manager? I`ll give it till Christmas.
So was he up to the job last season? Surely he would have been found out during a really tough relegation battle that started as soon as he landed the job if he wasn’t up to it.Hound wrote:I do think this is a little tiresome. The people asking for a change, with the exception of trolls/Brobot acting the clown have given pretty clear reasons why they think a change is necessarywindermereROYAL wrote:How long before you`re calling for the head of the new manager? I`ll give it till Christmas.
It’s not a stamping feet tantrum - at least recognise that. We genuinely just don’t think he is up to the job and have tried to explain why
Again, I don't disagree. It worked well to a degree of course. Love the guy. And if we want to be a CHamp club who occasionally has a brief stint in the PL that's fine. But you have since admitted his underinvestment was a reason we didnt stay up and capitalise. I'm not necessarily saying that was the wrong thing to do, just that there are different approaches in business with different rewards. I should know, I own enoughSnowflake Royal wrote:You mean apart from the best 20 years of our entire history, a points record, promotion to the top tier for the first time ever and an 8th placed finish?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:I don't disagree. But these guys have created their millions somehow, while our saviour Madejski and his caution didn't work at *that* well for us, or for him lately.Snowflake Royal wrote: This is the sort of attitude that sees you go all in on a pair of 2s post flop in poker and lose to a flush that's already two cards on the board.
We're constantly on the edge of betting the farm on a long shot. Businesses have risk management for a reason, and this sort of approach should be right in the danger zone, do not do area.
Yeah, didn't work out to well for us that Madejski tenure!
With 5 excellent loanees and a really big feel good factor, barely.Zip wrote:So was he up to the job last season? Surely he would have been found out during a really tough relegation battle that started as soon as he landed the job if he wasn’t up to it.Hound wrote:I do think this is a little tiresome. The people asking for a change, with the exception of trolls/Brobot acting the clown have given pretty clear reasons why they think a change is necessarywindermereROYAL wrote:How long before you`re calling for the head of the new manager? I`ll give it till Christmas.
It’s not a stamping feet tantrum - at least recognise that. We genuinely just don’t think he is up to the job and have tried to explain why
I think I was fairly clear on us spending badly, not under investing.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Again, I don't disagree. It worked well to a degree of course. Love the guy. And if we want to be a CHamp club who occasionally has a brief stint in the PL that's fine. But you have since admitted his underinvestment was a reason we didnt stay up and capitalise. I'm not necessarily saying that was the wrong thing to do, just that there are different approaches in business with different rewards. I should know, I own enoughSnowflake Royal wrote:You mean apart from the best 20 years of our entire history, a points record, promotion to the top tier for the first time ever and an 8th placed finish?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:
I don't disagree. But these guys have created their millions somehow, while our saviour Madejski and his caution didn't work at *that* well for us, or for him lately.
Yeah, didn't work out to well for us that Madejski tenure!
Snowflake Royal wrote:With 5 excellent loanees and a really big feel good factor, barely.Zip wrote:So was he up to the job last season? Surely he would have been found out during a really tough relegation battle that started as soon as he landed the job if he wasn’t up to it.Hound wrote:
I do think this is a little tiresome. The people asking for a change, with the exception of trolls/Brobot acting the clown have given pretty clear reasons why they think a change is necessary
It’s not a stamping feet tantrum - at least recognise that. We genuinely just don’t think he is up to the job and have tried to explain why
Totally different conditions zip. Going in halfway through lifting the mood and just having to raise things a bit, to going in with a proper plan, having serious input on signings. Having to lift the players from your own issues.
Never stayed anywhere long. Never been particularly successful anyway. Never built a successful team.
Yes and that would be a fair timescale. If he can’t turn it around by then fair enough. He has to show that he can change the tactics and the formation and get away from this silly zonal marking.windermereROYAL wrote:Actually don`t believe it`s a done deal, if this meeting is going on I reckon he will get a deadline to turn it around, maybe until the next international break.
That was cringey to read. Was a little sick in my mouth.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Again, I don't disagree. It worked well to a degree of course. Love the guy. And if we want to be a CHamp club who occasionally has a brief stint in the PL that's fine. But you have since admitted his underinvestment was a reason we didnt stay up and capitalise. I'm not necessarily saying that was the wrong thing to do, just that there are different approaches in business with different rewards. I should know, I own enoughSnowflake Royal wrote:You mean apart from the best 20 years of our entire history, a points record, promotion to the top tier for the first time ever and an 8th placed finish?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:
I don't disagree. But these guys have created their millions somehow, while our saviour Madejski and his caution didn't work at *that* well for us, or for him lately.
Yeah, didn't work out to well for us that Madejski tenure!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 157 guests