Yep, looks like the ground sale in itself is ok but they are alleged to have used some creative accounting as to when the sale proceeds were accounted for. Would expect a large points deduction given they have been charged with misconduct and not a breach of FFP rules.Hound wrote:One to keep an eye on: Sheff Weds in big trouble over their ground sale/dodgy accounts
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... ding-rules
I think that is their issue.Hound wrote:I know we're similar - but its quite baffling how they can spend so much money and be so average.
I suppose they had the 2 play off years in a row, but can't really think of any big signings they've made since then. Maybe their wages are huge
Without the sale of the ground they would have missed FFP by about 18m. In 17/18 they were in to lost 37m alone but the sale for the ground to the owner at a cost of 60m, saw a book profit of 38m. This meant they made a profit.Old Man Andrews wrote:I seem to remember there was a period of time where Westwood couldn't play because it would have meant them paying out a huge amount of money to his former club and it would trigger a new deal for the player too. Since the old manager left he has started playing again so I can only assume he has taken them over what is acceptable in terms of FFP.
Perhaps he's the common denominator?URZZZZ wrote:Monk doesn’t seem to get very lucky at his jobs, being at Leeds, the nine point deduction at Birmingham last year and now this
Nah, all 3 clubs have/had batshit crazy owners.John Smith wrote:Perhaps he's the common denominator?URZZZZ wrote:Monk doesn’t seem to get very lucky at his jobs, being at Leeds, the nine point deduction at Birmingham last year and now this
To be fair, he’s no Saggy ‘ArryJohn Smith wrote:Perhaps he's the common denominator?URZZZZ wrote:Monk doesn’t seem to get very lucky at his jobs, being at Leeds, the nine point deduction at Birmingham last year and now this
Seriously? Very strange decision. Still, as with all appointments, give the guy a chance.genome wrote:Cardiff appoint Neil Harris
URZZZZ wrote:The point is Cardiff's style of play under Warnock was coming under scrutiny and they've just replaced him with someone who equally plays a horrible style. May as well have kept Warnock
It's a cheap, horrendous appointment IMO
But I have judged other appointments wrong, Potter at Brighton, Cooper at Swansea, Lampard at Chelsea etc so he may well prove the majority wrong
The problem wasn’t with the style per se but the situation with Warnock. He was leaving at the end and everyone kind of gave up, they needed a new man to come in and freshen things up without changing too much on a footballing level.URZZZZ wrote:The point is Cardiff's style of play under Warnock was coming under scrutiny and they've just replaced him with someone who equally plays a horrible style. May as well have kept Warnock
It's a cheap, horrendous appointment IMO
But I have judged other appointments wrong, Potter at Brighton, Cooper at Swansea, Lampard at Chelsea etc so he may well prove the majority wrong
They should've gone for Gareth Ainsworth, in my opinion.Old Man Andrews wrote:Says a lot about where Cardiff think they are. Seemingly no money and a huge rebuild. Harris has experience working on a tight budget and built a few competitive Millwall sides in his time there. Might be a sensible appointment.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 125 guests