karbota wrote:Ah, a bit unlucky Reading, only one goal in it. Meanwhile, Wrexham have done it again with a 3-0 win over Yeovil, if Parky jumps ship that Jimmy Mullin and Oille Palmer could do a job for us.
karbota wrote:Ah, a bit unlucky Reading, only one goal in it. Meanwhile, Wrexham have done it again with a 3-0 win over Yeovil, if Parky jumps ship that Jimmy Mullin and Oille Palmer could do a job for us.
They did what they needed toRoyal_jimmy wrote:Really? yes they have a good striker but the referee played a big part in that match. How much did they timewaste? how many wrong offsides did we have? what about the penalty shouts? Well organised team but we shouldn't have lost to them.Elm Park Kid wrote:You have to start by giving Eastleigh credit. They're a well organised team with a decent striker - we can't complain about the result.
It's another embarrassment that will worsen our confidence and the mood in the dressing room. I assume that Selles is a dead man walking now and it's just a case of waiting for the takeover to go through.
The only bright spot was the protest. From what I hear, Dai is not exactly busting a gut to get it done, so the more pressure we can create the better.
Holmes one for sure, but not seeing many occasions referee cost us that match, not aware that many offside calls changed the game or were wrong, and as for time wasting, nothing of real note. Referee was not the reason why we lost that match. Apart from all that you have nailed your post.Royal_jimmy wrote:Really? yes they have a good striker but the referee played a big part in that match. How much did they timewaste? how many wrong offsides did we have? what about the penalty shouts? Well organised team but we shouldn't have lost to them.Elm Park Kid wrote:You have to start by giving Eastleigh credit. They're a well organised team with a decent striker - we can't complain about the result.
It's another embarrassment that will worsen our confidence and the mood in the dressing room. I assume that Selles is a dead man walking now and it's just a case of waiting for the takeover to go through.
The only bright spot was the protest. From what I hear, Dai is not exactly busting a gut to get it done, so the more pressure we can create the better.
On the penalty shouts I think unfortunately we marked our card with the ref early on with some fairly pathetic diving.paultheroyal wrote:Holmes one for sure, but not seeing many occasions referee cost us that match, not aware that many offside calls changed the game or were wrong, and as for time wasting, nothing of real note. Referee was not the reason why we lost that match. Apart from all that you have nailed your post.Royal_jimmy wrote:Really? yes they have a good striker but the referee played a big part in that match. How much did they timewaste? how many wrong offsides did we have? what about the penalty shouts? Well organised team but we shouldn't have lost to them.Elm Park Kid wrote:You have to start by giving Eastleigh credit. They're a well organised team with a decent striker - we can't complain about the result.
It's another embarrassment that will worsen our confidence and the mood in the dressing room. I assume that Selles is a dead man walking now and it's just a case of waiting for the takeover to go through.
The only bright spot was the protest. From what I hear, Dai is not exactly busting a gut to get it done, so the more pressure we can create the better.
To be fair, looking at that incident alone, I think they were lucky to get away with it. The one argument you could say it was six of one half a dozen of another as they both had hands on each other, although Quigley (I think it was) does drag him down.Snowflake Royal wrote:On the penalty shouts I think unfortunately we marked our card with the ref early on with some fairly pathetic diving.paultheroyal wrote:Holmes one for sure, but not seeing many occasions referee cost us that match, not aware that many offside calls changed the game or were wrong, and as for time wasting, nothing of real note. Referee was not the reason why we lost that match. Apart from all that you have nailed your post.Royal_jimmy wrote:
Really? yes they have a good striker but the referee played a big part in that match. How much did they timewaste? how many wrong offsides did we have? what about the penalty shouts? Well organised team but we shouldn't have lost to them.
And anyone who has done any homework on Holmes knows he's incredibly handsy in the box.
It's an absolutely certain penalty. But perception plays a big part.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:To be fair, looking at that incident alone, I think they were lucky to get away with it. The one argument you could say it was six of one half a dozen of another as they both had hands on each other, although Quigley (I think it was) does drag him down.Snowflake Royal wrote:On the penalty shouts I think unfortunately we marked our card with the ref early on with some fairly pathetic diving.paultheroyal wrote:
Holmes one for sure, but not seeing many occasions referee cost us that match, not aware that many offside calls changed the game or were wrong, and as for time wasting, nothing of real note. Referee was not the reason why we lost that match. Apart from all that you have nailed your post.
And anyone who has done any homework on Holmes knows he's incredibly handsy in the box.
The absolutely appalling standard of refereeing in this country plays a bigger part imo.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's an absolutely certain penalty. But perception plays a big part.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:To be fair, looking at that incident alone, I think they were lucky to get away with it. The one argument you could say it was six of one half a dozen of another as they both had hands on each other, although Quigley (I think it was) does drag him down.Snowflake Royal wrote: On the penalty shouts I think unfortunately we marked our card with the ref early on with some fairly pathetic diving.
And anyone who has done any homework on Holmes knows he's incredibly handsy in the box.
Professionals not amateurs though. Days are gone of players having other jobs.Hound wrote:
No real need to play a load of kids if we didn’t want to and no surprise they got bullied by an organised bunch of aggressive tough hard working non league players
Mentioned almost two years ago now - just after we’d drawn with Derby and he was bullied for their 90th minute equaliser that he just wasn’t commanding enough and the fact it’s still happening now just isn’t good enoughHound wrote:Holmes seemed far more determined to get his head on the ball when he was being headlocked and dragged to the ground in the opposition box than he did on a basic corner routine in our own box in the 94th min.
Guess always been my frustration with him that he seems to get beaten like that too often for a big lad
I remember seeing him in the Berks and Bucks final against Slough a few years ago and he was being bullied by some journeyman gobshite who was in his ear all game. It's a shame he hasn't appeared to assert himself more and grown from an experience like that.URZZZZ wrote:Mentioned almost two years ago now - just after we’d drawn with Derby and he was bullied for their 90th minute equaliser that he just wasn’t commanding enough and the fact it’s still happening now just isn’t good enoughHound wrote:Holmes seemed far more determined to get his head on the ball when he was being headlocked and dragged to the ground in the opposition box than he did on a basic corner routine in our own box in the 94th min.
Guess always been my frustration with him that he seems to get beaten like that too often for a big lad
It’s a shame because there’s a decent defender in there but the harsh reality (along with McIntyre) is that they’re too easy to bully. Opposition strikers will enjoy playing us and that reflects on how rarely we manage to keep a clean sheet
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Carlos, Downside, Google [Bot], Larry_Parnell and 91 guests