by Tilehurst Mike » 30 Jun 2009 22:43
30 Jun 2009 22:43by Royal Rother » 01 Jul 2009 00:04
01 Jul 2009 00:04The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.Tilehurst Mike wrote:I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
by Royal Rother » 01 Jul 2009 00:08
01 Jul 2009 00:08What you mean is the sooner the club finds a new owner who is prepared to really gamble with his own money and indeed the club's future the better.Tilehurst Mike wrote: ...the sooner the club finds a new owner to show the fans that the club is really striving to get back to the Premiership the better.
There's something pathetically ironic about the conjunction of the first two paragraphs of this post.Tilehurst Mike wrote:An excellent fee and whilst very sorry to see him go, I do think we had seen the best of him and in my view was never the same player since getting injured at Everton away.
It just gallls me to see how much the likes of Wolves, Hull, Stoke and even Burnley are prepared tp spend or have spent to compete and survive hopefully in the Premiership,
We really did waste an opportunity last season by not strengthening the squad in the transfer window. Whilst the idea of seeing a lot of the loaned out Academy lads being given prominant roles in the first eleven next season is somewhat exciting, I would like th club to show some ambition or state what its intentions are for next season. I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
I thank Madjeski for all that he has done, but the sooner the club finds a new owner to show the fans that the club is really striving to get back to the Premiership the better. No wonder season tickets are not being renewed even though I renewed mine from watching for over 45 years.
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jul 2009 08:24
01 Jul 2009 08:24Why should they? The only thing that the accountants and 'financial experts' on HNA can tell us is that the sums in the published accounts add up/balance!Royal Rother wrote:The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.Tilehurst Mike wrote:I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
by Royal Rother » 01 Jul 2009 08:48
01 Jul 2009 08:48Perhaps because it is highly likely they know what they are talking about a damned sight more than those whose doubts are summarised by the expression "something doesn't add up"?RoyalBlue wrote:Why should they?Royal Rother wrote:The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.Tilehurst Mike wrote:I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
Only you (and your acountants) know the full details of what is happening with all of your money, why so different for JM?RoyalBlue wrote:Why should they? The only thing that the accountants and 'financial experts' on HNA can tell us is that the sums in the published accounts add up/balance!Royal Rother wrote:The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.Tilehurst Mike wrote:I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
Only JM and his accountants know the full details of what is happening with all of the money. I'm not for one moment suggesting that anything unlawful is happening, just that the published accounts portray one picture and, like an old painting, if you were able to strip back the layers, you might find something a bit different underneath.
I'm sure there isn't as much money knocking around as some of us would like to believe. However, at the same time, I just have a feeling that times might not be quite as hard as portrayed.
okay i just found an article saying it was £6.5m is that right?gav2085 wrote:does anybody know how much Kevin Doyle actually went for??? also how much of that do you think will actually be given to BR for new players?
'Greed.Sun Tzu wrote:I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
He doesn't HAVE to do anything. He's already said we'll be cutting our cloth, again. I've not seen any comments about what his hopes for RFC are this coming season yet - but if he's saying he wants us to get promoted again, it's just rhetoric imo.SteveRoyal wrote:'Greed.Sun Tzu wrote:I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
He can give him as much as Coppell needed to get us promoted, or as much as Burnley needed.SteveRoyal wrote:'Greed.Sun Tzu wrote:I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
Errrrr..... Fulham perhaps?Sun Tzu wrote:He can give him as much as Coppell needed to get us promoted, or as much as Burnley needed.SteveRoyal wrote:'Greed.Sun Tzu wrote:I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
The obsession with money is crazy, it's one element but no one gets promoted for spending large amounts.
I thought it was their points total that got them promoted. I'll check the league tables for the year they went up and see if they actually finished outside the promotion places.Terminal Boardom wrote:Errrrr..... Fulham perhaps?Sun Tzu wrote:
He can give him as much as Coppell needed to get us promoted, or as much as Burnley needed.
The obsession with money is crazy, it's one element but no one gets promoted for spending large amounts.
by Wax Jacket » 01 Jul 2009 16:58
01 Jul 2009 16:58by Dennis the Butler » 01 Jul 2009 17:27
01 Jul 2009 17:27Royal Lady wrote:He doesn't HAVE to do anything. He's already said we'll be cutting our cloth, again. I've not seen any comments about what his hopes for RFC are this coming season yet - but if he's saying he wants us to get promoted again, it's just rhetoric imo.SteveRoyal wrote:'Greed.Sun Tzu wrote:I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 401 guests