by moo » 31 Jan 2012 22:06
by Mr Angry » 01 Feb 2012 08:27
by Terminal Boardom » 01 Feb 2012 08:48
by Snowball » 01 Feb 2012 08:48
Mr Angry This transfer window has been both encouraging and, to an extent, exciting as it bodes well for the future - in the shape of the reported genuine interest for players of the quality of Wayne Bridge & Keith Andrews (who, if reports are correct, we were close to getting and only lost out to Premiership sides). Surely that lays to rest the perennial whinge of Reading FC being a club that "lacks ambition"??
We were told that there were "limited" funds available, and that has been the case; some decent quality additions (which we wouldn't have been able to afford prior to TSI) rather than the more fanciful expectations of some fans for spending £5M here, and £6M there....and, in my eyes at least, the events of the last week or so have given TSI more credibility as they have kept their word.
The rest of the season is going to be interesting; the play-offs ARE a real possibility (automatic - unless we pull a winning run a la last season out of the hat - is too much to hope for imho), but we could also just miss out; HOWEVER, even if we don't go up, as long as responsible investment in stremgthening the squad is made in the Summer, things for next season look highly promising.
by dogzbollox » 01 Feb 2012 08:51
Friday's Legacyi_kingsley one of the papers had this
Reading are set to offer £3million-plus Simon Church for Brighton striker Craig Mackail-Smith.
playing for brighton tonight, so no.
by Z175 » 01 Feb 2012 09:41
Someone could have Its obviously a blow to lose Kebe to West Ham, but he hasn't been doing it for us anyway this year. Its also a bid odd we haven't recalled McCarthy yet after Federici got his dream move, but I guess Andersen is just on cheaper wages. All in all I'm most pleased we kept Gorkks, despite Newcastle's bid. People talk about ambition, but Madejski showed that when he demanded £2m for Alfie from Brighton. Keeping those two is massive. Now with Ingimarsson back to provide cover along with the guy on loan from Eastleigh, and the Grimbsy lad looking like a prospect, I don't see any reason why our team is that much weaker than pre Jan. Expect Antonio to step up, we might just get 6th yet.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 01 Feb 2012 10:04
by melonhead » 01 Feb 2012 10:08
by Wimb » 01 Feb 2012 10:12
melonhead we needed something different upfront, someone who is proven,with some experience - tick
we needed decent cover for gorkss/pearce and someone who could push them both - tick
we needed an attacking creative midfielder - tick
we signed kebe, and got sheppard too
all you can ask for is that we keep our best players, improve the 1st team and fill obvious gaps in our squad.
tick, tick tickety tick.
by Snowball » 01 Feb 2012 10:55
Harpers So Solid Crew Birmingham will win this division IMHO.
by Mike Hunt » 01 Feb 2012 14:09
Harpers So Solid Crew Birmingham will win this division IMHO.
by rfc2001 » 01 Feb 2012 19:01
by Friday's Legacy » 01 Feb 2012 19:06
Wimbmelonhead we needed something different upfront, someone who is proven,with some experience - tick
we needed decent cover for gorkss/pearce and someone who could push them both - tick
we needed an attacking creative midfielder - tick
we signed kebe, and got sheppard too
all you can ask for is that we keep our best players, improve the 1st team and fill obvious gaps in our squad.
tick, tick tickety tick.
^^^ well said that man/melon
by Mid Sussex Royal » 01 Feb 2012 19:33
by Snowball » 01 Feb 2012 22:31
Mid Sussex Royal My take on it is that West Ham, Cardiff, Southampton and Brum will contest the race for auto promotion (although Southampton could well falter) which leaves 2 spaces for the play-offs with realistically about 8 sides in with a shout.
Middlesboro look the best bet of the rest - I am still not convinced we have enough in the middle of the park and we look suspect at the back against any pace up front in the opposition.
by FiNeRaIn » 01 Feb 2012 22:46
by Snowball » 01 Feb 2012 23:27
FiNeRaIn His point about not having enough in the middle of the park is completely true. I can't remember a centre midfield pairing as weak as we have currently have since the old division two days.
by FiNeRaIn » 01 Feb 2012 23:35
SnowballFiNeRaIn His point about not having enough in the middle of the park is completely true. I can't remember a centre midfield pairing as weak as we have currently have since the old division two days.
Obviously it's REALLY bad, which is why we've won 8 of our last 11 games
by JC » 02 Feb 2012 01:04
Mid Sussex Royal My take on it is that West Ham, Cardiff, Southampton and Brum will contest the race for auto promotion (although Southampton could well falter) which leaves 2 spaces for the play-offs with realistically about 8 sides in with a shout.
Middlesboro look the best bet of the rest - I am still not convinced we have enough in the middle of the park and we look suspect at the back against any pace up front in the opposition.
by Cypry » 02 Feb 2012 06:26
FiNeRaInSnowballFiNeRaIn His point about not having enough in the middle of the park is completely true. I can't remember a centre midfield pairing as weak as we have currently have since the old division two days.
Obviously it's REALLY bad, which is why we've won 8 of our last 11 games
Jesus, you make some good points at times but equally some cretinous ones. How many of those goals were created or scored by our centre mids? If you put me in the team and we happened to fluke a 1-0 win after being hammered and I performed out of my depth as expected, would you come back and say ' well finerain has a 100% win record in the team, we need to start him" no, you wouldn't. Stats don't tell the whole story and you need to stop treating them like they do. You've been told about this 100's of times on the forum.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 300 guests