Royal Rother wrote:Held off Barcelona single handed by the looks of it....
https://youtu.be/DBia7Zgo5pk
Can we sign the last 2 Grenada substitutes in that clip? Surely a winning combination
Royal Rother wrote:Held off Barcelona single handed by the looks of it....
https://youtu.be/DBia7Zgo5pk
retro royal wrote:Sky reporting
READING HAVE ILORI BID ACCEPTED
Reading have had a bid of £3.75m – plus add-ons – accepted by Liverpool for the 23-year-old Portugal U23 centre-back Tiago Ilori.
The decision to leave for the Championship club is now down to the player.
Disappointed at #tinpot watch, where are they all?
IT's not really; their threads only have 10 posts per page.Nameless wrote:Amazed that they have a longer thread than we do about an rumoured signing !
Nameless wrote:Amazed that they have a longer thread than we do about an rumoured signing !
Also bizarre that apparantly we aren't a good side because we have poor 'expected goal' statistics ! Forget the 46 points, we won't go up because some 6th former has invented another irrelevant 'statistic'

It's obviously irrelevant to him... and to me tbh. In fact I'd hazard a guess and say you're in the minority of people who give a shit about a statistic like that.RoyalX wrote:Nameless wrote:Amazed that they have a longer thread than we do about an rumoured signing !
Also bizarre that apparantly we aren't a good side because we have poor 'expected goal' statistics ! Forget the 46 points, we won't go up because some 6th former has invented another irrelevant 'statistic'at you deeming something irrelevant because you personally haven't heard about it or don't understand it.
RoyalX wrote:Nameless wrote:Amazed that they have a longer thread than we do about an rumoured signing !
Also bizarre that apparantly we aren't a good side because we have poor 'expected goal' statistics ! Forget the 46 points, we won't go up because some 6th former has invented another irrelevant 'statistic'at you deeming something irrelevant because you personally haven't heard about it or don't understand it.
I think for the most part, experimental 3-6-1 is pretty solid but the creator does seem religiously attached to it where I feel he should be spending more time looking at why his system doesn't even come close to accurately predicting our results before throwing it to the side as an anomaly, or just outright saying his system says we are riding our luck at the moment. You don't ride your luck for half a season.From Despair To Where? wrote:RoyalX wrote:Nameless wrote:Amazed that they have a longer thread than we do about an rumoured signing !
Also bizarre that apparantly we aren't a good side because we have poor 'expected goal' statistics ! Forget the 46 points, we won't go up because some 6th former has invented another irrelevant 'statistic'at you deeming something irrelevant because you personally haven't heard about it or don't understand it.
But all this "expected goal" nonsense is surely based on a fixed conversion rate of chances which I presume is based on an average. Or, as one of the posters on NSC put it, if we're so shit, how come we're third. The basis of that calculation has got to be a wildly inaccurate assumption.
Just goes to show, the only statistic worth paying attention to is the one in the column headed "Points". Everything else is window dressing.
Both are obviously key factors !RoyalX wrote:Nameless wrote:Amazed that they have a longer thread than we do about an rumoured signing !
Also bizarre that apparantly we aren't a good side because we have poor 'expected goal' statistics ! Forget the 46 points, we won't go up because some 6th former has invented another irrelevant 'statistic'at you deeming something irrelevant because you personally haven't heard about it or don't understand it.
Having watched most of our home games I'd say we dotidus_mi2 wrote:I think for the most part, experimental 3-6-1 is pretty solid but the creator does seem religiously attached to it where I feel he should be spending more time looking at why his system doesn't even come close to accurately predicting our results before throwing it to the side as an anomaly, or just outright saying his system says we are riding our luck at the moment. You don't ride your luck for half a season.From Despair To Where? wrote:RoyalX wrote:
at you deeming something irrelevant because you personally haven't heard about it or don't understand it.
But all this "expected goal" nonsense is surely based on a fixed conversion rate of chances which I presume is based on an average. Or, as one of the posters on NSC put it, if we're so shit, how come we're third. The basis of that calculation has got to be a wildly inaccurate assumption.
Just goes to show, the only statistic worth paying attention to is the one in the column headed "Points". Everything else is window dressing.
Lower West wrote:Coopers days are numbered at RFC. Hasn't good what Stam requires. Reminds me of Flint at Brizzle City. Both very much in the mould of old fashioned English centre backs. Lack all round technical ability.Hitchytwo wrote:I personally and excited about this transfer! (If it goes through). I completely trust stams judgement on the defenders. He must know what a 'hidden gem' of a centerback looks like, based on the Moore and Blackett signing.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 651 guests