by BraisingsteakRoyal » 15 May 2017 14:45
15 May 2017 14:45by Top Flight » 15 May 2017 14:46
15 May 2017 14:46Tiago didn't do much better in that position unfortunately though.UpThePrem wrote:Can't see why Ilori can't start at left back and keep Blackett in the centre. After all he came on and did that when we beat them in the fog re-arranged game.Brum Royal wrote:Obita's pace kept their right back (Fredericks?) in check, not sure any of our other options have that same ability to cope.
by linkenholtroyal » 15 May 2017 14:49
15 May 2017 14:49we've got no bottles just tin pots will that do??Gunny Fishcake wrote:I've a strong feeling this will go to penalties after a draw .....then we'll see who has bottle !
by Sutekh » 15 May 2017 14:59
15 May 2017 14:59genome wrote:Martin Atkinson to ref the match tomorrow.

by CountryRoyal » 15 May 2017 18:01
15 May 2017 18:01This is true, but we held onto the lead despite him, as opposed to because of him. He wasn't much of an upgrade.UpThePrem wrote:Can't see why Ilori can't start at left back and keep Blackett in the centre. After all he came on and did that when we beat them in the fog re-arranged game.Brum Royal wrote:Obita's pace kept their right back (Fredericks?) in check, not sure any of our other options have that same ability to cope.
by andrew1957 » 15 May 2017 19:00
15 May 2017 19:00by Gunny Fishcake » 15 May 2017 19:48
15 May 2017 19:48What about the Wigan game when Nicky Forster scored that last minute winner.....possibly one of the loudest noises ever heard at the Mad StadTop Flight wrote:On the other hand though, you have to think about it tactically as well.Sutekh wrote:One thing Reading need to do though is put right their pretty awful home form in play off games.
Of the 5 previous games played Reading have won just once and drawn two others. In fact it gets worse. In 450 minutes of play off football at home Reading have scored only twice (that works out at 1 goal every 225 minutes) and if you were to take the last 3 minutes of the Wigan game out of the equation then Reading wouldn't have scored any goals at all![]()
On the upside Reading, so far, only fail to make the final when they lose both legs of the semi-final
Tranmere at home. We won the first leg 3-1 so second leg was about shutting up shop and parking the bus.
Wolves. They won the first leg so second leg was about shutting up shop and parking the bus.
Burnley. They won the first leg so we had to chase the game at home. They absorbed the pressure and hit us on the break.
Cardiff was a nervy tense affair.
This game we start honours even. Fulham have to have a go and will leave space. We also have to try and win. Forget about the past. It means nothing tomorrow night. The circumstances are different this time as well.
by Top Flight » 16 May 2017 07:25
16 May 2017 07:25I was just looking at Championship playoff games. But you're right. That game most closely resembles the circumstances that we are in ahead of tonight's game. The first leg was a draw so it was all to play for in the second leg. And we won that time. Only just.Gunny Fishcake wrote:What about the Wigan game when Nicky Forster scored that last minute winner.....possibly one of the loudest noises ever heard at the Mad StadTop Flight wrote:On the other hand though, you have to think about it tactically as well.Sutekh wrote:One thing Reading need to do though is put right their pretty awful home form in play off games.
Of the 5 previous games played Reading have won just once and drawn two others. In fact it gets worse. In 450 minutes of play off football at home Reading have scored only twice (that works out at 1 goal every 225 minutes) and if you were to take the last 3 minutes of the Wigan game out of the equation then Reading wouldn't have scored any goals at all![]()
On the upside Reading, so far, only fail to make the final when they lose both legs of the semi-final
Tranmere at home. We won the first leg 3-1 so second leg was about shutting up shop and parking the bus.
Wolves. They won the first leg so second leg was about shutting up shop and parking the bus.
Burnley. They won the first leg so we had to chase the game at home. They absorbed the pressure and hit us on the break.
Cardiff was a nervy tense affair.
This game we start honours even. Fulham have to have a go and will leave space. We also have to try and win. Forget about the past. It means nothing tomorrow night. The circumstances are different this time as well.
by Royal Ginger » 16 May 2017 09:35
16 May 2017 09:35by CountryRoyal » 16 May 2017 09:40
16 May 2017 09:40Because that other 50% is so so sweet.Royal Ginger wrote:This football thing is supposed to be fun, so why right now am I sat at work feeling nervous and planning to attend an event this evening that will 50/50 cause me misery?
by Top Flight » 16 May 2017 09:40
16 May 2017 09:40I know what you're saying Royal Ginger. I'm feeling extremely stressed this morning.Royal Ginger wrote:This football thing is supposed to be fun, so why right now am I sat at work feeling nervous and planning to attend an event this evening that will 50/50 cause me misery?
by Nameless » 16 May 2017 09:42
16 May 2017 09:42Royal Ginger wrote:This football thing is supposed to be fun, so why right now am I sat at work feeling nervous and planning to attend an event this evening that will 50/50 cause me misery?
by genome » 16 May 2017 10:27
16 May 2017 10:27Top Flight wrote:Last night, I felt really sick. I was ready to throw up. I think it was because of my unhygienic behaviour in the kitchen rather than anything to do with today's game. But it could also be tonight's match that made me ill. I'm feeling better now luckily.
by Davezk » 16 May 2017 11:07
16 May 2017 11:07by windermereROYAL » 16 May 2017 11:23
16 May 2017 11:23by windermereROYAL » 16 May 2017 11:24
16 May 2017 11:24Fulham do need to score if they want to win .Davezk wrote:Why is Stam saying Fulham need to score - it sounds like he is implying about away goals which don't count right?
by NewCorkSeth » 16 May 2017 11:27
16 May 2017 11:27They don't count but I don't get why it's formatted that way. Perhaps they think it opens up play?Davezk wrote:Why is Stam saying Fulham need to score - it sounds like he is implying about away goals which don't count right?
by Winston Biscuit » 16 May 2017 11:27
16 May 2017 11:27because Fulham need to scoreDavezk wrote:Why is Stam saying Fulham need to score
by genome » 16 May 2017 11:45
16 May 2017 11:45I'm thinking Fulham won't fancy themselves on penalties.Davezk wrote:Why is Stam saying Fulham need to score - it sounds like he is implying about away goals which don't count right?
by The Informant » 16 May 2017 11:47
16 May 2017 11:47Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 630 guests