The word legend doesn`t get thrown around easily on here but Longy fits the bill perfectly, he clearly still loves the club and the fans love him, 35 and still supremely fit, he gives everything in every game, he can clearly play until 37/38 and I`m convinced he would stay beyond one year or till the end of his career if he was given the chance.NewCorkSeth wrote:
Other than that I would try play the exact same team. Long, if fit, must start. His performance last match was stellar. I dont understand how he can still win all those aerial duels.
I mean, I hope he retires here. The longer we have him the better.windermereROYAL wrote:The word legend doesn`t get thrown around easily on here but Longy fits the bill perfectly, he clearly still loves the club and the fans love him, 35 and still supremely fit, he gives everything in every game, he can clearly play until 37/38 and I`m convinced he would stay beyond one year or till the end of his career if he was given the chance.NewCorkSeth wrote:
Other than that I would try play the exact same team. Long, if fit, must start. His performance last match was stellar. I dont understand how he can still win all those aerial duels.

I was expecting Tmac at LB in a four. But you might well be rightSnowflake Royal wrote:No Guiness-Walker![]()
Hutch in at CB and and Yiadom right, Hoilett left presumably. Be interesting to see if we can keep up the really good work we did with the shape against Blackburn or it'll go back to the more rigid version in the earlier teams, in which case we might struggle.
One of the two certainly.Brogue wrote:I was expecting Tmac at LB in a four. But you might well be rightSnowflake Royal wrote:No Guiness-Walker![]()
Hutch in at CB and and Yiadom right, Hoilett left presumably. Be interesting to see if we can keep up the really good work we did with the shape against Blackburn or it'll go back to the more rigid version in the earlier teams, in which case we might struggle.
I hope its the former. Don't know why...Snowflake Royal wrote:One of the two certainly.Brogue wrote:I was expecting Tmac at LB in a four. But you might well be rightSnowflake Royal wrote:No Guiness-Walker![]()
Hutch in at CB and and Yiadom right, Hoilett left presumably. Be interesting to see if we can keep up the really good work we did with the shape against Blackburn or it'll go back to the more rigid version in the earlier teams, in which case we might struggle.
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 20 Aug 2022 15:13
20 Aug 2022 15:13Shouldn't be surprised. The standard of refereeing has never been great at this level, but in the past few seasons it's plummeted even further.Snowflake Royal wrote:Nasty knock on Hoilett there. Ref completely uninterested. Fancy that should have been a yellow. Took an age to signal the physio on.
He's not even given a freekick.
I cant watch today, what do you mean by unravelling? Losing the ball a lot?Snowflake Royal wrote:Loum's performance is unravelling.
Hutch plays nasty, but dangerous fk here. But close for a shot.
He's missing some challenges, lost the ball creating a break and tweaked a muscle. Plus Loum sounds a bit like Loom.NewCorkSeth wrote:I cant watch today, what do you mean by unravelling? Losing the ball a lot?Snowflake Royal wrote:Loum's performance is unravelling.
Hutch plays nasty, but dangerous fk here. But close for a shot.
Ahh I see.Snowflake Royal wrote:He's missing some challenges, lost the ball creating a break and tweaked a muscle. Plus Loum sounds a bit like Loom.NewCorkSeth wrote:I cant watch today, what do you mean by unravelling? Losing the ball a lot?Snowflake Royal wrote:Loum's performance is unravelling.
Hutch plays nasty, but dangerous fk here. But close for a shot.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Humpty Jumpshoes and 213 guests