That very much depends on the squad that's available, Physical and mental demands will make it extremely though for any academy boys to be consistent over the course of the entire season.Hound wrote: I think we should be top 10 next year.
Bit harsh, could you really see Ince getting draws against Burnley and Luton? And we might have won Luton without the red card.Hound wrote:Noel has shown nothing to get the role imo. Same form as under Ince, played the youth then binned them again quickly. No real improvement in play other than a bit more energy.
He isn’t ready to be a full time manager.
I think we should be top 10 next year. There’s an awful lot of crap in the division and we’ve still got the core of borderline champ/good L1 players in the squad. I’d be very suprised if we weren’t
Yes - both were playing at 50% and had nothing to play for.Snowflake Royal wrote:Bit harsh, could you really see Ince getting draws against Burnley and Luton? And we might have won Luton without the red card.Hound wrote:Noel has shown nothing to get the role imo. Same form as under Ince, played the youth then binned them again quickly. No real improvement in play other than a bit more energy.
He isn’t ready to be a full time manager.
I think we should be top 10 next year. There’s an awful lot of crap in the division and we’ve still got the core of borderline champ/good L1 players in the squad. I’d be very suprised if we weren’t
Still enough to comfortably beat Ince's negative hoofball.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Yes - both were playing at 50% and had nothing to play for.Snowflake Royal wrote:Bit harsh, could you really see Ince getting draws against Burnley and Luton? And we might have won Luton without the red card.Hound wrote:Noel has shown nothing to get the role imo. Same form as under Ince, played the youth then binned them again quickly. No real improvement in play other than a bit more energy.
He isn’t ready to be a full time manager.
I think we should be top 10 next year. There’s an awful lot of crap in the division and we’ve still got the core of borderline champ/good L1 players in the squad. I’d be very suprised if we weren’t
Not for me, I'd say Hunt has brought minor differences, but not improvements. Instead of just hoofing it, we have a little bit more energy, but just as little quality.Snowflake Royal wrote:Still enough to comfortably beat Ince's negative hoofball.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Yes - both were playing at 50% and had nothing to play for.Snowflake Royal wrote: Bit harsh, could you really see Ince getting draws against Burnley and Luton? And we might have won Luton without the red card.
Yeah, tbf to Ince (and don’t get me wrong he had to go) he got a draw at Bristol and was a minute and some awful defending from one at promotion chasing PNEMid Sussex Royal wrote:Yes - both were playing at 50% and had nothing to play for.Snowflake Royal wrote:Bit harsh, could you really see Ince getting draws against Burnley and Luton? And we might have won Luton without the red card.Hound wrote:Noel has shown nothing to get the role imo. Same form as under Ince, played the youth then binned them again quickly. No real improvement in play other than a bit more energy.
He isn’t ready to be a full time manager.
I think we should be top 10 next year. There’s an awful lot of crap in the division and we’ve still got the core of borderline champ/good L1 players in the squad. I’d be very suprised if we weren’t
If you’re going to to ignore the obvious, then I’ll point out that the other two ex-Man Utd players got us to a surprise play-off final and our best ever finish including record pointswindermereROYAL wrote:O`Shea leading, the other two ex Man U players worked out very well didn`t they, okay so Carrick is doing well but I wouldn`t take the risk.
Al Al Habsi and Kermorgant got us to a fluke Play Off Final and the other one of "the other two" was clearly meant as Ince.Franchise FC wrote:If you’re going to to ignore the obvious, then I’ll point out that the other two ex-Man Utd players got us to a surprise play-off final and our best ever finish including record pointswindermereROYAL wrote:O`Shea leading, the other two ex Man U players worked out very well didn`t they, okay so Carrick is doing well but I wouldn`t take the risk.
Clearly both statements are wrong
Best football we'd played in a long time. Not quite as good as under Pauno but still.windermereROYAL wrote:Don`t let the fact we reached the play-off final cloud your vision, the football was horrible, and so it proved in his 2nd season when teams figured out how to play against us, 7 wins in a calendar year told it`s own sorry story..SCIAG wrote:Coppell and Stam?windermereROYAL wrote:O`Shea leading, the other two ex Man U players worked out very well didn`t they, okay so Carrick is doing well but I wouldn`t take the risk.
Well Hunt isn't Paul Daniels so I'm not sure where you thought he was going to magic any quality from.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Not for me, I'd say Hunt has brought minor differences, but not improvements. Instead of just hoofing it, we have a little bit more energy, but just as little quality.Snowflake Royal wrote:Still enough to comfortably beat Ince's negative hoofball.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:
Yes - both were playing at 50% and had nothing to play for.
You are absolutely insane.SCIAG wrote:Best football we'd played in a long time. Not quite as good as under Pauno but still.windermereROYAL wrote:Don`t let the fact we reached the play-off final cloud your vision, the football was horrible, and so it proved in his 2nd season when teams figured out how to play against us, 7 wins in a calendar year told it`s own sorry story..SCIAG wrote: Coppell and Stam?
Well normally when you change your manager you'd see some sort of improvement, I can't really say that we have seen that. Just seen some differences in Hunt to Ince, but we are still just as bad.Snowflake Royal wrote:Well Hunt isn't Paul Daniels so I'm not sure where you thought he was going to magic any quality from.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Not for me, I'd say Hunt has brought minor differences, but not improvements. Instead of just hoofing it, we have a little bit more energy, but just as little quality.Snowflake Royal wrote: Still enough to comfortably beat Ince's negative hoofball.
Literally 12 months previously with Blackman in the form of his life under Clarke was far better than anything Mr Negative and his passing it around the back for eternity managed.SCIAG wrote:Best football we'd played in a long time. Not quite as good as under Pauno but still.windermereROYAL wrote:Don`t let the fact we reached the play-off final cloud your vision, the football was horrible, and so it proved in his 2nd season when teams figured out how to play against us, 7 wins in a calendar year told it`s own sorry story..SCIAG wrote: Coppell and Stam?
Good shout. Lasted about six or seven games before Tshibola and Quinn got injured.Orion1871 wrote:Literally 12 months previously with Blackman in the form of his life under Clarke was far better than anything Mr Negative and his passing it around the back for eternity managed.SCIAG wrote:Best football we'd played in a long time. Not quite as good as under Pauno but still.windermereROYAL wrote:
Don`t let the fact we reached the play-off final cloud your vision, the football was horrible, and so it proved in his 2nd season when teams figured out how to play against us, 7 wins in a calendar year told it`s own sorry story..
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 716 guests