Agree. The manager is important but the players he's got to work with is more so. And yes, we really need some pace in the side in attacking areas.Fezza wrote:Really well regarded as a coach, I'd almost rather this than Wilder if we're looking to build something. However recruitment is absolutely key with regards to the playing squad. Pace please!
You missed out "is kind to animals".paultheroyal wrote:Wants a project - works a high press - a man manager - swears by fitness.
What's not to like, oh yeah its not Wilder.
But - we are craving a manager, he wants to manage this current shambles, we need to get behind him.
Selles was also extremely pro vaccination, made all the Southampton players have it.andrew1957 wrote:Hate to say it but I pretty much agree with Millsy on this one. Very odd appointment and it feels like a super agent appointment rather than a Bowen appointment and if so will Bowen walk? If that happens we really do need to be concerned as it seems to me as though he is the last beacon of hope for the club. If Bowen goes we could quickly go down a very slippery slope.
Obviously the new bloke might be great but it is a massive risk and such as disappointment after we thought we might just get a proper manager (Wilder) for once rather just another foreigner (Stam, Gomez, Pauno) or failure (Ince, Clement).
Rather have Monica Seles.Sutekh wrote:Rather have Peter Sellers.
Rather have Helles.royal67 wrote:Rather have Monica Seles.Sutekh wrote:Rather have Peter Sellers.
That'll be a challenge with 9 playersRoyal_jimmy wrote:He apparently plays a high press, so like how Barnsley used to play
Play rush goalie?leon wrote:That'll be a challenge with 9 playersRoyal_jimmy wrote:He apparently plays a high press, so like how Barnsley used to play
Spotlight keeper would be more fun.royal67 wrote:Play rush goalie?leon wrote:That'll be a challenge with 9 playersRoyal_jimmy wrote:He apparently plays a high press, so like how Barnsley used to play
I'm not sure many think it's a good move.katweslowski wrote: I have absolutely no idea why any fans think this is good, or a positive move. It's not.
It's cool to be edgy and appear to go against the bleeding obvious.katweslowski wrote:
I have absolutely no idea why any fans think this is good, or a positive move. It's not.
They're holding out for someone with a 12% win ratio.Sutekh wrote:Taking their time to confrim it aren't they? Perhaps he doesn't want the gig either.
You've said it yourself, we're operating at a lower level. What doesn't work for them might work for us. They've just appointed Russell Martin, clearly done for his style of play. Selles doesn't play that way, that might be (one of) the reason(s) as to why they parted ways, alongside Selles' aspirations to be a manager/head coach. The fit of the club matters with a manager alongside their ability.Royal_jimmy wrote:He left Southampton because they wanted to retain him as a coach but he wanted to be a manager. I get we're playing at a lower level now but Southampton clearly don't see him being a great manager. So why should we?
It's clear that just because he's worked at a few European clubs the owner likes him.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Carlos, Downside, Google [Bot], Larry_Parnell and 88 guests