Yeh seemed completely unnecessary. All over them, they've barely got it out of their half. Now watch the momentum shift.Snowflake Royal wrote:Very early subs for Selles. Not sure about this.
Going for the goal, taking off good defensive players for, in theory, more attacking defensive players.
Wing's passing and crossing looks very tired, so a little surprised he's stayed on.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Yeh seemed completely unnecessary. All over them, they've barely got it out of their half. Now watch the momentum shift.Snowflake Royal wrote:Very early subs for Selles. Not sure about this.
Going for the goal, taking off good defensive players for, in theory, more attacking defensive players.
Because Craig is the "easier" decision.Snowflake Royal wrote:Wing's passing and crossing looks very tired, so a little surprised he's stayed on.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Yeh seemed completely unnecessary. All over them, they've barely got it out of their half. Now watch the momentum shift.Snowflake Royal wrote:Very early subs for Selles. Not sure about this.
Going for the goal, taking off good defensive players for, in theory, more attacking defensive players.
If the roles were reversed we'd be saying the equaliser is inevitable.Snowflake Royal wrote:Going to be one of those days where it just doesn’t come off, isn’t it.
Maybe, lots of territory, but almost no actual chances. And we can't keep a clean sheet to save our lives.WestYorksRoyal wrote:If the roles were reversed we'd be saying the equaliser is inevitable.Snowflake Royal wrote:Going to be one of those days where it just doesn’t come off, isn’t it.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Doc, Google [Bot] and 291 guests