What do you want it changed to? - I've got moderator powers so can do it if you can'tWestYorksRoyal wrote:How do I edit the title ?
What do you want it changed to? - I've got moderator powers so can do it if you can'tWestYorksRoyal wrote:How do I edit the title ?
It's fine, I managed to fix it. Originally my auto correct created a phone club thread.Forbury Lion wrote:What do you want it changed to? - I've got moderator powers so can do it if you can'tWestYorksRoyal wrote:How do I edit the title ?
We have Reading City as non League.Forbury Lion wrote:Maybe create a new club anyway, even if Reading FC survives. This town could do with a non-league club (assuming that isn't going to be Reading FC).
Maybe in 50 years time our descendants will be attending the Reading derby in the Premier League, a big six pointer with European Super League qualification up for grabs.
Have they done it up?Ascotexgunner wrote: We have Reading City as non League.
Got a nice little ground
I agree with this - the naivety of the journalists and SBWD etc who are believing the “don’t worry it’s just a short term March hole to fill” is staggering beyond belief.Green wrote:I think you're jumping ahead somewhat. When there is something to contribute to I'll make a decision.Snowflake Royal wrote:My main concern is my money being used for the purpose it was given. Not how well it is used.Green wrote: Agree in that I'd need to have confidence in the new outfit before investing, but for me the bar is somewhat higher than STAR and Nigel f*cking Howe. That lot couldn't organise a piss up in brewery.
If you want a lot better than that, you might as well just say you flat out won't contribute.
(The current "buy more tickets so we can prop up corrupt millionaire Dai" is a no, fwiw)
Armadillo Roadkill wrote:Was just discussing the name of a phoenix club with another supporter.
Is there any reason we couldn't just call it "Reading" with no prefix or suffix?
Of course.Sutekh wrote:Armadillo Roadkill wrote:Was just discussing the name of a phoenix club with another supporter.
Is there any reason we couldn't just call it "Reading" with no prefix or suffix?You'll be wanting the new club to play in blue and white hoops next
I reckon that the record would still stand even without Reading existing.Greatwesternline wrote:Seems the biggest risk to 106 now stems from the club holding the record no longer existing.
Lower leagues don't count. Neither do higher leagues.St Pauli wrote: It’s a bit of a weird record anyway, given that it’s been beaten in lower leagues.
Wtfbiff wrote:Dai Perry did it!
How is it weird? Record points in the championshipSt Pauli wrote:I reckon that the record would still stand even without Reading existing.Greatwesternline wrote:Seems the biggest risk to 106 now stems from the club holding the record no longer existing.
If a 100m runner has the world record and then dies, they don’t lose the record.
It’s a bit of a weird record anyway, given that it’s been beaten in lower leagues.
True but if the Waingels year 9s beat his Olympic record, the Olympic record does lose some of its cachet. Ultimately what makes his Olympic record such an achievement is that he appears to be the fastest man who ever lived on record. If it’s just ‘fastest man in this arbitrary human definition of what we count and don’t count’ it’s a less glamorous record.SCIAG wrote:Lower leagues don't count. Neither do higher leagues.St Pauli wrote: It’s a bit of a weird record anyway, given that it’s been beaten in lower leagues.
If Usain Bolt runs 100m in 9.67 seconds in the Olympics, good for him, but he doesn't hold the Waingels Year 9 100m record.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], windermereROYAL and 66 guests