It was Bielik, one of the players, not the CEO who said thatkatweslowski wrote:Birmingham will falter. I saw their CEO yesterday saying something like "we're too good for League One and will go up" or something. It adds unnecessary pressure and ironically he also said about remaining humble.
Insulting and many clubs will feel provoked by this kind of thing. They'll get the odd draw, some injuries and then the losses will follow around January onwards.
They'll get promoted but on about 95 points.
Thank you - I'll try to edit my original postBrum Royal wrote:It was Bielik, one of the players, not the CEO who said that
Where did they finish the next season in the PL?Mr Angry wrote:What a tosser.
They only lost 3 times; well, thats 50% more games than we lost, and we went 33 games unbeaten at one stage.
And admitting that they eased off after winning promotion shows they weren't that good a team.
I reckon the 106 team would have beaten his Burnley side easily.
+How much cash did they have to spend?Snowflake Royal wrote:Where did they finish the next season in the PL?Mr Angry wrote:What a tosser.
They only lost 3 times; well, thats 50% more games than we lost, and we went 33 games unbeaten at one stage.
And admitting that they eased off after winning promotion shows they weren't that good a team.
I reckon the 106 team would have beaten his Burnley side easily.
How many goals did they score?
How many goals did they concede?
How many >3 goal victories did they have?
Reading won the title that year with just 25 different players featuring in the league - incl. 3 that each just made 1 appearance (Dobson, Golbourne & Osano)South Coast Royal wrote:Am not really bothered.
We know what a fantastic achievement it was and we will always be the first to have reached 106.
Incidentally, I reckon in time the numbers in each division will gradually reduce because the poor loves get a little bit tired playing so much football despite the massive squads and ludicrous upper limit on substitutions so the likelihood of the record being broken will become less and less.
He's always hated us. And the feeling is mutual.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Pretty sure Don Goodman said a couple of years ago the Wolves side from around 2009 was the best
Came here to see if anyone had posted something about this. I'm not sure how you can say something like that when a team loss less games than you, won more games than you, scored more goals than you and conceded less goals than you? I hope he bumps into a member of the 106 squad in his current role and they can politely point out to him how wrong he is. Fool*.Sutekh wrote:Deluded of Wales says
It will be unbelievably tough there in a couple of weeks. I think a draw would be a point gained.LUX wrote:Wycombe![]()
Injury time winner tonight
Is this why he’s been holding up my son’s U7s registration, the bell-end?Sutekh wrote:Deluded of Wales says
"the first X stands for for Craig Bellamy"rabidbee wrote:Is this why he’s been holding up my son’s U7s registration, the bell-end?Sutekh wrote:Deluded of Wales says
(I’m assuming he does the paperwork at the FAW when the national team don’t have a game, because what else does he have to do with his time?)
A cross that went in.LUX wrote:Wycombe![]()
Injury time winner tonight
Yep think there are comparisons with Ian Branfoot's 1985/86 side, very hardworking and get on the right end of the score often through late goals. Would be great to see them out point Wrexham and Brum but don't see them yet as a 106 threatwindermereROYAL wrote:A cross that went in.LUX wrote:Wycombe![]()
Injury time winner tonight
I still think they will blow up at some point, nice to see an unfashionable side up there setting the pace.
It`s a very similar record that they have from our side that won our first 13 games, we hit the wall after Christmas too.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 263 guests