Reading that, I almost want them to win!stealthpapes wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/nov/30/cupcakes-sandro-and-a-gladiators-champ-inside-harborough-before-fa-cup-tie-of-their-lives
"Can Reading have an off-day?"
Reading that, I almost want them to win!stealthpapes wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/nov/30/cupcakes-sandro-and-a-gladiators-champ-inside-harborough-before-fa-cup-tie-of-their-lives
"Can Reading have an off-day?"
Makes me wonder how many cupcakes they offered to get Sandro on board.Snowflake Royal wrote:Reading that, I almost want them to win!stealthpapes wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/nov/30/cupcakes-sandro-and-a-gladiators-champ-inside-harborough-before-fa-cup-tie-of-their-lives
"Can Reading have an off-day?"
Completely agree. We should be putting this to bed early on then hoping for a nice third round tie to bring some money in.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I'll be livid if we mess this up. Imagine the financial help a plumb tie away in a 50k+ stadium which is televised could be. They're 7th tier and we're at home.
I think our first priority has to be to protect what few experienced senior first team players we have. Which means putting out a young, largely untried team and the risk of losing that entails.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Completely agree. We should be putting this to bed early on then hoping for a nice third round tie to bring some money in.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I'll be livid if we mess this up. Imagine the financial help a plumb tie away in a 50k+ stadium which is televised could be. They're 7th tier and we're at home.
So, we will either mess this up or draw stoke away in the third round
Looks like roughly 4,250 sold so far (notwithstanding hospitality and disabled), plus the roughly 3,500 from Harborough.katweslowski wrote:Any update on how ticket sales are doing?
Completely agree with this but even with few senior experienced first team players we still should be winning this.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think our first priority has to be to protect what few experienced senior first team players we have. Which means putting out a young, largely untried team and the risk of losing that entails.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Completely agree. We should be putting this to bed early on then hoping for a nice third round tie to bring some money in.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I'll be livid if we mess this up. Imagine the financial help a plumb tie away in a 50k+ stadium which is televised could be. They're 7th tier and we're at home.
So, we will either mess this up or draw stoke away in the third round
January sales are approaching, Campbell's contract is up soon I believe, and we're back to cashflow issues.
The money would be nice, but an injury to a key player could be crippling andsend us on a loss spiral.
Normally I'd be all up for it, but our squad is just so fragile. We're likely to need a lot more from the likes of Ahmed, Senga, Rushesha, Akande, Sackey, Kanu, Camara and Wareham... so lets give them as much time as we can where we can. And if they lose, ah well. Shit happens. No key injuries. Plus we make Harborough's century.
*If Dean is unavailable: use the other of Kanu or Holzman.Button
Ahmed - Dean* - Holzman/Kanu - Garcia/Dorsett
Rushesha - Spencer - Sackey
Akande - Wareham - Camara
They won their last game 4-1 against Banbury (H), but lost 3-0 at Hitchin and 2-1 at home to Bishop's Stortford.tmesis wrote:Earlier in the week you could get 45/1 on a Harborough victory. Nothing higher than 16/1 now, which is probably still generous.
Yes, even our reserves should win this one, but if they can come and be organised then our young players might find it difficult. Sandro could be something of a distraction for them, rather than a bonus, but you never know. He could make their players raise their game, or just be on a totally different wavelength and disrupt them.
One of the odd things about their cup run is that they aren't really doing that well in the league - 15th in the Southern League Central, and don't have games in hand over anyone either.
Completely disagree. Get the strongest team out, win the game and then use youngsters. Lose this and we have collapse of morale and we’re missing money that is real low hanging fruit. Also, respect the opposition and the competition.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think our first priority has to be to protect what few experienced senior first team players we have. Which means putting out a young, largely untried team and the risk of losing that entails.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Completely agree. We should be putting this to bed early on then hoping for a nice third round tie to bring some money in.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I'll be livid if we mess this up. Imagine the financial help a plumb tie away in a 50k+ stadium which is televised could be. They're 7th tier and we're at home.
So, we will either mess this up or draw stoke away in the third round
January sales are approaching, Campbell's contract is up soon I believe, and we're back to cashflow issues.
The money would be nice, but an injury to a key player could be crippling andsend us on a loss spiral.
Normally I'd be all up for it, but our squad is just so fragile. We're likely to need a lot more from the likes of Ahmed, Senga, Rushesha, Akande, Sackey, Kanu, Camara and Wareham... so lets give them as much time as we can where we can. And if they lose, ah well. Shit happens. No key injuries. Plus we make Harborough's century.
Yes agree with you and have said so previously along with Sutekh and others.Fox Talbot wrote:Completely disagree. Get the strongest team out, win the game and then use youngsters. Lose this and we have collapse of morale and we’re missing money that is real low hanging fruit. Also, respect the opposition and the competition.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think our first priority has to be to protect what few experienced senior first team players we have. Which means putting out a young, largely untried team and the risk of losing that entails.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:
Completely agree. We should be putting this to bed early on then hoping for a nice third round tie to bring some money in.
So, we will either mess this up or draw stoke away in the third round
January sales are approaching, Campbell's contract is up soon I believe, and we're back to cashflow issues.
The money would be nice, but an injury to a key player could be crippling andsend us on a loss spiral.
Normally I'd be all up for it, but our squad is just so fragile. We're likely to need a lot more from the likes of Ahmed, Senga, Rushesha, Akande, Sackey, Kanu, Camara and Wareham... so lets give them as much time as we can where we can. And if they lose, ah well. Shit happens. No key injuries. Plus we make Harborough's century.
Start strong and sub off when able. At the end of the day it's utterly ludicrous the club didn't push the Cambridge game back and give the best chance for both competitions but then is not a surprise given the utter joke way the club has been run for years.South Coast Royal wrote:Yes agree with you and have said so previously along with Sutekh.Fox Talbot wrote:Completely disagree. Get the strongest team out, win the game and then use youngsters. Lose this and we have collapse of morale and we’re missing money that is real low hanging fruit. Also, respect the opposition and the competition.Snowflake Royal wrote: I think our first priority has to be to protect what few experienced senior first team players we have. Which means putting out a young, largely untried team and the risk of losing that entails.
January sales are approaching, Campbell's contract is up soon I believe, and we're back to cashflow issues.
The money would be nice, but an injury to a key player could be crippling andsend us on a loss spiral.
Normally I'd be all up for it, but our squad is just so fragile. We're likely to need a lot more from the likes of Ahmed, Senga, Rushesha, Akande, Sackey, Kanu, Camara and Wareham... so lets give them as much time as we can where we can. And if they lose, ah well. Shit happens. No key injuries. Plus we make Harborough's century.
Start with the strongest and if we get 2-0 up then make the changes.
The money from winning this game and from further progress is very much needed and we should be thankful that the opposition is bringing so many which will help as well.
Just to say, if you're in the area, one of my all-time favourite non-league grounds, one of the finest spur lines in the country and some cracking pubs.Q2 - Stourbridge [Lvl 7] - 4-2 (H)
It’s a shame that none of their fans will be able to buy a program to mark the day .Snowflake Royal wrote:Reading that, I almost want them to win!stealthpapes wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/nov/30/cupcakes-sandro-and-a-gladiators-champ-inside-harborough-before-fa-cup-tie-of-their-lives
"Can Reading have an off-day?"
Sutekh wrote:Start strong and sub off when able. At the end of the day it's utterly ludicrous the club didn't push the Cambridge game back and give the best chance for both competitions but then is not a surprise given the utter joke way the club has been run for years.South Coast Royal wrote:Yes agree with you and have said so previously along with Sutekh.Fox Talbot wrote:
Completely disagree. Get the strongest team out, win the game and then use youngsters. Lose this and we have collapse of morale and we’re missing money that is real low hanging fruit. Also, respect the opposition and the competition.
Start with the strongest and if we get 2-0 up then make the changes.
The money from winning this game and from further progress is very much needed and we should be thankful that the opposition is bringing so many which will help as well.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 217 guests