I agree with the general assessment, though I think it’s a bit on the generous side.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Agree with Andrew, I'd give the window on evidence to date 6 to 7 out of 10.
Williams - excellent
Lane, Doyle, Danny K - good (Danny K reminds me of an early Gilkes, potential who with coaching will improve)
Burn, Fraser, Stevens - OK - and will prob be squad players (including Burn when O'Connor fit)
Jacob, MOM - not convinced yet
O'Connor, Marriott & Ritchie - no rating , but on paper look amongst the better signings.
It is not about one word out of context.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's almost like people who weren't keen on Couhig taking over are deliberately taking one word out of context and ignoring almost everything else said to use it as a stick to beat the new owners with.
Why is this one word more important than everything else said? Why are they not slavishly repeating self-funding? Or frees and loans?
Because it's not really about what expectations the club has set, it's about having something to complain about and not getting the moon on a stick.
Thanks, point proven.West F wrote:It is not about one word out of context.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's almost like people who weren't keen on Couhig taking over are deliberately taking one word out of context and ignoring almost everything else said to use it as a stick to beat the new owners with.
Why is this one word more important than everything else said? Why are they not slavishly repeating self-funding? Or frees and loans?
Because it's not really about what expectations the club has set, it's about having something to complain about and not getting the moon on a stick.
The context was, that in the lead up to the season starting, there were waves of positivity flowing from Dedwood. The moment the season had started and the season tickets tailed off, there were waves of poverty. As soon as the disappointing window comes to an end, I expect the latest spin is about how difficult it was to get good players in.
Never listen to what they are saying to you. Listen to why they are saying it. Always follow the money.
Is this meant to sound profound? Because, basically, salesmen are trying to sell you stuff - this is not a remarkable observation.West F wrote:
Never listen to what they are saying to you. Listen to why they are saying it. Always follow the money.
rabidbee wrote:Is this meant to sound profound? Because, basically, salesmen are trying to sell you stuff - this is not a remarkable observation.West F wrote:
Never listen to what they are saying to you. Listen to why they are saying it. Always follow the money.
Do you also write angry letters to the ASA when your brand of deodorant doesn’t in fact change your life?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 1125 guests