Got done in the first place to even allow Doyle the space.Alan Partridge wrote:How many times Doyle beat Distin?, I can remember 1 and Doyle ran it out for a goal kick!! The only other time, Long won a flick on, Doyle was certain to score and a Mr S Distin went sliding in and stopped a certain goal? Or was I imagining thingsMaguire wrote:ALOL!Royalee wrote:There will be times in a game when even the likes of John Terry and Rio Ferdinand will get beaten to the ball in the way Dickov got that ball threaded through. Dickov is a proven Premiership striker and it's a measure of how much Sonko has come on that he was able to nick in and recover excellently. Distin is supposed to be a decent Premiership defender and look how many times Doyle got through and beat him! I'd rather have Sonko than Distin and that's saying a lot.
Distin is about 7 times as good as Sonko and i'd swap them in a heartbeat.![]()
That wasn't Doyle skinning him though, It was Long winning the flick on header in front of him. I can't quite remember but I'm presuming Dunne was up front trying to nick a goal, wasn't it from their free kick or something? Big hoof and we were 2 v 1.Royalee wrote:Got done in the first place to even allow Doyle the space.Alan Partridge wrote:How many times Doyle beat Distin?, I can remember 1 and Doyle ran it out for a goal kick!! The only other time, Long won a flick on, Doyle was certain to score and a Mr S Distin went sliding in and stopped a certain goal? Or was I imagining thingsMaguire wrote: ALOL!
Distin is about 7 times as good as Sonko and i'd swap them in a heartbeat.![]()
2 chances at the end v 10 men when they were chasing the game. Doyle did as well as he could with the service or lack of that he and Lita got. He worked his balls off and could and probably should have ended up with at least 1 goal. But he hardly had a kick of the ball in the 1st half.papereyes wrote:Dunne or Distin - both were very good last night.
Doyle worked hard but had very little to show for it at the end.
Yeah.....I supposepapereyes wrote:I think that's agreeing with me.
papereyes wrote:I think that's agreeing with me.
why not treat yourself?Huntley & Palmer wrote:There is only one thing to say
RoyaLOLee
The reason that Sonko was immense is that City played to his strengths most of the time (certainly in the last 30 minutes) by playing a big centre forward up front and pumping long balls into the middle. Even when they did get past him they didn't have the pace, allowing him to get back and clear.Alan Partridge wrote:LOL @ those with the blinkers on thinking he was 'immense' last night. At times he was yes and at others would have got punished by decent forwards, thankfully City had none.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], rabidbee and 437 guests