Just because you can't tackle doesn't make you a lesser player than someone who does.BR2 wrote:What I find odd is the cult status of Marek and Bikey.
Neither have played many games for us,both have been dropped and both have obvious weaknesses where one loses concentration and the other can't tackle.
It shows how far we have fallen that these two are now thought by many on here as key players.
Personally I hope that they both stay and are regulars in our side but losing Kitson IMHO is a bigger loss than losing any other player.
Many of the games top passers fall into that category. For us Darren Caskey and Simon Osborn weren't the most frequent tacklers and at an International level I can't remember Glenn Hoddle putting too many tackles in.Gordons Cumming wrote:Just because you can't tackle doesn't make you a lesser player than someone who does.BR2 wrote:What I find odd is the cult status of Marek and Bikey.
Neither have played many games for us,both have been dropped and both have obvious weaknesses where one loses concentration and the other can't tackle.
It shows how far we have fallen that these two are now thought by many on here as key players.
Personally I hope that they both stay and are regulars in our side but losing Kitson IMHO is a bigger loss than losing any other player.
I can name many top players who can't or couldn't tackle.
No argument with either of you about tackling-the problem with Marek is that he tries to tackle and isn't very good at it so ends up getting sent off.Wycombe Royal wrote:Many of the games top passers fall into that category. For us Darren Caskey and Simon Osborn weren't the most frequent tacklers and at an International level I can't remember Glenn Hoddle putting too many tackles in.Gordons Cumming wrote:Just because you can't tackle doesn't make you a lesser player than someone who does.BR2 wrote:What I find odd is the cult status of Marek and Bikey.
Neither have played many games for us,both have been dropped and both have obvious weaknesses where one loses concentration and the other can't tackle.
It shows how far we have fallen that these two are now thought by many on here as key players.
Personally I hope that they both stay and are regulars in our side but losing Kitson IMHO is a bigger loss than losing any other player.
I can name many top players who can't or couldn't tackle.
Scholes. Cantona.BR2 wrote:No argument with either of you about tackling-the problem with Marek is that he tries to tackle and isn't very good at it so ends up getting sent off.Wycombe Royal wrote:Many of the games top passers fall into that category. For us Darren Caskey and Simon Osborn weren't the most frequent tacklers and at an International level I can't remember Glenn Hoddle putting too many tackles in.Gordons Cumming wrote: Just because you can't tackle doesn't make you a lesser player than someone who does.
I can name many top players who can't or couldn't tackle.
All this from your first ever postMegaphone of Destiny wrote:According to today's Times:
"Hull City and Sunderland lead the chase for Andre Bikey,the defender who is valued at around £3 milion and is among the players that Reading are willing to sell"
I agree. Bikey was one of the few positives to come out of those dismal last couple of months.Tommy Youlden's Ears wrote:I really hope that this is bollix. Seemed to me that in those last dreadful months at the end of last season Bikey was one of the few who was up for it. The fact that he' a bit of a loon and very raw makes him great to watch. He's clearly a decent athlete, and if he can take on some decent coaching, this surely means that his value is likely to rise.
Losing Kits was sad, this would be bad. Surely if we need cash we just need to sell Headless Hunt. Not Bikey.
yup, we'd be stupid to sell Bikey. They can have Sonks if they want. I'm not going to watch Sonko concede goals against Doncaster ffs. It's going to be catastrophe for us.Alan Partridge wrote:If Reading sell Bikey then the Sack the Board banner will be out in force v Plymouth
He said he wants to go. Doesn't that count for anything?rfcjoe wrote:I really want Sonks to stay as I can see him being and integral part of our team again. Give the guy a chance peeps. This is his level!
It all depends if he really wants to be here or not. Sonko was immense before he got injured, and would love to see him performing at that level again. Maybe a pre-season will help, but if he is not the palyer he was before the inury, then any money for him would be good.rfcjoe wrote:I really want Sonks to stay as I can see him being and integral part of our team again. Give the guy a chance peeps. This is his level!
Ketchup please.rfcjoe wrote:Sauce?
Your really think that had anything to do with Kitson's transfer? You think, even in Kitson's head, there's the slightest chance of him getting a call-up at Stoke?SCIAG wrote:. Unlike Kitson he doesn't need to impress his national team's manager, because he's already first choice.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests