Pre season is normally around 5 weeks so I’d expect to be w/c 27 June with friendlies of varying types appearing anytime from 2 July onwards.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:When is the first week back for pre-season likely to be this time around with the earlier start?
I'd imagine one or two may sign before pre-season begins whereas others really can leave it until the deadline to sign a new deal as well. Anything in the next month or so really.
So that probably fits relatively nicely with players either signing new deals or not. Only having less than a weeks worth of pre-season is better than potentially leaving a couple of weeks into pre-season though as well.Sutekh wrote:Pre season is normally around 5 weeks so I’d expect to be w/c 27 June with friendlies of varying types appearing anytime from 2 July onwards.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:When is the first week back for pre-season likely to be this time around with the earlier start?
I'd imagine one or two may sign before pre-season begins whereas others really can leave it until the deadline to sign a new deal as well. Anything in the next month or so really.
Yes you can announced signings before the 1st July - clubs are already - Cardiff have already announced 4 for example.blythspartan wrote:Ince said that he wants players in time for preseason so I assume they could start rolling in fairly soon. I believe players are normally contracted/paid by their current clubs up until 30 June so can we announce them prior to 1 July? You’re probably right about lots of announcements during the first week back. If not, it will be a bit worrying.Stranded wrote:So when do we think we'll start to hear if players are re-signing?
Get the feeling June will be a quiet month up until preseason starts then we'll see a flurry of contracts and signings in that first week back.
Again though, like Richards, a victim of too many players for one positionFrom Despair To Where? wrote:Blackett was never as good as Stam thought he was and he's done nothing since to suggest otherwise.
He had that decent spell playing wingback but the moment he got linked to Turkey, he lost interest.
The big irony on here being the debate about do we keep Obita or Blackett with Richards as back up.
Well, he's signed him twice....URZZZZ wrote:Again though, like Richards, a victim of too many players for one positionFrom Despair To Where? wrote:Blackett was never as good as Stam thought he was and he's done nothing since to suggest otherwise.
He had that decent spell playing wingback but the moment he got linked to Turkey, he lost interest.
The big irony on here being the debate about do we keep Obita or Blackett with Richards as back up.
I don’t agree that Stam particularly rated him, he messed him about time and time again in that second season and played a pretty awful midfielder at RB (and a RB at LB) to avoid playing him. Sure, he signed him for Cincinnati but it’s not a particularly high quality league
Yeah though it’s prob a 9/10 with Swift rather than an 8NathStPaul wrote:Think with Wallace you will get a 7 or 8 out of 10 every week where as Swift you'll get an 8/10 followed by a couple of 5/10's. West Brom already have a couple of out and out flair players so I see Wallace as a better fit for them, likely cheaper in terms of wages too. Ultimately I think Swift might end up staying here, the chatter around him seems to have died off.
Not sure they're too good for West Brom. Neither are PL quality. Swift especially is far too inconsistent and too injury prone. WBA or anyone between 10th and 4th is about their level IMO.Hound wrote:Yeah though it’s prob a 9/10 with Swift rather than an 8NathStPaul wrote:Think with Wallace you will get a 7 or 8 out of 10 every week where as Swift you'll get an 8/10 followed by a couple of 5/10's. West Brom already have a couple of out and out flair players so I see Wallace as a better fit for them, likely cheaper in terms of wages too. Ultimately I think Swift might end up staying here, the chatter around him seems to have died off.
Wallace’s fitness record certainly better as well
Both very good champ players who are too good for wba imo
When you see some of the players who have gone up and played in the PL not sure you can say that for sure - you’d probably think the same about players from the likes of Leeds (Liam Cooper for example), Brighton, Brentford among othersPATRIQT wrote:Not sure they're too good for West Brom. Neither are PL quality. Swift especially is far too inconsistent and too injury prone. WBA or anyone between 10th and 4th is about their level IMO.Hound wrote:Yeah though it’s prob a 9/10 with Swift rather than an 8NathStPaul wrote:Think with Wallace you will get a 7 or 8 out of 10 every week where as Swift you'll get an 8/10 followed by a couple of 5/10's. West Brom already have a couple of out and out flair players so I see Wallace as a better fit for them, likely cheaper in terms of wages too. Ultimately I think Swift might end up staying here, the chatter around him seems to have died off.
Wallace’s fitness record certainly better as well
Both very good champ players who are too good for wba imo
Puscas' wages will certainly not be allocated to Swift's to keep him signed on.paultheroyal wrote:Hopefully Pisa get promoted, Puscas deal gets done, wages reallocated, Swift stays, outstanding first half of the season, sold for £20million in January.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Bing [Bot], Cooper17, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Nick Shorey my Lord!, WestYorksRoyal and 386 guests