Wimb wrote:
Top, top Gif.
Wimb wrote:
Certain operating parameters are dictated to them - London Midland desperately want to run longer trains from Liverpool to Euston but for whatever reason they're currently limited to 4 car sets despite all calling points being able to accommodate far more. I think it might be something to do with the maximum length of train that can be safely "self dispatched" by the train manager without having to rely on station staff or somethinglikethat.Green wrote:If there's one thing I've learnt about train companies, it's that they seem to derive some kind of perverse pleasure in running as few carriages as possible (probably as few as they're contractually obliged to) So when travelling off peak you're as crammed in as in the rush hour on some routes.
by Winchester Royal » 06 Jan 2014 17:26
06 Jan 2014 17:26Bottom line is I'd rather it was built and we can moan about how shit the service is and how you might as well walk, rather than it not being there at all.Winchester Royal wrote:Problem is, Falmer station is right next to the ground, so by building a station at Green Park, you wouldn't be achieving anything at all similar. Green Park and Madejski would be about the same distance as between Reading West and Elm Park. It's really not going to be that good if it gets it's built.
Dave-Royal wrote:Green park will be build won't be ready by 3 years
by Royal Biscuitman » 08 Jul 2014 14:35
08 Jul 2014 14:35er.. as opposed to the fast services we currently have?WoodleyRoyal wrote:and Network Rail will explore the introduction of semi-fast services between Reading and London.
I would guess they mean on the Reading-Waterloo lineRoyal Biscuitman wrote:er.. as opposed to the fast services we currently have?WoodleyRoyal wrote:and Network Rail will explore the introduction of semi-fast services between Reading and London.
by West Stand Man » 08 Jul 2014 20:41
08 Jul 2014 20:41Semi-fast strikes me as a bit indulgent.West Stand Man wrote:Semi-fast as opposed to slow or fast. There is a slow train that stops at every station, a fast train that stops only when it gets to London. The semi- fast is a lag way house.
I would guess they mean cross rail services (which are currently all stations affairs).tmesis wrote:I would guess they mean on the Reading-Waterloo lineRoyal Biscuitman wrote:er.. as opposed to the fast services we currently have?WoodleyRoyal wrote:and Network Rail will explore the introduction of semi-fast services between Reading and London.
by Royal Biscuitman » 09 Jul 2014 17:45
09 Jul 2014 17:45Shorter train = less fuel used, less train to clean = money saved.EPR2.0 wrote:Certain operating parameters are dictated to them - London Midland desperately want to run longer trains from Liverpool to Euston but for whatever reason they're currently limited to 4 car sets despite all calling points being able to accommodate far more. I think it might be something to do with the maximum length of train that can be safely "self dispatched" by the train manager without having to rely on station staff or somethinglikethat.Green wrote:If there's one thing I've learnt about train companies, it's that they seem to derive some kind of perverse pleasure in running as few carriages as possible (probably as few as they're contractually obliged to) So when travelling off peak you're as crammed in as in the rush hour on some routes.
Really?Royal Ginger wrote:At least the bus queue is quite quick and constantly moving
I've never left a game early, but walk with purpose back towards the bus and usually sit in the North Stand. I usually only queue for 5 or 6 minutes tops. 10-12 if I'm in the South.bobby1413 wrote:Really?Royal Ginger wrote:At least the bus queue is quite quick and constantly moving
Getting to the ground is OK. But after the match (if you stay till the end), you wait in a huge queue with no buses as they've all gone to town. You then wait for them to come back.
Or, they only open one bus so it takes bloody ages to get on.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests