I haven't a clue what you're on aboutAlan Partridge wrote:ROFLeading FC CaLOLendar unveiLOLing
I haven't a clue what you're on aboutAlan Partridge wrote:ROFLeading FC CaLOLendar unveiLOLing
psychological sales pitch to get even more money out of us ........... huh?URZZ wrote:Very 'clever' designing IMHO, not for us of course but it's clearly designed to look shit without getting a number or so on the back of it.
Yup.dogzbollox wrote:psychological sales pitch to get even more money out of us ........... huh?URZZ wrote:Very 'clever' designing IMHO, not for us of course but it's clearly designed to look shit without getting a number or so on the back of it.
Ian Royal wrote:Back ruins it. Superb from the front, Leeds from the back. I don't mind a back panel, but I'm not happy about completely blank.
Pleased with shorts though.
Oh and Kes, throw enough shit at the screen and some of it will stick. It's not hard when all the kits are templated and we release ours late. If you want someone to believe you, post just the one prediction and nothing else. Or alternatively just feck off you tedious little munchkin.
other thing is can't put a name on it until 1st Sep......dunno who's still gonna be thereURZZ wrote:Yup.dogzbollox wrote:psychological sales pitch to get even more money out of us ........... huh?URZZ wrote:Very 'clever' designing IMHO, not for us of course but it's clearly designed to look shit without getting a number or so on the back of it.
SpaceCruiser wrote:Club policies
Agree totally mate.@sonkimarsson wrote:Such a shame there's no hoops whatsoever on the back! Surely they could have had the 1 or 2 bottom hoops continued round...would have been plenty of room for names and numbers imo.
Lol @ JD ruining RFC plans!! I think the complete white back is better than a panel although full hoops would be better! I shall be purchasingRG30 wrote:http://t.co/mAM9CQi

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests