Decent from Nunez, some record that. Surprised Trent dont take them. Cant see Salah giving them up on his return though unless asked to.Sanguine wrote:Just read that Darwin Nunez has taken 12 penalties in his career and scored them all. Mac Allister 10 of 11. Szoboszlai 16 of 17. Which makes it even weirder that Klopp has persisted with Salah, who has now missed 4 of his last 9, as Liverpool's penalty taker. If they do get a penalty whilst Salah is on AFCON, wonder if he might lose them for good.
Not every instance is quite so clear cut. Where do you draw the line between what's clear and what isn't?BRO_BOT wrote:What about when they lightly get brushed on the face and throw themselves to the floor?Dirk Gently wrote:That's so massively subjective it's a real can of worms - even before VAR gets involved. What if a player legitimately injures themselves in a tackle but not from the contact (e.g. pulls a muscle etc)? The inevitable result of asking referees to make an instant judgement on whether a player is injured or not is a referee booking a player for feigning injury and then they're carried off of a stretcher and miss the next x matches from the injury that the referee decided didn't exist.Winston Biscuit wrote:the chat around the game seems to focus so much on 'but is there contact?' which afair was never what fouls were about.
as an aside, I would like to see yellow cards introduced for players who dive/exaggerate things but have still been fouled. Feigning injury is feigning injury.
Would just make things so much harder for referees.
Yeah, I was thinking that even as I was typingDirk Gently wrote:Not every instance is quite so clear cut. Where do you draw the line between what's clear and what isn't?BRO_BOT wrote:What about when they lightly get brushed on the face and throw themselves to the floor?Dirk Gently wrote:
That's so massively subjective it's a real can of worms - even before VAR gets involved. What if a player legitimately injures themselves in a tackle but not from the contact (e.g. pulls a muscle etc)? The inevitable result of asking referees to make an instant judgement on whether a player is injured or not is a referee booking a player for feigning injury and then they're carried off of a stretcher and miss the next x matches from the injury that the referee decided didn't exist.
Would just make things so much harder for referees.
The reality is it's almost impossible to draw up laws that work for such subjective things.
I don't like it.Winston Biscuit wrote:stick with me on this one. What if they are issued before the game to everyone, and then if you behalf well you get it taken away after full time?
Not sure on that one but some form of citing system similar to rugby could work i.e. a player is sanctioned for something missed at the time after the event. Could include retrospective red/yellow cards.paultheroyal wrote:with all the technology available now - yellow cards should be issued after the game once reviewed for clear diving incidents.
Thats kind of where i am going with this...Stranded wrote:Not sure on that one but some form of citing system similar to rugby could work i.e. a player is sanctioned for something missed at the time after the event. Could include retrospective red/yellow cards.paultheroyal wrote:with all the technology available now - yellow cards should be issued after the game once reviewed for clear diving incidents.
You are assessed all the time, even through the pyramid system there would be an assessor at most games. Every EFL and Premier League game is assessed. If their performance score average at certain points of the season are low they will be demoted or put on warning and if high performing put forward for promotion. High performing officials would always get the top games.Sanguine wrote:As a ref, paul, how would you feel about your performance being scrutinised to that extent, and indeed, changed?
I'd be all for a procedure like in rugby - and football desperately needs a review system that applies to yellow cards resulting in reds. Diogo Jota's for example, where his first booking at Spurs was given when Udogie kicked his own feet.
But referees and PGMOL are so wedded to a relative lack of accountability.
And leading to greater visibility of how utterly incompetent referees can be sometimes.paultheroyal wrote:You are assessed all the time, even through the pyramid system there would be an assessor at most games. Every EFL and Premier League game is assessed. If their performance score average at certain points of the season are low they will be demoted or put on warning and if high performing put forward for promotion. High performing officials would always get the top games.Sanguine wrote:As a ref, paul, how would you feel about your performance being scrutinised to that extent, and indeed, changed?
I'd be all for a procedure like in rugby - and football desperately needs a review system that applies to yellow cards resulting in reds. Diogo Jota's for example, where his first booking at Spurs was given when Udogie kicked his own feet.
But referees and PGMOL are so wedded to a relative lack of accountability.
As even commented on here, refs get decisions wrong but people can see how that can happen. Nothing has changed much in football other than the advanced technology leading to greater scrutiny.
Or get a tap on the hip and throw themselves to the floor clutching their face.BRO_BOT wrote:What about when they lightly get brushed on the face and throw themselves to the floor?Dirk Gently wrote:That's so massively subjective it's a real can of worms - even before VAR gets involved. What if a player legitimately injures themselves in a tackle but not from the contact (e.g. pulls a muscle etc)? The inevitable result of asking referees to make an instant judgement on whether a player is injured or not is a referee booking a player for feigning injury and then they're carried off of a stretcher and miss the next x matches from the injury that the referee decided didn't exist.Winston Biscuit wrote:the chat around the game seems to focus so much on 'but is there contact?' which afair was never what fouls were about.
as an aside, I would like to see yellow cards introduced for players who dive/exaggerate things but have still been fouled. Feigning injury is feigning injury.
Would just make things so much harder for referees.
I would agree with Paul's suggestion if refs weren't seemingly incapable of interpreting slow motion footage with the understanding that being in slow motion changes how things appear.Stranded wrote:Not sure on that one but some form of citing system similar to rugby could work i.e. a player is sanctioned for something missed at the time after the event. Could include retrospective red/yellow cards.paultheroyal wrote:with all the technology available now - yellow cards should be issued after the game once reviewed for clear diving incidents.
He's 44 nowWinston Biscuit wrote:Pascal Chimbonda has been given a 5 match touchline ban as manager of Skelmersdale Utd...so has registered himself as a player instead
Kit clash, who OK'd thisWinston Biscuit wrote:Never heard of their being much concern around a tyne-tees derby before, but for some reason they are really planning this like a military operation to avoid trouble
All Newcastle fans had to be on coaches arranged by the club departing at 9:30am and the turnstiles opened at 10am for them
It's on ITV at lunchtime. Quite looking forward to watching it tbh
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests