It's not a hoop if it's not going around the back aswell is it?@sonkimarsson wrote:Such a shame there's no hoops whatsoever on the back! Surely they could have had the 1 or 2 bottom hoops continued round...would have been plenty of room for names and numbers imo.
The Puma contract is a different kit each year.royalsroyalsroyals92 wrote: Also, why have we gone away from doing one shirt every 2 years? 1 each year is quite costly, although i spose as i couldnt afford a season ticket this year i do have some spare funds =/
Gordons Cumming wrote:It's not a hoop if it's not going around the back aswell is it?@sonkimarsson wrote:Such a shame there's no hoops whatsoever on the back! Surely they could have had the 1 or 2 bottom hoops continued round...would have been plenty of room for names and numbers imo.
What we have is stripes.
I like it!@sonkimarsson wrote:Such a shame there's no hoops whatsoever on the back! Surely they could have had the 1 or 2 bottom hoops continued round...would have been plenty of room for names and numbers imo.
Up or down, left to right, right to leftleicsRoyal wrote:Gordons Cumming wrote:It's not a hoop if it's not going around the back aswell is it?@sonkimarsson wrote:Such a shame there's no hoops whatsoever on the back! Surely they could have had the 1 or 2 bottom hoops continued round...would have been plenty of room for names and numbers imo.
What we have is stripes.
Don't stripes go downwards?
Just hold on for 9 months and you'll be able to pick it up for a tenner before the next shirt is released...Wycombe Royal wrote:I haven't bought a RFC shirt for years, but I have to say I am seriously tempted by this effort........
^^ this.cmonurz wrote:Great from the front, but why oh why can't we just have hoops? I don't get it. Others do it, why not Reading?
That was my thought, actually.Wycombe Royal wrote:I haven't bought a RFC shirt for years, but I have to say I am seriously tempted by this effort........
chilipepper91 wrote:The front is definitely one of the best kits I've seen us have. The back ruins everything about it.
Valid point but that's being far too technical for my liking!!Gordons Cumming wrote:It's not a hoop if it's not going around the back aswell is it?@sonkimarsson wrote:Such a shame there's no hoops whatsoever on the back! Surely they could have had the 1 or 2 bottom hoops continued round...would have been plenty of room for names and numbers imo.
What we have is stripes.
Svlad Cjelli wrote:That was my thought, actually.Wycombe Royal wrote:I haven't bought a RFC shirt for years, but I have to say I am seriously tempted by this effort........
Well 'thanks for the money can we make your name a bit smaller?' isn't a great sell to Waitrose really.Barry the bird boggler wrote:The size of the sponsor's name is a bit OTT though...
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 93 guests