Pre VAR no-one would have complained at the goal standing. Gutted for Covgenome wrote:VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
City didn’t look great yesterdayWestYorksRoyal wrote:They're barely celebrating. They're embarrassed, as they should be. Saved by a 1mm VAR call.
City will smash them.
Now Forest have thrown their toys out of the pram again, I wonder if the PL will take further action against them.Nottingham Forest tweeted wrote:
Three extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
3:37 PM · Apr 21, 2024 · 21.7M Views
Fcuk'emJohn Madejski's Wallet wrote:Pre VAR no-one would have complained at the goal standing. Gutted for Covgenome wrote:VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
It’s a difficult argument to present from a logical perspective because, yeah, I suppose the right decision was reached, but it’s just so against the passion and emotion of the game. Just a total buzzkill. Robbed of an iconic FA Cup moment that Coventry fans would be telling their grandchildren about because of 1 inch. It’s so so shit.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Pre VAR no-one would have complained at the goal standing. Gutted for Covgenome wrote:VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
It’s dreadful. Always has been and always will begenome wrote:VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
It would have been an injustice if United had gone outURZZZZ wrote:It’s dreadful. Always has been and always will begenome wrote:VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
But but but it eliminates controversy and helps us come to the right decision!
I’m convinced if that goal goes in at the other end and it’s not disallowed
https://www.specsavers.co.uk/Ascotexgunner wrote:I still can't see the offside bit? It still looks level to me.
Of course he would as it was miles off!WestYorksRoyal wrote:Pre VAR, they used to talk about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team for tight calls, which this definitely was.
But similarly, linesmen are taught to leave their flags down now as VAR can check afterwards, so perhaps he would have flagged without VAR.
What are you doing? Trolling and celebrating on a Reading FC forum after one of the most embarrassing SF wins of all time?BRO_BOT wrote:Of course he would as it was miles off!WestYorksRoyal wrote:Pre VAR, they used to talk about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team for tight calls, which this definitely was.
But similarly, linesmen are taught to leave their flags down now as VAR can check afterwards, so perhaps he would have flagged without VAR.
WestYorksRoyal wrote:What are you doing? Trolling and celebrating on a Reading FC forum after one of the most embarrassing SF wins of all time?BRO_BOT wrote:Of course he would as it was miles off!WestYorksRoyal wrote:Pre VAR, they used to talk about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team for tight calls, which this definitely was.
But similarly, linesmen are taught to leave their flags down now as VAR can check afterwards, so perhaps he would have flagged without VAR.
Those options likely to be some fairly hot water, given they've basically accused the VAR ref of being corrupt.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Lol.Three extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
Yeah that's outrageous. Hopefully a huge fine and their club account banned from social media posting.Snowflake Royal wrote:Those options likely to be some fairly hot water, given they've basically accused the VAR ref of being corrupt.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Lol.Three extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests