Pearce ban overturned

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Ian Royal » 13 Feb 2014 13:22

melonhead if you grab a shirt lightly and the man waits half a second before pretending to be tripped? is that still a foul?

Yes. Because the player has been impeeded. The dive happens because refs give virtually nothing unless you go to ground. The fact is Pearce tugged his shirt when Afobe had beaten him. Penalty, end of. Whether its always given, often given or rarely given doesn't stop it being a foul.

User avatar
John Madejski's Wallet
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 27978
Joined: 10 Apr 2005 00:22
Location: Anyone who lives within their means shows a serious lack of imagination

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by John Madejski's Wallet » 13 Feb 2014 13:30

Ian Royal
melonhead if you grab a shirt lightly and the man waits half a second before pretending to be tripped? is that still a foul?

Yes. Because the player has been impeeded. The dive happens because refs give virtually nothing unless you go to ground. The fact is Pearce tugged his shirt when Afobe had beaten him. Penalty, end of. Whether its always given, often given or rarely given doesn't stop it being a foul.


A tug of the shirt is only a foul if it impedes the player. I'm pretty sure the rules don't say you're not allowed to touch someone

This "there was contact so I had every right to go down" mentality that is given by the 'pundits' on MotD and by fans across the country is just utter crap

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by melonhead » 13 Feb 2014 13:58

Ian Royal
melonhead if you grab a shirt lightly and the man waits half a second before pretending to be tripped? is that still a foul?

Yes. Because the player has been impeeded. The dive happens because refs give virtually nothing unless you go to ground. The fact is Pearce tugged his shirt when Afobe had beaten him. Penalty, end of. Whether its always given, often given or rarely given doesn't stop it being a foul.


tug didnt affect him at all. hence why he then felt the need to go down like hed been tripped

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11968
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by RoyalBlue » 13 Feb 2014 14:17

floyd__streete I can confirm that following the upheld appeal which followed my swipe at Adkins for excuse-making, I will be serving a 1 match ban for the QPR match and will not be attending within 60 miles of Loftus Road.


I'd heard that Nigel Adkins was very keen that you do visit Loftus Road on Sunday, in order that you can drop off his new car.

Crotts
Member
Posts: 43
Joined: 24 Jul 2012 12:31

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Crotts » 13 Feb 2014 15:19

[/URL]

Can we swap shirts now please ? !!


User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by melonhead » 13 Feb 2014 15:20

meh. looks worse in a static pic

Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Gordons Cumming » 13 Feb 2014 16:07

From Pearce's comments it seems he's not arguing that it was a foul and penalty.

"The manager could see on the video evidence what happened and it was clear I wasn't the last man, so I'm pleased he decided to appeal. It's rare that the FA go against the referee so I thank them."

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Ian Royal » 13 Feb 2014 16:37

John Madejski's Wallet
Ian Royal
melonhead if you grab a shirt lightly and the man waits half a second before pretending to be tripped? is that still a foul?

Yes. Because the player has been impeeded. The dive happens because refs give virtually nothing unless you go to ground. The fact is Pearce tugged his shirt when Afobe had beaten him. Penalty, end of. Whether its always given, often given or rarely given doesn't stop it being a foul.


A tug of the shirt is only a foul if it impedes the player. I'm pretty sure the rules don't say you're not allowed to touch someone

This "there was contact so I had every right to go down" mentality that is given by the 'pundits' on MotD and by fans across the country is just utter crap

I've never agreed with that mentality. Nor did I say touching involves a foul. Pearce pulled his shirt as he was trying to run away from him. That's impeded him accelerating. It's minimal, but why the oxf*rd are you pulling a shirt in the first place? That's right, because it gives you an advantage and its clearly fouling.

There would be much less diving, if refs didn't make players have to do it to get a decision by almost never giving a foul unless they hit the dirt.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by melonhead » 13 Feb 2014 16:47

Gordons Cumming From Pearce's comments it seems he's not arguing that it was a foul and penalty.

"The manager could see on the video evidence what happened and it was clear I wasn't the last man, so I'm pleased he decided to appeal. It's rare that the FA go against the referee so I thank them."



s what i said at the time, so im glad he agrees.


still reckon the foul is much softer than i first thought from the north stand.
and the blokes still dived


User avatar
John Madejski's Wallet
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 27978
Joined: 10 Apr 2005 00:22
Location: Anyone who lives within their means shows a serious lack of imagination

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by John Madejski's Wallet » 13 Feb 2014 17:59

Still a stupid pen to give away, and am a bit gutted as was looking forward to seeing Hector get a run out (though Günter would probably have been there)

Loyal royal 247
Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 19 Jan 2014 13:24
Location: BRACKNELL

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Loyal royal 247 » 13 Feb 2014 21:39

It's a big disappointment that it was overturned because he is awful

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by sandman » 13 Feb 2014 21:53

No, he's not. One of the best defenders in the league and best of all he's a product of our academy set up.

People just want to hate on him because he did what any professional would and should do and looked at his options rather than just signing the first bit of paper that RFC shoved in his face.

The Real Sandhurst Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2161
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 10:06
Location: Sandhurst

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 14 Feb 2014 07:13

Loyal royal 247 wrote: It's a big disappointment that it was overturned because he is awful


You have a short memory.... Pearce won Player of the Season for Reading in the 2011–12 which was the season we won the Championship.


User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6684
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Wycombe Royal » 14 Feb 2014 10:08

People seem to think he is rubbish because he is slow. Well there are many top defenders in the world who have the same pace as Pearce, but like Pearce, they make up for that lack of pace in other areas of their game.

Occasionally he gets shown up by a quick player and he struggles against them, but if he didn't he would be playing regularly in the Prem and not for Reading.

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7403
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Royal Ginger » 14 Feb 2014 10:42

He's not having a very good season,and certainly doesn't seem to be playing as well as two seasons ago. Probably because he doesn't have Jem and Legs in front of him who really shouldn't be underestimated as a defensive midfield pairing.

We've all thought quite highly of Pearce at times, but there's a couple of issues creeping into his game. He isn't too slow in a straight line, he just really seems to struggle to turn round very quickly and he's got the issues with the ball at his feet that we've all seen. His heading used to be excellent, but he's started to get his hands/arms all over whoever he's jumping with.

He's not bad, but he's hardly in the form of his life. At the moment Gorkss is making him look second best by quite a way.

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by NewCorkSeth » 14 Feb 2014 11:10

Most teams in the championship would kill for a CB of Pearce, Morro or Gorkks quality.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2014 18:47

Cracking player. I don't think his pace is particularly a problem, although obviously he could be faster. His major weakness is that he's not got a lot of poise. He's a bit clumsy, sort of lumbering and too easily caught off balance.

You don't notice it too much because he's great when he's set and he's got a pretty good footballing brain on him so he usually is well prepared.

His problems are when attackers surprise him and so take him off balance. And there's that awkward ball where its dropping and it's not ideal to attack it in the air or let it bounce and come on to you. It's in the uncertainty zone. That's when he really struggles.

The Real Sandhurst Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2161
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 10:06
Location: Sandhurst

Re: Pearce ban overturned

by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 17 Feb 2014 07:22

Two goals in three games for Pearce plus a very solid performance against a top six side (QPR)in the Championship.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jammy Dodger, WestYorksRoyal and 127 guests

It is currently 05 Aug 2025 20:38