I think you are getting a little over excited. to give Samuel 10 is to say he was faultless. he was good i agree. but nowhere near a 10. and Beerens continues to disappoint given his high profile, but he just IMHO.Jack Celliers wrote:Lower West wrote:Beerens 8 best game for a whileRoyal Ginger wrote:Eh? Midfield!? Really? Swift, Van Den Berg, Evans, Williams, Quinn and Kelly? I'm really not sure what more we could ask for.
Samuels 10 easily the best thing that has happened to this football club in a decade
This is not surprisingMuskrat wrote:No there wasn't anybody at all in about 6 rows in front of me.
Who is getting carried away though? Most frequent contributors on this are just, understandably, happy we've won 4 in a row without conceding. I don't think anyone has said with any serious intent that we are going to win the league.Lower West wrote:We've had a run of 4 games against teams in the lower echelons of the league. May not have conceded a goal in these games but we've certainly rode our luck at times. Not the time to get carried away.NewCorkSeth wrote:Well VDB def imposes himself and Swift can dictate a game. Add to that the experience of Quinn, the potential in Evans and the effort of Williams and I reckon were set.Lower West wrote:
How many of the players you named (currently) have the ability to impose themselves and dictate a game?
As yet we don't any sign of a partnership of the Harper/Sidwell ilk.
Certainly not down. To see the club on the up once again is exciting. Having watched the last 4 games. I'm waiting a while longer before I'm going to get carried way. Hence my earlier comment. There's still room for improvement in certain areas of the squad. Yesterday Williams and Evans started, with Kelly on the bench. That was the depth of the midfield options. Very limited.John Madejski's Wallet wrote: For those being down on the team right now, what makes you think we can't happily end up in the playoffs?
Who'd have thought when you have three injuries in one position you might start getting down to limited options.Lower West wrote:Certainly not down. To see the club on the up once again is exciting. Having watched the last 4 games. I'm waiting a while longer before I'm going to get carried way. Hence my earlier comment. There's still room for improvement in certain areas of the squad. Yesterday Williams and Evans started, with Kelly on the bench. That was the depth of the midfield options. Very limited.John Madejski's Wallet wrote: For those being down on the team right now, what makes you think we can't happily end up in the playoffs?
Sorry jmw... You surely can't be thinking of the ex villa striker that never lived up to early promiseJohn Madejski's Wallet wrote: Luke Moore is just f*cking quality
lol well pointed outroyalp-we wrote:Sorry jmw... You surely can't be thinking of the ex villa striker that never lived up to early promiseJohn Madejski's Wallet wrote: Luke Moore is just f*cking quality![]()
Ours has far Moore potential.
Thank you, Thank you
60 points will get you a finish between 12th and 15th usually. 1.3 points per game would get us 68 points which has only got a team a top 6 finish once (Leicester a few years back). A safer shout would be a 1.5 PPG rate (74-75 points) to get top 6.Stranded wrote:Even if we collapse to picking up 1 point a game for the rest of the season, we will get 60 and be in the top 10. If we only pick up around 1.3 points per game on average, we are looking at the playoffs.
One position. We normally play with a midfield three.Ian Royal wrote: Who'd have thought when you have three injuries in one position you might start getting down to limited options.![]()
Jack Celliers wrote:I'm not sure we ever will. I'm not even sure any Championship team ever will. Williams and Swift works quite well for now, though.Lower West wrote:How many of the players you named (currently) have the ability to impose themselves and dictate a game?Royal Ginger wrote:Eh? Midfield!? Really? Swift, Van Den Berg, Evans, Williams, Quinn and Kelly? I'm really not sure what more we could ask for.
As yet we don't any sign of a partnership of the Harper/Sidwell ilk.
Today was good. We kill games off quite well at the moment with our control of possession when everybody might otherwise be getting nervous. It took a while to work out the formation - I presume had Stam worked out where all the goals would come from beforehand.
Al Habsi 7 + 1 for the ED Stand fanclub
Obita 8 really good as a wing back
Moore 7 solid
McShane 7 OK
Blackett 8 crunching tackles at key times
Gunter 6 a bit lost at times - not as well suited to the wing back role as Obita
Evans 7 improving all the time
Williams 8 crucial to everything good
McCleary 8 he's back to his best
Beerens 8 best game for a while
Samuels 10 easily the best thing that has happened to this football club in a decade
A decade that started by finishing 1 point off qualifying for Europe, beating West Ham 6-0, Gylfi, Shane Long, a 2nd promotion, an FA Cup Semi final, several QFs, a play-off final, beating Liverpool at Anfield, Ullyses De La Cruz's goal ...RoyalBlue wrote:Jack Celliers wrote:I'm not sure we ever will. I'm not even sure any Championship team ever will. Williams and Swift works quite well for now, though.Lower West wrote:
How many of the players you named (currently) have the ability to impose themselves and dictate a game?
As yet we don't any sign of a partnership of the Harper/Sidwell ilk.
Today was good. We kill games off quite well at the moment with our control of possession when everybody might otherwise be getting nervous. It took a while to work out the formation - I presume had Stam worked out where all the goals would come from beforehand.
Al Habsi 7 + 1 for the ED Stand fanclub
Obita 8 really good as a wing back
Moore 7 solid
McShane 7 OK
Blackett 8 crunching tackles at key times
Gunter 6 a bit lost at times - not as well suited to the wing back role as Obita
Evans 7 improving all the time
Williams 8 crucial to everything good
McCleary 8 he's back to his best
Beerens 8 best game for a while
Samuels 10 easily the best thing that has happened to this football club in a decade![]()
![]()
Really?! Take 10 years away from 2016 and you end up with? Can't have seen much of Reading, particularly in the earlier years of that decade if you really do think that is true!
Is the problem twofold - firstly fans being slow to come back after a couple of barren years or still being wary - expecting a fall from grace like last seasons implosion.Schards#2 wrote:3rd place is way beyond my wildest expectations for this stage so well done to all concerned for that, however........just putting this out there, is anyone else really bored or is it just me?
I don't think it is, as the stadium is as silent as I can remember it in a decade or more despite our being on a good run. I guess the style of play is just passionless and that seems to transmit to the crowd. For want of a better description, I don't see or feel any "buzz" there at all. It worries my that new younger fans won't get gripped by the theatre and drama of it all as, well, there just isn't much
Does it matter if we keep winning?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], West F and 482 guests