If weget back Cat 1status,the Academy isn't very easily raided and the players are more likely to stay seeing a pathway into playing professsional first team football.Fezza wrote:Lirterally nothing to look forward to in L1, it's a graveyard for big clubs and we'd be back in the EFL's sh!tbooks again for wages. Our academy would be looted by bigger clubs and our owner may well pull out > Administration!
If Plymouth, Barnsley, Bolton and Wycombe can manage to compete with Derby, Wednesday and Pompey, no reason we can't.Fezza wrote:We're not at all, thus we won't have the spending power of Wednesday, Derby, Portsmouth etc. Our academy would possibly be the only point of difference. If the chairman leaves though we'd be buggered.blythspartan wrote:I don’t class us as a big club tbh so we might be alright.Fezza wrote:Lirterally nothing to look forward to in L1, it's a graveyard for big clubs and we'd be back in the EFL's sh!tbooks again for wages. Our academy would be looted by bigger clubs and our owner may well pull out > Administration!
My first ever game was the 6-1 FA cup win against Blyth Spartans. I won’t talk about the relegations but since then I’ve seen promotions in 1975/76, 1978/79, 1983/84, 1985/86 and 1994/95 (for me the finest footballing team we’ve ever had). That’s not too shoddy over a period of 22 years.Franchise FC wrote:The games you’re quoting are over a period of c25 yearsblythspartan wrote:I remember the playoff semi final win against Wigan, the draw at Brentford when we got promoted, a 3-0 away at win at Port Vale to win the division 4 title and beating Wolves 1-0 in the League Cup. Plus, many other great experiences.paddy20 wrote:Clearly most of you have never experienced what its like in the lower divisions
However, other than seeing us get to a playoff final playing some of the most awful football I have ever seen (the game at home to Sunderland springs to mind) and the FA Cup semi final not a lot else springs to mind for years now.
I’d wager most of us have enjoyed significantly more highlights in the last 20 years, even if the last 5-10 have been difficult
He owns the training ground and a share of the stadium. People who become mega rich are rarely charitable.Hound wrote:He’s already lost a ton and nothing left to sell. And fantasies of personal gain are long goneWebster750 wrote:Far too much optimism here.
I see Dai selling absolutely any assets with value for personal gain (if they even exists at this point?) before either leaving us in a literal sense or giving much less attention to the project which will have the same end result, anyway.
by East Grinstead Royal » 08 Apr 2023 22:32
08 Apr 2023 22:32I believe those club either are, or have been operating under restrictions, kind of like the ones we'll have to for next year.Snowflake Royal wrote:If Plymouth, Barnsley, Bolton and Wycombe can manage to compete with Derby, Wednesday and Pompey, no reason we can't.Fezza wrote:We're not at all, thus we won't have the spending power of Wednesday, Derby, Portsmouth etc. Our academy would possibly be the only point of difference. If the chairman leaves though we'd be buggered.blythspartan wrote:
I don’t class us as a big club tbh so we might be alright.
Remember, this is the L1 that Rotherham, Wigan, Peterborough and Barnsley keep getting promoted from.
The plus side is that our owner is unlikely do put us into administration, because that would just reduce the debt the club owes him.Fezza wrote:Historically there is a massive drop in revenue for clubs in League one, the Athletic did a good piece on Wednesday a few years ago:
https://theathletic.com/2434618/2021/03 ... nesday-8m/
That is a club which has generally attracted far bigger crowds than Reading. Without the solidarity payment or the TV revenue we'd be reliant on matchday income, I can only see our current financial plight getting worse, that's with an owner who has already caused two clubs to cease to exist.
I really hope I'm wrong, but the future doesn't look great if we're relegated.
Then again Coventry and Luton went down, came back up... problem is we have a Chinese owner.Fezza wrote:Historically there is a massive drop in revenue for clubs in League one, the Athletic did a good piece on Wednesday a few years ago:
https://theathletic.com/2434618/2021/03 ... nesday-8m/
That is a club which has generally attracted far bigger crowds than Reading. Without the solidarity payment or the TV revenue we'd be reliant on matchday income, I can only see our current financial plight getting worse, that's with an owner who has already caused two clubs to cease to exist.
I really hope I'm wrong, but the future doesn't look great if we're relegated.
No the problem in the main has been the utterly ludicrous choices of manager the club has been making since BM left again. If they’d invested some of the money in that area instead of wasting it on utterly cr@p signings like Aluko and Puscas on idiot contracts the club would be far healthier and may even have jammed its way into the PL by now.elrey wrote:Then again Coventry and Luton went down, came back up... problem is we have a Chinese owner.Fezza wrote:Historically there is a massive drop in revenue for clubs in League one, the Athletic did a good piece on Wednesday a few years ago:
https://theathletic.com/2434618/2021/03 ... nesday-8m/
That is a club which has generally attracted far bigger crowds than Reading. Without the solidarity payment or the TV revenue we'd be reliant on matchday income, I can only see our current financial plight getting worse, that's with an owner who has already caused two clubs to cease to exist.
I really hope I'm wrong, but the future doesn't look great if we're relegated.
Burnley, not been in L1 recentlyelrey wrote:Then again Coventry and Luton went down, came back up... problem is we have a Chinese owner.Fezza wrote:Historically there is a massive drop in revenue for clubs in League one, the Athletic did a good piece on Wednesday a few years ago:
https://theathletic.com/2434618/2021/03 ... nesday-8m/
That is a club which has generally attracted far bigger crowds than Reading. Without the solidarity payment or the TV revenue we'd be reliant on matchday income, I can only see our current financial plight getting worse, that's with an owner who has already caused two clubs to cease to exist.
I really hope I'm wrong, but the future doesn't look great if we're relegated.
Suspect that’s been explained to them by now. He’s not bought a player for 3 years and they’ve finally got a structure in place and new training groundJackson Corner wrote:Someone needs to explain to the Dais that it’s not all about chucking money at the club. Look at Luton, Millwall and don’t get me started on Brentford who deserve everything they get. It’s down to good scouting, players who want to achieve at whatever level. And a manager who knows what he’s doing helps.
Well, not really no. Aside from the top two, the rest of the clubs in the play offs have been in the league for a number of years now and steadily built with the exception being Luton. Norwich have parachute payments, Preston a long-standing member etc.Snowflake Royal wrote:In fact, based on this season your only hope of competing for promotion from.the Championship is if you have parachute payments or have been promoted from L1 in recent years. Meanwhile, if you're a longstanding Championship team you're basically consigned to the bottom half and often a relegation fight.elrey wrote:Then again Coventry and Luton went down, came back up... problem is we have a Chinese owner.Fezza wrote:Historically there is a massive drop in revenue for clubs in League one, the Athletic did a good piece on Wednesday a few years ago:
https://theathletic.com/2434618/2021/03 ... nesday-8m/
That is a club which has generally attracted far bigger crowds than Reading. Without the solidarity payment or the TV revenue we'd be reliant on matchday income, I can only see our current financial plight getting worse, that's with an owner who has already caused two clubs to cease to exist.
I really hope I'm wrong, but the future doesn't look great if we're relegated.
It's a fact.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Well, not really no. Aside from the top two, the rest of the clubs in the play offs have been in the league for a number of years now and steadily built with the exception being Luton. Norwich have parachute payments, Preston a long-standing member etc.Snowflake Royal wrote:In fact, based on this season your only hope of competing for promotion from.the Championship is if you have parachute payments or have been promoted from L1 in recent years. Meanwhile, if you're a longstanding Championship team you're basically consigned to the bottom half and often a relegation fight.elrey wrote:
Then again Coventry and Luton went down, came back up... problem is we have a Chinese owner.
They've all gradually built since being at this level, in fact I recall Millwall and Luton struggled to survive and they've built their platform off that, as have Coventry who are now pushing in the higher climbs of the division.
Teams need a season or two to establish themselves as a Championship side usually before moving upwards, not yoyo-ing between leagues. But it's all based on good recruitment and a footballing philosophy, if you've got that, you're going to succeed.
All of those were a number of years ago now and I'm sure the clubs there currently would argue the fact they didn't go back down after promotion was the springboard to their current successes and just being able to establish themselves at this level has allowed them to build gradually.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's a fact.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Well, not really no. Aside from the top two, the rest of the clubs in the play offs have been in the league for a number of years now and steadily built with the exception being Luton. Norwich have parachute payments, Preston a long-standing member etc.Snowflake Royal wrote:
In fact, based on this season your only hope of competing for promotion from.the Championship is if you have parachute payments or have been promoted from L1 in recent years. Meanwhile, if you're a longstanding Championship team you're basically consigned to the bottom half and often a relegation fight.
They've all gradually built since being at this level, in fact I recall Millwall and Luton struggled to survive and they've built their platform off that, as have Coventry who are now pushing in the higher climbs of the division.
Teams need a season or two to establish themselves as a Championship side usually before moving upwards, not yoyo-ing between leagues. But it's all based on good recruitment and a footballing philosophy, if you've got that, you're going to succeed.
1. Burnley parachute payments
2. Sheff Utd promoted from L1 in 15/16 & parachute payments
3. Luton, promoted from L1 in 18/19
4. Middlesbrough - neither
5. Millwall - promoted from L1 in 16/17
6. Blackburn - promoted from L1 in 17/18
7. Norwich - parachute payments
And you don't have to look far back to see examples of back to back promotion.
Just checked and our mean division position for the last 10 years is 14.7, only Huddersfield and Birmingham are worse of the other Championship clubs and Huddersfield have been promoted in that time. Everyone else is better.
Life as a Reading fan has been utterly miserable for a decade.
From what I can work out, the TV revenue for each division (assuming no parachute payments) are:Fezza wrote:Historically there is a massive drop in revenue for clubs in League one, the Athletic did a good piece on Wednesday a few years ago:
https://theathletic.com/2434618/2021/03 ... nesday-8m/
That is a club which has generally attracted far bigger crowds than Reading. Without the solidarity payment or the TV revenue we'd be reliant on matchday income, I can only see our current financial plight getting worse, that's with an owner who has already caused two clubs to cease to exist.
I really hope I'm wrong, but the future doesn't look great if we're relegated.
I don’t know what you're arguing about, I never said anything about them being promoted from L1 within the last season or so. I said recent years, in the context of having looked at the last ten years as recent performance.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:All of those were a number of years ago now and I'm sure the clubs there currently would argue the fact they didn't go back down after promotion was the springboard to their current successes and just being able to establish themselves at this level has allowed them to build gradually.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's a fact.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:
Well, not really no. Aside from the top two, the rest of the clubs in the play offs have been in the league for a number of years now and steadily built with the exception being Luton. Norwich have parachute payments, Preston a long-standing member etc.
They've all gradually built since being at this level, in fact I recall Millwall and Luton struggled to survive and they've built their platform off that, as have Coventry who are now pushing in the higher climbs of the division.
Teams need a season or two to establish themselves as a Championship side usually before moving upwards, not yoyo-ing between leagues. But it's all based on good recruitment and a footballing philosophy, if you've got that, you're going to succeed.
1. Burnley parachute payments
2. Sheff Utd promoted from L1 in 15/16 & parachute payments
3. Luton, promoted from L1 in 18/19
4. Middlesbrough - neither
5. Millwall - promoted from L1 in 16/17
6. Blackburn - promoted from L1 in 17/18
7. Norwich - parachute payments
And you don't have to look far back to see examples of back to back promotion.
Just checked and our mean division position for the last 10 years is 14.7, only Huddersfield and Birmingham are worse of the other Championship clubs and Huddersfield have been promoted in that time. Everyone else is better.
Life as a Reading fan has been utterly miserable for a decade.
Agree it has been miserable, although I think the last 5 years has definitely, definitely been worse than the first 5 years in that time. These last couple of years have been the lowest points overall.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], RG30, WestYorksRoyal and 123 guests