8 points better than last year's team. Would you say the 21/22 team was worse than this year's team?Stranded wrote:They were better but only 5pts better on the pitch.tmesis wrote:I think Derby getting nearly 30,000 every would give them a rather bigger budget than we'll have.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote: But if Derby can go within 1 game of reaching the play offs given their situation last season, then there is no reason why that shouldn't be a realistic aim for us.
Derby also went down with a far better team than we did, thanks to their 21 point deduction.
Hopefully not.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Depends on squad...if Ince is on a release clause are Holmes, Yiadom and McIntyre also?
The point was that Derby only exited administration 3/4 weeks before the season began in the one just gone. With all the costs and debt that comes with that, as well as having to build a squad again as well (they only had 5 first team players signed on at the start of pre-season), as well as the fact they've also been under a transfer embargo until a couple of weeks ago.tmesis wrote:8 points better than last year's team. Would you say the 21/22 team was worse than this year's team?Stranded wrote:They were better but only 5pts better on the pitch.tmesis wrote: I think Derby getting nearly 30,000 every would give them a rather bigger budget than we'll have.
Derby also went down with a far better team than we did, thanks to their 21 point deduction.
Reagardless, the fact that they probably have a much bigger budget than us, due to getting crowds twice the size, doesn't make them an obvious benchmark.
Isn't that an oxymoron?tidus_mi2 wrote:I'm expecting top 6 so setting myself up for disappointment already.
No, it means I have high expectations, so it leaves more chance of those expectations to not be met and thus, disappointment.BarryWhiteRFC wrote:Isn't that an oxymoron?tidus_mi2 wrote:I'm expecting top 6 so setting myself up for disappointment already.
I like this way of putting it out. My expectations have increased after seeing who's gone up and the mess Wigan are in. I may revise this depending who the manager is. I am basing this off us appointing Wilder and bringing in some solid signings and Dai shows commitment to getting us back up. Think we should be aiming for promotion every year really, but a 3 year timeline is good. As long as we let the new manager build something.Snowflake Royal wrote:Goal: Promotion (within 3 seasons)
Aim: Top 6
----------------------------------------
Expectation: Top 9
Satisfied: Top Half
Disappointing: 16th and above
----------------------------------------
Failure: 17th - 19th
Disaster 20th - 24th
I'd give each new manager minimum 18 months, preferably two seasons, unless they're in failure / disaster territory after 20 games.
Even if they’re way off the goal first season, I think we need to give them time to learn and improve. Continuity and squad building is important. Even if your current man isn't going to get you there, they may at least build you a stable platform to push on and build from. We won't get that swapping every 9 - 12 months.
Defence should be pretty top notch for L1 depending on the keeper situation and whether we manage to hold onto two of Holmes, McIntyre and Mbengue.
Midfield needs a lot of work. This is our big weakness, but it's our weakness because it doesn't exist. Target our resources primarily here for 3 good CMs and a back up, and we should be comfortable, though expect it to take a while to settle.
Attack should be at least solid L1. Though definitely some recruitment required.
Most importantly we shouldn't panic with a slow start. We're going to need an entirely new midfield, with a new manager, on the downer of relegation. I'm mostly looking for a good end to the season rather than farting out limply like usual.
Eight points can be a big difference if they separate the winner of the tournament from the loser...tmesis wrote:8 points better than last year's team. Would you say the 21/22 team was worse than this year's team?Stranded wrote:They were better but only 5pts better on the pitch.tmesis wrote: I think Derby getting nearly 30,000 every would give them a rather bigger budget than we'll have.
Derby also went down with a far better team than we did, thanks to their 21 point deduction.
Reagardless, the fact that they probably have a much bigger budget than us, due to getting crowds twice the size, doesn't make them an obvious benchmark.
Well, they reached the playoffs and we’ve been shit for yearsRoyal_jimmy wrote:How are Peterborough shorter odds than us?
And the bookies have a pretty decent idea who their manager is (i.e. they have one) and what their squad will look like. May look totally different in a few weeks time.Franchise FC wrote:Well, they reached the playoffs and we’ve been shit for yearsRoyal_jimmy wrote:How are Peterborough shorter odds than us?
HTH
Because we are a recently relegated side, they usually end up in and around the top of the list early on with the bookies. Obviously it depends on the situation though. I wouldn't be expecting Wigan to be anywhere near the top of the list, for example.ReadingGlasses wrote:Exactly, how do you come up with odds for a team which
A) has no manager
B) is running low on players and so needs to go on on a big recruitment drive
C) is coming out of a long period of transfer restrictions, and so has no relevant recent pattern of transfer behaviour
Give it a few weeks and things might become clearer, but even as fans we probably won't get a good feel for how things are going to go until the pre-season friendlies at best. Possibly even not until we're a few games in to the season.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Houlton11, Royals and Racers and 176 guests