Got in at 1-0, and Cheltenham go behind on the brink of HT.WestYorksRoyal wrote:We'll be lucky if it's 1-0 at HT. We could/should be out of the game.
Every game that's not happening it's Savage for Craig (or vice versa if Savage started). That and replacing full backs is Selles' answer to everything whether needed or not.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Tbf that's a sensible substitution in the situation.Sutekh wrote:All ready for Selles' one (and only) tactical ploy - Savage for Craig?
I'm not sure we need more tail chasing in midfield.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Tbf that's a sensible substitution in the situation.Sutekh wrote:All ready for Selles' one tactical ploy - Savage for Craig?
It's also down to squad limitations. Savage and Elliott are the only two options you can look to who may have a positive impact. Would love to see him be bold and do Elliott for CraigSutekh wrote:Every game that's not happening it's Savage for Craig (or vice versa if Savage started). That and replacing full backs is Selles' answer to everything whether needed or not.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Tbf that's a sensible substitution in the situation.Sutekh wrote:All ready for Selles' one (and only) tactical ploy - Savage for Craig?
5 point gap over Cheltenham now thanks to Oxford's late goal.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Got in at 1-0, and Cheltenham go behind on the brink of HT.WestYorksRoyal wrote:We'll be lucky if it's 1-0 at HT. We could/should be out of the game.
You'd hope we can't be as bad in the 2nd half, but deep down we all know we can be.
That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is where Selles is really shit. He's been tactically out thought and he'll have no response.
We're just doing exactly the same thing and hoping it'll miraculously start working.
4222 out 4231 in, has changed our season.Orion1871 wrote:That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is where Selles is really shit. He's been tactically out thought and he'll have no response.
We're just doing exactly the same thing and hoping it'll miraculously start working.
Yes, you or someone else has said that before.Orion1871 wrote:That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is where Selles is really shit. He's been tactically out thought and he'll have no response.
We're just doing exactly the same thing and hoping it'll miraculously start working.
Smith isn't a 1 thoughWestYorksRoyal wrote:4222 out 4231 in, has changed our season.Orion1871 wrote:That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is where Selles is really shit. He's been tactically out thought and he'll have no response.
We're just doing exactly the same thing and hoping it'll miraculously start working.
Precisely, we'd be relegated by now following that advice.WestYorksRoyal wrote:4222 out 4231 in, has changed our season.Orion1871 wrote:That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is where Selles is really shit. He's been tactically out thought and he'll have no response.
We're just doing exactly the same thing and hoping it'll miraculously start working.
It's not though. He's still playing the same style of play, same subs, same tempo just a different formation.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes, you or someone else has said that before.Orion1871 wrote:That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is where Selles is really shit. He's been tactically out thought and he'll have no response.
We're just doing exactly the same thing and hoping it'll miraculously start working.
It was obvious nonsense when Selles was using 4-2-2-2 and its obvious nonsense now.
Selles has already learnt the lesson that advice is pure bullshit. Or should have.
Well it's either bad advice, or advice you've heard out of context you don’t understand.Orion1871 wrote:It's not though. He's still playing the same style of play, same subs, same tempo just a different formation.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes, you or someone else has said that before.Orion1871 wrote:
That's what young managers are taught in their coaching courses. Stick to plan A and don't change.
It was obvious nonsense when Selles was using 4-2-2-2 and its obvious nonsense now.
Selles has already learnt the lesson that advice is pure bullshit. Or should have.
I've heard it from people who have actually taken their coaching badges so I'll take their word rather than Cambridges number one radio listener.
lolwutWestYorksRoyal wrote:Results in our favour around us.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Irvinchangeyaname, Royals and Racers, stealthpapes, zaskar and 29 guests