Maybe because Steve Coppell has said he may be more suited to a holding role, as already said!SpaceCruiser wrote:I dunno why you're grinning, you said he would be more comfortable in a holding role in the midfield and yet the Stoke report says he wasn't comfortable there.Reading Abbey wrote:
This is a serious feasability is it??Dangerous wrote: and with Bikey coming in on loan too.
The evening post seems to think it's going through, yes.Flyingkiwi wrote:This is a serious feasability is it??Dangerous wrote: and with Bikey coming in on loan too.
I read Coppell's comment about it be a remote possibility but is it being seriously discussed??
Correct me if I'm wrong but this is the joker that was sent off in a freindly for violent conduct isn't it? If we sign him, even on loan, won't he have to sit out a three match suspension??
red cards are becoming a lot more common in friendlys, not a justification i know, but they are. If you base everything on that one match then he's pretty s**t, but overall on the tour he looked strong and comfortable on the ball. We all know how much Coppell hates undisciplined players, and how disciplined our defense is. So maybe a bit could rub off on him?Flyingkiwi wrote:This is a serious feasability is it??Dangerous wrote: and with Bikey coming in on loan too.
I read Coppell's comment about it be a remote possibility but is it being seriously discussed??
Correct me if I'm wrong but this is the joker that was sent off in a freindly for violent conduct isn't it? If we sign him, even on loan, won't he have to sit out a three match suspension??
Gordon Cumming's right ho wrote:
BTW, don't you think that Kits is one of the most considered commentators on the game? Great soundbites, delivered well ...
Neil Warnockwehateoxford wrote:Gordon Cumming's right ho wrote:
BTW, don't you think that Kits is one of the most considered commentators on the game? Great soundbites, delivered well ...
Agreed, Kits seems pretty sharp for a footballer, and gives great stick i cant wait too see who he pisses off next
Every Villa fan? Are you sure?Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:Every Villa fan say he's the worst player they've had in recent times and when you consider who they've had that is really saying something.
Maybe, but at the end of the day if he was good enough as a squad player for a lower level Pemiership side then why did Villa let him go??Wycombe Royal wrote:Every Villa fan? Are you sure?Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:Every Villa fan say he's the worst player they've had in recent times and when you consider who they've had that is really saying something.
From what I have read they say he is inconsistent but can have some brilliant games. They also say he is better going forward than he is defensively and is a model professional who just gets on with it.
They wish him the best and think he could enjoy better times at another club.
Not sure how it's a step back personally. We've just lost Chris Makin to Southampton. De La Cruz is a similar sort of player to him but has played Prem football (and was actually quite good under Taylor at Villa) and is a regular at international level and played at the World Cup.Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:If he was training for Sheff Utd everyone would be have a massive laugh, going on about what an idiot Warnock and how we're so lucky that Coppell doesn't go round trying to bring in any useless Premiership rejects just because they are availiable. People have spent the whole summer on this board saying how players like this are the exact opposite of what we need, so what's changed??
Every Villa fan say he's the worst player they've had in recent times and when you consider who they've had that is really saying something.
The success of the squad last season was that it was full of players who could push the players in the 1st eleven, someone like De La Cruz would be a massive step back form a succesful formula.
Users browsing this forum: Yellowcoat2 and 501 guests