Yes, on the former, and its incredibly hard, even at the low level of Oxford collegiate reserve team football.Anyone on here tried reffing a match? Or want to become a Ref for that matter?
Yes, on the former, and its incredibly hard, even at the low level of Oxford collegiate reserve team football.Anyone on here tried reffing a match? Or want to become a Ref for that matter?
check it again, he was fully 5 feet from sonks who slipped, no part of sonko came within a yard of him, and he pretended to leave his leg out in the daftest dive attempt ive ever ever seenDirk Gently wrote:I've got no complaints with Poll, so yes, it is you.
because he didn't dive - he was brought down, but only 'cos Sonks fell and clipped him -0 no intent, no penalty, no dive.And why the hell didn't he book the Blackburn player for diving after Sonko fell over behind him in the penalty area ?!
your wrong tooAndyRFC wrote:He didnt have a bad game tbh. And it wasnt a dive.
think we already have with the hunt incedent, the seol incedent, the sidwell incedent, and the mcarthy diveAthleticoSpizz wrote:care to back that up with fact?Muskrat wrote:No, Poll had a shocker today. He thinks he is the star and not the players and deliberatley courts controversy with some his decisions, which are purely attention seeking vehicles.
We lost to a better team on the day, but Mr Poll was hopeless. Some of his decisions were simply baffling, not to mention just plain wrong.
you are wrong too, check out the replays, worse dive of the season, by a mile and 3/4Alan Partridge wrote:Read 2 pages and seen little mention of Sonko's challenge. The most blatent penalty you will see all season not given in Blackburn's favour, or is it not allowed to see it slightly unbiased?
Poll got 2 things wrong for me, other than that was OK.
Blackburn had a sotnewall penalty when Sonko got rinsed and then dragged the guy down
And when Hunt I think was going through, there was a foul and should have been a free kick but was given their way!
West Stand Man wrote:Muskrat, have you seen a replay of the Sonko incident with McCarthy. It was neither a dive nor was it a penalty. It was a good honest accident that involved one player falling forwards.
As to the other 'incidents' that you refer to, Poll was well up with play and a hell of a lot closer to them that you or me. I have a strong suspicion that he knows and understands the laws better than either of us. So, when it comes to deciding who was most probably right in his judgement who do you think I'll go with?
It is so easy to criticise the referee when you are not in extra-sensorial contact with him and have no idea what he has considered in making his call.
Oh and while I am at it, he disallowed the goal on the advice of his assistant. We advise people by giving them advice. See the subtle difference!
absolutely no contact whatsoever, he was 5 ft awayWest Stand Man wrote:Anyone with more than half a brain who has seen the incident on TV will see that there was contact between Sonko's foot and McCarthy's that resulted in McCarthy's ankles clashing. McCarthy may well have accentuated the fall, but to call it a dive is laughable. It was accidental contact and that is that, no pen, no dive.
Mind you, I've heard that being a brain surgeon is pretty hard too and people don't tend to tolerate them making too many mistakes!papereyes wrote:Yes, on the former, and its incredibly hard, even at the low level of Oxford collegiate reserve team football.Anyone on here tried reffing a match? Or want to become a Ref for that matter?
Ifyou seriously have seen the replays and still believe it was a true dive you are as thcik as your spelling indicates.brendywendy wrote:you are wrong too, check out the replays, worse dive of the season, by a mile and 3/4Alan Partridge wrote:Read 2 pages and seen little mention of Sonko's challenge. The most blatent penalty you will see all season not given in Blackburn's favour, or is it not allowed to see it slightly unbiased?
Poll got 2 things wrong for me, other than that was OK.
Blackburn had a sotnewall penalty when Sonko got rinsed and then dragged the guy down
And when Hunt I think was going through, there was a foul and should have been a free kick but was given their way!
i thought it was a pen from the north stand at the time though
I must be "thcik" too then.West Stand Man wrote:Ifyou seriously have seen the replays and still believe it was a true dive you are as thcik as your spelling indicates.brendywendy wrote:you are wrong too, check out the replays, worse dive of the season, by a mile and 3/4Alan Partridge wrote:Read 2 pages and seen little mention of Sonko's challenge. The most blatent penalty you will see all season not given in Blackburn's favour, or is it not allowed to see it slightly unbiased?
Poll got 2 things wrong for me, other than that was OK.
Blackburn had a sotnewall penalty when Sonko got rinsed and then dragged the guy down
And when Hunt I think was going through, there was a foul and should have been a free kick but was given their way!
i thought it was a pen from the north stand at the time though
My daughter works at D&A. She'll fix you an appointment for an eye check if you want.brendywendy wrote:absolutely no contact whatsoever, he was 5 ft awayWest Stand Man wrote:Anyone with more than half a brain who has seen the incident on TV will see that there was contact between Sonko's foot and McCarthy's that resulted in McCarthy's ankles clashing. McCarthy may well have accentuated the fall, but to call it a dive is laughable. It was accidental contact and that is that, no pen, no dive.
Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!bcubed wrote:seems like you are on your own here WS Man
And youve seen the reverse angle?West Stand Man wrote:Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!bcubed wrote:seems like you are on your own here WS Man
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
YupRhys The Royal wrote:And youve seen the reverse angle?West Stand Man wrote:Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!bcubed wrote:seems like you are on your own here WS Man
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 207 guests