I don't understand this. What does it mean?No Fixed Abode wrote:Chelsea lose the vote to the CPO.
That Chelsea can't screw over the fans that helped them out, then sell Stamford Birdge for a huge profit and move somewhere elseleww_rfc wrote:I don't understand this. What does it mean?No Fixed Abode wrote:Chelsea lose the vote to the CPO.
I think the name 'Chelsea' runs with the ground and so your scenario above would only work if RA was prepared to risk losing the right to call the club 'Chelsea'.Ideal wrote:One thing I can't understand is why it is necessary to sell off the ground first, before getting a new plot of land to build on?John Madejski's Wallet wrote:That Chelsea can't screw over the fans that helped them out, then sell Stamford Birdge for a huge profit and move somewhere elseleww_rfc wrote:
I don't understand this. What does it mean?
After all Abramovich is supposedly rolling in cash, why can't he buy new land first, start construction, and then sell the old ground later?
I think that seems illogical to the chelsea fans, and that's why they voted "no".
Some official from the CPO was on the radio yesterday and said they are not against it at all and that a move will take the club forward, just that the 23 day discussion period was too quick and they want more involvment in the talks. SSN then showed some CPO matey outside the stadium last night chanting 'we won't go'who are ya? wrote:Chelsea fans I know just don't want to move from The Bridge and I'm glad this has happened.
What for?Simon's Church wrote:Szczesny should have been sent off though.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 26 guests