Real excellent idea, sit at home and have the backs of people heads and all the assorted idiots in front of you that are probably amongst the reasons you've chosen not to go to the game in the first place.Winston Biscuit wrote:The future of watching sport when you are in a different country
https://x.com/willbrazier/status/182457 ... 36870?s=19
I would quite like to give that a go!
I thought the rule was that you had to be behind the ball when it's played to be onside, which he's not.Brogue wrote:can someone help me out with this one here is the vid
https://x.com/eflobserverpod/status/1825128930551922988
now maybe the rules have changed. however people in the comments are saying this has never been a rule, but I always though the ball has to be played forward to be offside. What the law today? and has it never been a thing that the ball has to be played forward for it to be offside
Doesn't matter which direction it's played as long as the other conditions are met (2 oppo players etc)Brogue wrote:can someone help me out with this one here is the vid
https://x.com/eflobserverpod/status/1825128930551922988
now maybe the rules have changed. however people in the comments are saying this has never been a rule, but I always though the ball has to be played forward to be offside. What the law today? and has it never been a thing that the ball has to be played forward for it to be offside
I thought that, at one point, if a pass played the ball backwards then it didn't matter if someone receiving it was offside.BRO_BOT wrote:Doesn't matter which direction it's played as long as the other conditions are met (2 oppo players etc)Brogue wrote:can someone help me out with this one here is the vid
https://x.com/eflobserverpod/status/1825128930551922988
now maybe the rules have changed. however people in the comments are saying this has never been a rule, but I always though the ball has to be played forward to be offside. What the law today? and has it never been a thing that the ball has to be played forward for it to be offside
To me, it looks like it's the return ball where the player is offside
The Lino was comprehensively wrong.3. No offence
There is no offside offence if a player receives the ball directly from:
a goal kick
a throw-in
a corner kick
The player who rec'd the ball, played it backwards to a now offside corner taker hence the Lino being comprehensively right!Dirk Gently wrote:Law 11 Offside - section 3
The Lino was comprehensively wrong.3. No offence
There is no offside offence if a player receives the ball directly from:
a goal kick
a throw-in
a corner kick
So did BrightonRoyal Rother wrote:Ipswich had the temerity to take the lead.....
The moral of these stories? Utd are no City.Sutekh wrote:So did BrightonRoyal Rother wrote:Ipswich had the temerity to take the lead.....
No moral, justRoyal Rother wrote:The moral of these stories? Utd are no City.Sutekh wrote:So did BrightonRoyal Rother wrote:Ipswich had the temerity to take the lead.....
A state-owned club used for sports washing with 115 charges hanging over itRoyal Rother wrote:The moral of these stories? Utd are no City.Sutekh wrote:So did BrightonRoyal Rother wrote:Ipswich had the temerity to take the lead.....
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 27 guests