I agree, but to be fair they did do a lot of medical research in the early 1940's...2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Please everyone be respectful in times like this and let's not mention the war.
I agree, but to be fair they did do a lot of medical research in the early 1940's...2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Please everyone be respectful in times like this and let's not mention the war.
Apologies from me too... I did have a little giggle at that one...Hendo wrote:Shameful chuckle.Barney wrote:Is that because they put towels on them ?Linden Jones' Tash wrote:Germany has 3 X more ICU beds per head of population than the UK also
I used to write like that because it's easier to read...however on mobile it formats really weirdly don't know if that's still the case!Snowball wrote:What, in English?Simmops wrote:Snowball wrote:Germany has had a far more liberal testing regime than the UK
In the UK you could get tests if
You were returning from a Level 1 danger area
You were returning from a Level 2 danger area and had system
You had had contact with a known Coronavirus carrier
Anyone who has been through the 111 triage system will know
that you have to get through two screening levels just to be
allowed to talk to a clinician who rings you.
Then, IF the clinician deems you a near-enough possible s/he
arranges for the nearest testing hospital to ring YOU and set
a fixed appointment. Your age/vulnerability is considered
So, basically they are (or were) blocking people with sniffles
many of which may well have been suffering mild symptoms
of Covid-19.
The easier you make it for people to take the tests the more likely
you will get hits from younger people and people with mild Covid
They age-bracket for German cases is a lot lower than the UK, hence
a lower death rate.
I have a contact in Leipzig who says their media is saying the same as
other countries: namely that the death rate in the wider population is
likely to approach .5 to 1%
why are you writing like that? it is very odd.
BR0B0T wrote:I used to write like that because it's easier to read...however on mobile it formats really weirdly don't know if that's still the case!Snowball wrote:What, in English?Simmops wrote:
why are you writing like that? it is very odd.
looks more like(dots replaced by space):
I have a contact in Leipzig who says their media is saying the same as..........................................................................other countries: namely that the death rate in the wider population is.................................................................likely to approach .5 to 1%.........................................................I have a contact in Leipzig who says their media is saying the same as................................................................other countries: namely that the death rate in the wider population is...........................................................likely to approach .5 to 1%
I also don't like reading like that for the same reasonSnowball wrote:BR0B0T wrote:I used to write like that because it's easier to read...however on mobile it formats really weirdly don't know if that's still the case!Snowball wrote:
What, in English?
looks more like(dots replaced by space):
I have a contact in Leipzig who says their media is saying the same as..........................................................................other countries: namely that the death rate in the wider population is.................................................................likely to approach .5 to 1%.........................................................I have a contact in Leipzig who says their media is saying the same as................................................................other countries: namely that the death rate in the wider population is...........................................................likely to approach .5 to 1%
Ah, I rarely look at HobNob on my phone
Also, I find it hard to read a very wide piece of writing like this, for example, where the words go all the way across the screen, and seem to fill every space. Maybe it's how my mind works or how I deal with things spatially, but this, for example, I struggle to read, you see?
ThisBR0B0T wrote:just noticed you do the same thing in the post above
Last FIVE daysSnowball wrote:Jagermesiter1871 wrote:So really from today on wards we should see some impact of the lock down in Italy?
Even a relatively unstrict lockdown should have a decent impact on numbers, assuming a majority had some level of isolation i.e just going to supermarket and working from home.
It's only a few days, but, while deaths are rising (infections 18 days ago) there has been a small slowing of new infections. But too early to say, I'd've thought
Last four days
793
650 Drop 1
602 Drop 2 looking promising
743, ah...
If, say we have 599 or better tomorrow, maybe we can start to think the lockdown is working
Looking that way but not yet certain IMO, not with two days higher than Sunday-MondayJagermesiter1871 wrote:Certainly flattened. I think that is good news other than it still being a horrific number.
At last a live event. sky sports are broadcasting the world origami championships this month- it`s on paper view !!!!Hendo wrote:Absolutely, nothing wrong with a bit of light humour to brighten up these dark days.Barney wrote:Cheers Hendo. I was just trying to bring a tiny bit of humour to, I know, what is a horrible and serious situation.Hendo wrote:
Shameful chuckle.
Why do you keep comparing it to winter flu?krapmle wrote:quite frankly its all a load of bollocks
deaths this winter from flu = 112,934
say what you want snowball, you have a long way to go.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Royality creeps In, Semrush [Bot] and 168 guests