Duffy wrote:I didn't think it was a penalty for City. The Ream one, I've seen them given and was quite surprised it wasn't given considering how far his arm was out.
First Premier League team since Opta started statting not to have a shot on goal.Victor Meldrew wrote:Eddie Howe (amazingly favourite with the bookies to be the next England manager) comes up with a masterplan at home to City on Saturday.
Play 10 defenders and a keeper, don't attack,meaning don't have any corners, no shots and no goals.
City had 23 attempts.
If this had been Basingstoke at home to City in a cup game I could understand the tactic as with a 0-0 it would mean a lucrative replay but this was a mid-table side at home to a team in the same division.
For the sake of football, even if it didn't help Liverpool's cause, I was glad that City won the game.
You've got your feet and inches muddled up.Sanguine wrote:Duffy wrote:I didn't think it was a penalty for City. The Ream one, I've seen them given and was quite surprised it wasn't given considering how far his arm was out.![]()
Ream's arm was about 2 inches from his body and didn't move. The ball was smashed at his arm from two feet away. Never a penalty.
Kes.
Why do you call a dear with no eyes? No idea.Sanguine wrote:Surprised you don't muddle your usernames up.
A blind deer. HTH.Duffy wrote:Why do you call a dear with no eyes? No idea.Sanguine wrote:Surprised you don't muddle your usernames up.

6003 posts from Snowflake Royal and as far as I can see, not a funny one. Lots of replies to mocking people mocking you though.Snowflake Royal wrote:Traditionally struggled with those too tbf.
According to Le Tiss they missed half a dozen really straightforward chances as wellstealthpapes wrote:You wouldn't like me when I'm angry
18 minutes in. Manchester City 5-0 Watford.
Man City lost 2-0 to Wolves m8.Sutekh wrote:Well what happened there then?
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 6 guests