Given a **** easy home tie in the 4th round too. Been a good day for Utd all round.BRO_BOT wrote:
Mind-bogglingly stupid is what it is,Ascotexgunner wrote: Arteta not buying a striker in 3 seasons thinking Havertz is the answer is ludicrous.
....they've done it before, as per ...Brogue wrote:Which twat thought white numbers on the back of Arsenal white shirt was a good idea
Isn’t the idea that Havertz plays the “Firmino” role? Not necessarily there for his goalscoring but for a specific role? Granted, he doesn’t do the role as well as Firmino did and some of his finishing has been poor but let’s not forget how underwhelming the likes of Martinelli, Trossard, Jesus and Sterling have beenRoyal Rother wrote:Mind-bogglingly stupid is what it is,Ascotexgunner wrote: Arteta not buying a striker in 3 seasons thinking Havertz is the answer is ludicrous.
Another season's potential trophies chucked away by the insane lack of anyone half-resembling a striker.
Chris Wood would have scored a hat-trick for them today.
Youd presume the mentality of clubs would shift if replays still existed, I.e. Werner would have been subbed off a long time before if it was still the casegenome wrote:Shame about the no replay rule change. Tamworth deserved a big replay by getting to 90 minutes at 0-0
All that can be true as well of course.URZZZZ wrote:Isn’t the idea that Havertz plays the “Firmino” role? Not necessarily there for his goalscoring but for a specific role? Granted, he doesn’t do the role as well as Firmino did and some of his finishing has been poor but let’s not forget how underwhelming the likes of Martinelli, Trossard, Jesus and Sterling have beenRoyal Rother wrote:Mind-bogglingly stupid is what it is,Ascotexgunner wrote: Arteta not buying a striker in 3 seasons thinking Havertz is the answer is ludicrous.
Another season's potential trophies chucked away by the insane lack of anyone half-resembling a striker.
Chris Wood would have scored a hat-trick for them today.
Memory may be off but didn’t City also win the league with a “false 9” the season before Haaland joined?
And we also saw Stam trial a 4-6-0 vs Stevanage in the cup!URZZZZ wrote:Isn’t the idea that Havertz plays the “Firmino” role? Not necessarily there for his goalscoring but for a specific role? Granted, he doesn’t do the role as well as Firmino did and some of his finishing has been poor but let’s not forget how underwhelming the likes of Martinelli, Trossard, Jesus and Sterling have beenRoyal Rother wrote:Mind-bogglingly stupid is what it is,Ascotexgunner wrote: Arteta not buying a striker in 3 seasons thinking Havertz is the answer is ludicrous.
Another season's potential trophies chucked away by the insane lack of anyone half-resembling a striker.
Chris Wood would have scored a hat-trick for them today.
Memory may be off but didn’t City also win the league with a “false 9” the season before Haaland joined?
Agreed. Tamworth were completely mentally tired, as shown by Tottenham's first goal. Tottenham were obviously fitter too. Their best hope was getting to penalties, or some sort of serious Tottenham error.URZZZZ wrote:Youd presume the mentality of clubs would shift if replays still existed, I.e. Werner would have been subbed off a long time before if it was still the casegenome wrote:Shame about the no replay rule change. Tamworth deserved a big replay by getting to 90 minutes at 0-0
They were always going to win in ET, talent notwithstanding as they had the legs advantage over Tamworth
But how would Tottenham (or any other top side) have the energy and resources to fit in another game? The poor little mites are on a shoestring budget, just trying to make ends meet. They deserve a break.genome wrote:Shame about the no replay rule change. Tamworth deserved a big replay by getting to 90 minutes at 0-0
They need to save their energy for the money spinning tour to Australia at the end of the seasonkatweslowski wrote:But how would Tottenham (or any other top side) have the energy and resources to fit in another game? The poor little mites are on a shoestring budget, just trying to make ends meet. They deserve a break.genome wrote:Shame about the no replay rule change. Tamworth deserved a big replay by getting to 90 minutes at 0-0
And the ground was full. Tamworth, unless taken over by Ryan Reynolds, will likely play Spurs once in the lifetime of every fan who has watched them this season. I hope they gave priority to regular fans, but no-one was truthfully priced out - if you're a Tamworth fan you'd happily pay that as a one-off.Winston Biscuit wrote:Just learned that Tamworth usually charge £18 for adults and kids get in free, but yesterday it was £40 for adults and £25 for kids.
Yes they would have had a replay and mega £££ coming their way if it wasn’t for the big clubs and spineless FASilver Fox wrote:I'm not sure if I like the price going up so much but arguably they wouldn't have done so if a replay was a possibility
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests