As mentioned by a friend. Arteta is the Spanish Southgate. Gets his team to that next level but not capable of getting over the line and come the big game, pulls the hand break up.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Liverpool not playing great and looking pretty unconvincing, but already 5 points clear. Will their performance levels improve? Or will results start to slip?
And even if their results tail off a little, will anyone take advantage? Arsenal and City don't look great. Last season Liverpool were pretty average after the New Year and nobody applied pressure on them.
After a few years of having two exceptional teams in Klopp's Liverpool and Guardiola's City v.1, it seems there is a bit of a lull now. Arguably it makes the league more competitive and exciting, but the title races and matches those two had were awesome.
I also wonder what the future is for Arsenal and Arteta. He's done a good job and has made them consistently compete at the top level, but if he can't complete the job this season, is it time for someone else to have a go? As outlined above, he's not competing with exceptional teams.
or they HAVE actually played:windermereROYAL wrote:5 games gone 33 to play, after next week Arsenal will have played united Liverpool Newcastle away and city at home in their first 6 games, Liverpool have played Arsenal home and Newcastle away.
On todays game, that twat Neville called city`s performance a masterclass in defending while in the past he`s slated Arsenal for exactly the same thing, remember city away with 10 men last year? Keane and Carragher are no better, hypocrisy of the highest level.
I thought that but Rice ,when interviewed afterwards, said they had played really wel (is this part of the modern football philosophy that you must always look at the positives regardless of what has happened?).Ascotexgunner wrote:Seriously, Arteta is costing Arsenal the title.
Absolutely cowardly tactics and starting lineup, go a goal down and zero ideas other than tippy happy round the box.....
Even the Stoke tactic is wearing thin.
Harry Kane being 13th in the voting also seems well off.Sanguine wrote:Feels like the Ballon D'Or has just become about rewarding an excellent player on the Champions League winning team (I've not checked prior winners, likely proves me wrong!).
Dembele I don't get at all. This is a 28 year old with 81 career league goals. Before last season you have to go back to 2015/16 for the last time he hit double figures. And sure, 35 goals in all comps for PSG, a great season. But better than Salah's season? Come on now.
Point of the team award is to award the best team. Which was PSG. If Liverpool had won the CL, Salah probably would have got the Ballon D'Or. It's a little silly.
Takes me to an astonishing stat. In 1998-99, Dwight Yorke was the Champions League top scorer, the Premier League top scorer, he got second most assists in the Champions League, third most assists in the Premier League, and United won an unprecedented English domestic treble. Yorke came 11th in the Ballon D'Or voting.
What Is Evaluated in the Candidates?
Journalists must adhere to three main criteria defined by France Football:
Individual and decisive performance: Goals, assists, statistics, influence on the game, and consistency throughout the season.
Collective successes and team achievements: Titles won at both club and international levels, and the player’s role in those successes.
Fair play and public image: The footballer’s class on and off the pitch, including sportsmanship and charitable actions.
Within this framework, the 2025 Ballon d’Or not only honors the best player of the season but also the one who embodies the values of football both on and off the field.
Think Beckham should have won that year. He was Utd's best player, contributed to all of the big goals etc. Assume Rivaldo won based on international performances (plus club obvs) as Brazil won the Copa AmericaSanguine wrote: Takes me to an astonishing stat. In 1998-99, Dwight Yorke was the Champions League top scorer, the Premier League top scorer, he got second most assists in the Champions League, third most assists in the Premier League, and United won an unprecedented English domestic treble. Yorke came 11th in the Ballon D'Or voting.
These are the occasions when "footballers are thick" rings true.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Wtf was Ekitike thinking? Either he didn't know it was a bookable offense, forgot that he'd already been booked, or wanted to miss the next game. But why take your shirt off for a goal in the mickey mouse cup against a team in the league below?!
Their reliance on set pieces to create chances rather than focusing on using the hugely gifted resources at their disposal to create chances in open play is an embarrassment.South Coast Royal wrote:I thought that but Rice ,when interviewed afterwards, said they had played really wel (is this part of the modern football philosophy that you must always look at the positives regardless of what has happened?).Ascotexgunner wrote:Seriously, Arteta is costing Arsenal the title.
Absolutely cowardly tactics and starting lineup, go a goal down and zero ideas other than tippy happy round the box.....
Even the Stoke tactic is wearing thin.
For once I agreed with Carra when he said that Arsenal's problem is not being without a decent striker it is that they fail to make enough chances.
As fot the long throws and corners this is not Wimbledon it is Arsenal who have spent a small fortune on good footballers but seem to want to rely on goalmouth scrambles for their goals.
Very un-Spanish.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Jammy Dodger and 38 guests