Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.Sanguine wrote:Every PL game in September to be available live, with the suspension of the 3pm blackout extended with fans still locked out of games.
https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... -tv/184085
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.Old Man Andrews wrote:Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.Sanguine wrote:Every PL game in September to be available live, with the suspension of the 3pm blackout extended with fans still locked out of games.
https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... -tv/184085
It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.Simmops wrote:I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.Old Man Andrews wrote:Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.Sanguine wrote:Every PL game in September to be available live, with the suspension of the 3pm blackout extended with fans still locked out of games.
https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... -tv/184085
But you do not have to watch them all and it is still cheaper then going to a game IRLPepe the Horseman wrote:It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.Simmops wrote:I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.Old Man Andrews wrote: Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.
But it's not even close to being the same experience as going to a game. You have to watch it on your phone, or a laptop, and if you don't want to pick and choose your games, it's more expensive than a Sky Sports sub.Simmops wrote:But you do not have to watch them all and it is still cheaper then going to a game IRLPepe the Horseman wrote:It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.Simmops wrote:
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It'd cost about £450 in tickets to see them live though.Pepe the Horseman wrote:It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.Simmops wrote:I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.Old Man Andrews wrote: Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.
£450 plus the travel, food and booze and time.Snowflake Royal wrote:It'd cost about £450 in tickets to see them live though.Pepe the Horseman wrote:It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.Simmops wrote:
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It's really easy to cast stuff to a tv or hook a pc/ laptop up to one.
The experience argument you have to ask yourself what you're going for... is it to watch a football match or get pissed with the lads. If it's the former about half price seems fair, if it's the latter, why would you buy it no matter the price?
No problem with £10 a game, quite simply if you don’t like it, don’t pay it!Snowflake Royal wrote:It'd cost about £450 in tickets to see them live though.Pepe the Horseman wrote:It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.Simmops wrote:
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It's really easy to cast stuff to a tv or hook a pc/ laptop up to one.
The experience argument you have to ask yourself what you're going for... is it to watch a football match or get pissed with the lads. If it's the former about half price seems fair, if it's the latter, why would you buy it no matter the price?
BR0B0T wrote:lol...switched off already!
listened to bits of it on a youtube watchalongSouthDownsRoyal wrote:BR0B0T wrote:lol...switched off already!
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered themSanguine wrote:A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.URZZZZ wrote:I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered themSanguine wrote:A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
I think Robson Kanu being West Brom’s 1st/2nd choice striker is also a big issue, WBA in dire need of a strikerSouth Coast Royal wrote:Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.URZZZZ wrote:I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered themSanguine wrote:A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
I think they need a lot more than that.URZZZZ wrote:I think Robson Kanu being West Brom’s 1st/2nd choice striker is also a big issue, WBA in dire need of a strikerSouth Coast Royal wrote:Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.URZZZZ wrote:
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
Fulham have signed two defenders and a keeper in the last week, so I'd expect some changes soon enough. Ironically it was a poor performance from keeper Rodak that really summed up Fulham in their defeat, after fans had been up in arms at Areaola's signing, as Rodak was brilliant in the Championship.South Coast Royal wrote:Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.URZZZZ wrote:I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered themSanguine wrote:A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
Fulham certainly need something.Sanguine wrote:Fulham have signed two defenders and a keeper in the last week, so I'd expect some changes soon enough. Ironically it was a poor performance from keeper Rodak that really summed up Fulham in their defeat, after fans had been up in arms at Areaola's signing, as Rodak was brilliant in the Championship.South Coast Royal wrote:Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.URZZZZ wrote:
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests