B*gg*r*ed if I know, just a line in the Chronic pitching him in with all the others we know are out:3points wrote:what's happened to Bouzanis?
Reading-Chronicle wrote: As many as eight first-team players remain out for the visit of top-of-the-table Burnley on Saturday.
The likes of Ovie Ejaria, Baba Rahman, Shane Long, Tom Ince, Tom McIntyre, Dean Bouzanis and Junior Hoilett will all miss the vast majority of the season- if not all of it.
Let's be honest, for this season Bouzanis, Moore, Ejaria and Rahman are no loss,they either haven'treally contributed at all ot have been very poor.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:9 players not expected back this season, it will be a miracle for Hunt to keep us in the league this season.
Hutch badly missed in my viewSnowflake Royal wrote:Let's be honest, for this season Bouzanis, Moore, Ejaria and Rahman are no loss,they either haven'treally contributed at all ot have been very poor.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:9 players not expected back this season, it will be a miracle for Hunt to keep us in the league this season.
Hoilett and Long are realistically fringe players, useful, but not definitely first teamers. Hoilett played a lot, but his avialability pushed us into that godawful back 5. Only one of Holmes and McIntyre should be starting anyway. So it's only really Tom Ince that is the big loss. And his form took a dip anyway.
This 100% we probably could and should have played 4-2-3-1 if Hutch was available. He and Loum would have been that steadying influence in front of the back four giving us way more protection that we had.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Hutch badly missed in my viewSnowflake Royal wrote:Let's be honest, for this season Bouzanis, Moore, Ejaria and Rahman are no loss,they either haven'treally contributed at all ot have been very poor.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:9 players not expected back this season, it will be a miracle for Hunt to keep us in the league this season.
Hoilett and Long are realistically fringe players, useful, but not definitely first teamers. Hoilett played a lot, but his avialability pushed us into that godawful back 5. Only one of Holmes and McIntyre should be starting anyway. So it's only really Tom Ince that is the big loss. And his form took a dip anyway.
Absence makes the heart grow fonder.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Hutch badly missed in my viewSnowflake Royal wrote:Let's be honest, for this season Bouzanis, Moore, Ejaria and Rahman are no loss,they either haven'treally contributed at all ot have been very poor.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:9 players not expected back this season, it will be a miracle for Hunt to keep us in the league this season.
Hoilett and Long are realistically fringe players, useful, but not definitely first teamers. Hoilett played a lot, but his avialability pushed us into that godawful back 5. Only one of Holmes and McIntyre should be starting anyway. So it's only really Tom Ince that is the big loss. And his form took a dip anyway.
but a shoe-in when he is I guessSnowflake Royal wrote:Do we have any choice?
He's barely been fit all season, just 11 games played, and is 33.
You wouldn’t choose him as a signing.
Yes indeed, unless Tetek could take that work on?AthleticoSpizz wrote:but a shoe-in when he is I guessSnowflake Royal wrote:Do we have any choice?
He's barely been fit all season, just 11 games played, and is 33.
You wouldn’t choose him as a signing.
LumleySnowflake Royal wrote:Absence makes the heart grow fonder.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Hutch badly missed in my viewSnowflake Royal wrote: Let's be honest, for this season Bouzanis, Moore, Ejaria and Rahman are no loss,they either haven'treally contributed at all ot have been very poor.
Hoilett and Long are realistically fringe players, useful, but not definitely first teamers. Hoilett played a lot, but his avialability pushed us into that godawful back 5. Only one of Holmes and McIntyre should be starting anyway. So it's only really Tom Ince that is the big loss. And his form took a dip anyway.
Not really at CB, more reliable than Loum at DM, but less good on a good Loum day.
Our best XI if everyone is fit, in form and playing well is probably:
........................Lumley
Yiadom, Mbengue, Holmes, NGW
.........................Loum
..........Casadei...........Fornah
...Meite.................................Ince
..........................Joao
Tetek has been injured more than Hutch this seasonSutekh wrote:Yes indeed, unless Tetek could take that work on?AthleticoSpizz wrote:but a shoe-in when he is I guessSnowflake Royal wrote:Do we have any choice?
He's barely been fit all season, just 11 games played, and is 33.
You wouldn’t choose him as a signing.
I believe Tetek was last match fit in Jan last year (Kiddy cup game?). Useful player but don't think he would have a role under Ince even if fitFranchise FC wrote:Tetek has been injured more than Hutch this seasonSutekh wrote:Yes indeed, unless Tetek could take that work on?AthleticoSpizz wrote:but a shoe-in when he is I guess
Or am I dreaming
Both about the same. Be interesting to see whether the club offer him (Tetek) a deal in the summer, I'm hoping they will as he is still only 20 and does show some very decent promise.Franchise FC wrote:Tetek has been injured more than Hutch this seasonSutekh wrote:Yes indeed, unless Tetek could take that work on?AthleticoSpizz wrote:but a shoe-in when he is I guess
Or am I dreaming
Ejaria and Rahman are losses, they make our matchday squad, as would Moore and Bouzanis, but obviously the former 3 pushing for a starting place. Hoilett is a useful player, as is Long.Snowflake Royal wrote:Let's be honest, for this season Bouzanis, Moore, Ejaria and Rahman are no loss,they either haven'treally contributed at all ot have been very poor.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:9 players not expected back this season, it will be a miracle for Hunt to keep us in the league this season.
Hoilett and Long are realistically fringe players, useful, but not definitely first teamers. Hoilett played a lot, but his avialability pushed us into that godawful back 5. Only one of Holmes and McIntyre should be starting anyway. So it's only really Tom Ince that is the big loss. And his form took a dip anyway.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 383 guests