If found guilty … is the bit you left outWinston Biscuit wrote:if they were banned from Europe for, say, 2 seasons, then that would have a real world impact as players would want out, and others wouldn't join.
I would say a a good punishment would be a 2 year euro ban, a transfer window ban, and start next season on a large points deduction
well, obvFranchise FC wrote:If found guilty … is the bit you left outWinston Biscuit wrote:if they were banned from Europe for, say, 2 seasons, then that would have a real world impact as players would want out, and others wouldn't join.
I would say a a good punishment would be a 2 year euro ban, a transfer window ban, and start next season on a large points deduction
How many others do you think will get dragged in to the same position ?Winston Biscuit wrote:FTR - I actually think this is a big deal and think something pretty severe will happen to them if found guilty. I am not in the 'the PL will do f all about it' camp
would love a Calciopoli type situation in English football
But any redundancies would be the fault of City not the punishing authorities so they can’t pull that one.AthleticoSpizz wrote:…a side issue being in the defence that they may care to use
“Hundreds of redundancies will have to be made” …spare them a thought guv’nor
“The Non-league teams could never safely host us”
“We are a World product”
??? go figure, it’ll end up being an ‘appropriate’ punishment.
I think that's the issue, if City get punished then there will no doubt be more finger-pointing at other clubs who have done x, y and z in the past as well.Franchise FC wrote:How many others do you think will get dragged in to the same position ?Winston Biscuit wrote:FTR - I actually think this is a big deal and think something pretty severe will happen to them if found guilty. I am not in the 'the PL will do f all about it' camp
would love a Calciopoli type situation in English football
My guess is that City will use that as a lever “if you’re going to punish us you have to punish A, B or C”
If found guilty (nearly caught by my own pedantry there)
I thought Arsenal huffed and puffed and were very fortunate to get that penalty after the player had already shot.Royal Rother wrote:Repeating myself but it’s been clear this season that the way to unsettle Arsenal (and City for that matter) is to get right in their faces and never let up.
City did it well last night and showed a bit of their darker side.
Arsenal’s defensive errors and Partey’s absence were clearly key but I’m thinking it was the respective strikers who really made the difference. Haaland was right on it, whereas Nketiah could / should have scored a hat trick but got none. Swap the strikers and it might have been a reverse scoreline.
Tyldesley always shows bias towards whichever side he thinks is in the ascendancy at that moment in time.South Coast Royal wrote:I was neutral about the game but McCoist and Tyldesley were commentating for Arsenal TV, they were so one-sided in the way they looked at things
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests