Well it wouldn't be unreasonableNewCorkSeth wrote:Great. Now we get another week of chat about Holmes.
Well it wouldn't be unreasonableNewCorkSeth wrote:Great. Now we get another week of chat about Holmes.
Unless Holmes would've been playing instead of Semedo then it's irrelevant.bcubed wrote:Well it wouldn't be unreasonableNewCorkSeth wrote:Great. Now we get another week of chat about Holmes.
My point from earlierLower West wrote:We rarely trouble the opposition keepers.
Agreed.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Unless Holmes would've been playing instead of Semedo then it's irrelevant.bcubed wrote:Well it wouldn't be unreasonableNewCorkSeth wrote:Great. Now we get another week of chat about Holmes.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], yappy and 337 guests