Trouble is Meite struggles up top by himself tooYorkshireRoyal99 wrote:I wouldn't start Puscas up front on his own, would have to be in a 2 with Meite otherwise we may as well just start without a striker, he's been here long enough for us to know he just isn't effective as a lone striker. If we go with 1, it has to be Meite, if we go with 2 then yes, Puscas and Meite. All of that is assuming Joao isn't fit to start the game or is ruled out entirely, which doesn't seem to be the case.Ascotexgunner wrote:I'm just saying it's an option.NewCorkSeth wrote: Right but you're suggesting plating Puscas with Ince and Hoillett? Dropping Meite to the bench.. unless I've misunderstood..
João clearly won't play 20 games at this rate, Long is already injured and Meite is not exactly Mr Consistent on the injury free front. He will pick a another one up, its guaranteed.
In a 442 they would, Meite wins enough in the air for Puscas to gamble on the 2nd ball. Puscas can finish. meite has the work ethic to drop in and fill the gaps out of possession.Snowflake Royal wrote:I'd be tempted to start Azeez up top on his own over Puscas or Meite there.
And I don’t think Puscas and Meite work well as a pair.
More brawn than brain. Will be occasions where they can work really well together, like the 5-0 win over Luton but too often a lack of cohesionSnowflake Royal wrote:I'd be tempted to start Azeez up top on his own over Puscas or Meite there.
And I don’t think Puscas and Meite work well as a pair.
Yeah agree Meite struggles on his own, but he's still better than Puscas on his own. I'd start both, I think they could play off each other quite well if we could get them to play as a 2 as they are both different types of strikers. The link up play wouldn't be there with them naturally but if we can get enough quality into them both, through wide areas, into feet to get at defenders, in behind etc it would cause defences problems.URZZZZ wrote:Trouble is Meite struggles up top by himself tooYorkshireRoyal99 wrote:I wouldn't start Puscas up front on his own, would have to be in a 2 with Meite otherwise we may as well just start without a striker, he's been here long enough for us to know he just isn't effective as a lone striker. If we go with 1, it has to be Meite, if we go with 2 then yes, Puscas and Meite. All of that is assuming Joao isn't fit to start the game or is ruled out entirely, which doesn't seem to be the case.Ascotexgunner wrote:
I'm just saying it's an option.
João clearly won't play 20 games at this rate, Long is already injured and Meite is not exactly Mr Consistent on the injury free front. He will pick a another one up, its guaranteed.
If he is the only option we have up top, need to play to his strengths, build up down the flanks rather than through the middle and get crosses in for him. Futile playing through the middle and asking him to hold it up because he can’t do it and it really doesn’t play to his strengths
Meite never suited the ball being played into his feet and holding up, which the likes of Pauno and Gomes wanted from him. But if we were to play a more pragmatic style of balls in behind to run onto and crosses into the box, Meite could absolutely be the focal point.Hound wrote:I’d be amazed if Meite doesn’t start as our CF
He can do the role - as said just need to play to his strengths - balls out wide and crosses or through balls for him
Fwiw if he stays fit have a feeling he might really smash it this year. Looks proper up for it
Yeah that. Neither has a reliable first touch, both a bit brute force.URZZZZ wrote:More brawn than brain. Will be occasions where they can work really well together, like the 5-0 win over Luton but too often a lack of cohesionSnowflake Royal wrote:I'd be tempted to start Azeez up top on his own over Puscas or Meite there.
And I don’t think Puscas and Meite work well as a pair.
Think J.Clarke has a really big future, would like to see him get a chance but given he’s had no pre-season with us, isn’t going to happen
Azeez needs a strong start to the season, started well last year but really tailed off and kept getting injured (guess he fit in well then)
+1WestYorksRoyal wrote:Meite never suited the ball being played into his feet and holding up, which the likes of Pauno and Gomes wanted from him. But if we were to play a more pragmatic style of balls in behind to run onto and crosses into the box, Meite could absolutely be the focal point.Hound wrote:I’d be amazed if Meite doesn’t start as our CF
He can do the role - as said just need to play to his strengths - balls out wide and crosses or through balls for him
Fwiw if he stays fit have a feeling he might really smash it this year. Looks proper up for it
Your mood will probably change by full time, though!NathStPaul wrote:Not sure about anyone else but I just can't get up for it this season, just a bit meh at the moment. This will of course change when we are 0-4 up after 25 minutes.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Nick Shorey my Lord!, Wallington Royal, Za Vas and 295 guests