So why isn't he taking any notice on NGW, pace at the back, shape, intent, Dann, etcMillsy wrote:Ince is clearly studying our constant posts here. Put crosses in and we'll get goals. Simple.
Like most wing backs he can’t defend but rather him offering something than Rahman failing to offer anything or McIntyre being asked to play there.Snowflake Royal wrote:So why isn't he taking any notice on NGW, pace at the back, shape, intent, Dann, etcMillsy wrote:Ince is clearly studying our constant posts here. Put crosses in and we'll get goals. Simple.
He's a selective reader.Snowflake Royal wrote:So why isn't he taking any notice on NGW, pace at the back, shape, intent, Dann, etcMillsy wrote:Ince is clearly studying our constant posts here. Put crosses in and we'll get goals. Simple.
Let's go mental: Azeez for Hendrick.Snowflake Royal wrote:Would like to see Azeez for Carroll in the next 10 minutes.
If you want to go mental, Azeez for DannMillsy wrote:Let's go mental: Azeez for Hendrick.Snowflake Royal wrote:Would like to see Azeez for Carroll in the next 10 minutes.
Let’s go conspiratorial: Azeez for LumleySnowflake Royal wrote:If you want to go mental, Azeez for DannMillsy wrote:Let's go mental: Azeez for Hendrick.Snowflake Royal wrote:Would like to see Azeez for Carroll in the next 10 minutes.
Sutekh wrote:Let’s go conspiratorial: Azeez for LumleySnowflake Royal wrote:If you want to go mental, Azeez for DannMillsy wrote:
Let's go mental: Azeez for Hendrick.
I think the spate of 'supersub Dann' appearances will be hard to beat.Snowflake Royal wrote:Discuss: would Azeez for Lumley be Paul Ince's worst substitute decision?
It absolutely should be, but I'm not 100% certain it would be.
Got a bit stuck under his feet and the shooting opening never quite appeared, but should have just had a dig, more times you turn the more chances to fluff or be tackled.Millsy wrote:Oh dear João.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 113 guests