Wycombe been seriously impressive this seasonPepe the Horseman wrote:3-0 and top of the leagueSutekh wrote:Meanwhile in proper football Wycombe are winning 2-0 at Stockport inside 15 minutes.
Wycombe been seriously impressive this seasonPepe the Horseman wrote:3-0 and top of the leagueSutekh wrote:Meanwhile in proper football Wycombe are winning 2-0 at Stockport inside 15 minutes.
….and still heavily featuring Gareth Mc (not tonight tho’)Hound wrote:Wycombe been seriously impressive this seasonPepe the Horseman wrote:3-0 and top of the leagueSutekh wrote:Meanwhile in proper football Wycombe are winning 2-0 at Stockport inside 15 minutes.
Or win the penalty shoot out if the match is drawn.Sutekh wrote:Just need to beat Newport next week to qualify
Chelt - 3 - 9
Ding - 2 - 3
Newp - 2 -3
Ham - 3- 0
And in doing so, beat them.Royals and Racers wrote:Or win the penalty shoot out if the match is drawn.Sutekh wrote:Just need to beat Newport next week to qualify
Chelt - 3 - 9
Ding - 2 - 3
Newp - 2 -3
Ham - 3- 0
Can't say I blame Ruben who had little choice really given the amount of football we've played and how threadbare the squad is.Fox Talbot wrote:Usual cup suicide from Reading. Thought we might be getting somewhere start of second half then we make a load of unforced changes, back to a trial match, concede, lose.
When you’ve got ten players only playing part of the game do they feel the same responsibility for the result? Feels too easy to say not my problem. Much rather we got results than just ‘gave minutes’ - jmore good cup results you get more chance of getting minutes further down the line. Better for morale if you win. Feel sorry for our poor fans who went.
Was one of those games I’d really have enjoyed a few years back. However seems to be the norm nowadays for us to chuck in a load of kids in a cup game and see them lose valiantlyJerry St Clair wrote:I enjoyed that. An absorbing, if not thrilling, game.
Cheltenham had two Academy graduates at fullback in Liggett and Willcox. Otherwise it was a bunch of fairly seasoned lower league pros. And Reading's kids stood up well. Matty Taylor and Ryan Bowman didn't get much of a sniff in front of goal aided, partly, by some wasteful delivery. But the Reading defending was pretty solid for the most part.
It took Michael Flynn making a triple substitution to bring on, arguably, Cheltenham's three best and most exciting attacking players this season - Jordan Thomas, Arkell Jude-Boyd and Joel Colwill - to break the deadlock.
One of those games where everybody can be fairly happy, I suspect.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 220 guests