Yeah. It's not like we have so many trophies it makes sense to turn any down. We are exceptionally unlikely to go up, we sure as shit aren't getting to an FA Cup Semi in this state.stealthpapes wrote:err, I am?Are we that desperate for minor glory?
EFL Trophy would be a banger. No downside to losing, loads of upside. In 2001, we swamped Cardiff in blue and white vs Walsall. So yeah, I expect fans to come out of the woodwork.
FA cup better, agree, but also (a) more random in terms of quality we could face and (b) likely harder.
Hi SCR, the last 9 finals (2 finals were behind closed doors, Covid) have actually had some pretty decent attendance figures:South Coast Royal wrote:Do you really think that would happen if we played somebody like Morecambe or Crewe?From Despair To Where? wrote:To be fair, if, and I accept that's a big if, but if we got to the final we could take 30,000+ to Wembley and that would be a decent pay day.
Are we that desperate for minor glory?
This isn't like the Simod Cup where we had beaten top level clubs such as Chelsea and Coventry and were due to play League Cup finalists Luton.
IMHO the club would make more money from further progress in the FA Cup and that should be the immediate priority.
Fair enough .Crowbar6753 wrote:Hi SCR, the last 9 finals (2 finals were behind closed doors, Covid) have actually had some pretty decent attendance figures:South Coast Royal wrote:Do you really think that would happen if we played somebody like Morecambe or Crewe?From Despair To Where? wrote:To be fair, if, and I accept that's a big if, but if we got to the final we could take 30,000+ to Wembley and that would be a decent pay day.
Are we that desperate for minor glory?
This isn't like the Simod Cup where we had beaten top level clubs such as Chelsea and Coventry and were due to play League Cup finalists Luton.
IMHO the club would make more money from further progress in the FA Cup and that should be the immediate priority.
42,000 Peterbro v Wycombe
30,600 Rotherham v Sutton
85,000 (Record) Portsmouth v Sunderland
42,000 Lincoln v Shrewsbury
74,400 Coventry v Oxford
59,500 Barnsley v Oxford
72,300 Walsall v Bristol.C
That's an average of around 58,000.
The last two have been played between fairly smaller supported clubs hence the lower crowd. I would like to think that the draw of a Wembley visit against a half decent team and we would take 25,000+ to Wembley. Even if you take the average attendance of 58,000 that equates to nearly 1.8 million in gate receipts (based on a 30 pound ticket, so may be higher!). Not sure how much of that figure is shared between the clubs but nothing to be sniffed at.
Clubs get 45% of the Wembley money from the League Trophy final (after costs) - which would be worth about £1m per club with a crowd of 58,000 with an average of £40 tickets.South Coast Royal wrote:Fair enough .Crowbar6753 wrote:Hi SCR, the last 9 finals (2 finals were behind closed doors, Covid) have actually had some pretty decent attendance figures:South Coast Royal wrote:
Do you really think that would happen if we played somebody like Morecambe or Crewe?
Are we that desperate for minor glory?
This isn't like the Simod Cup where we had beaten top level clubs such as Chelsea and Coventry and were due to play League Cup finalists Luton.
IMHO the club would make more money from further progress in the FA Cup and that should be the immediate priority.
42,000 Peterbro v Wycombe
30,600 Rotherham v Sutton
85,000 (Record) Portsmouth v Sunderland
42,000 Lincoln v Shrewsbury
74,400 Coventry v Oxford
59,500 Barnsley v Oxford
72,300 Walsall v Bristol.C
That's an average of around 58,000.
The last two have been played between fairly smaller supported clubs hence the lower crowd. I would like to think that the draw of a Wembley visit against a half decent team and we would take 25,000+ to Wembley. Even if you take the average attendance of 58,000 that equates to nearly 1.8 million in gate receipts (based on a 30 pound ticket, so may be higher!). Not sure how much of that figure is shared between the clubs but nothing to be sniffed at.
I do suspect that the clubs don't get too much from the gate receipts but if it were as much as say £600,000 (including £50,000 or £100,000 depending upon the result) it is a tidy sum even if these earlier rounds may well have meant games being played at a loss.
By then hopefully we have a new owner and the pennies don't need to be watched quite so carefully as now.
For this 2nd round FA Cup there is a £50,000 differential between winning and losing which, at the moment is a lot of money to a club in our position.
We win and then winners in round 3 get £115,000 but more importantly gate receipts would be decent whoever and wherever we play.
So, do we put everything on the line for a number of games for our small squad that will only prove profitable if we get to the semi-final and much more so if we make the final or do we try to go as far as we can in the FA Cup knowing that just one win against significantly lower standard opposition will bring in significant funds during the next couple of months at least?
These are obviously decisions to be made by the club ( assuming that somebody is actually now making decisions) but I remain in the camp of treating the FA Cup very seriously and just giving it a go with the kids for the U21 trophy and hoping for the best and not too many injuries.
No date has been set, although the final group game - Bradford vs Rotherham will be played on Tuesday and will determine who's seeded. I imagine the draw will be in the days following.RG30 wrote:When is the draw?
The draw usually takes place at the end of November so I'd say it'd be w/c 25th November.Clyde1998 wrote:No date has been set, although the final group game - Bradford vs Rotherham will be played on Tuesday and will determine who's seeded. I imagine the draw will be in the days following.RG30 wrote:When is the draw?
Failing to avoid defeat at Cheltenham really cost the club a decent shot at progression in this competition.windermereROYAL wrote:Posh, Wycombe Charlton or Walsall away, we`ll know on Friday evening, nobody said it would be easy.
Assuming we'd directly have swapped with Cheltenham, we would've played one of Birmingham, Wimbledon, Cambridge or Stevenage at home - probably six or half a dozen in terms of the teams, but certainly would've been an improvement due to playing at home (unless we drew Birmingham).Sutekh wrote:Failing to avoid defeat at Cheltenham really cost the club a decent shot at progression in this competition.windermereROYAL wrote:Posh, Wycombe Charlton or Walsall away, we`ll know on Friday evening, nobody said it would be easy.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers and 141 guests