That's how lefty people think unfortunately. They don't realize we're not digging at the clubs we're against but slate how poorly we've been managed and ran over the yearsOrion1871 wrote:Not disrespectful at all. Never called them tinpot or said they didn't deserve to be in the same league as us. It was a dig at us and Dai rather than at them.
Do agree, don't currently rate Hunt and he's not doing anything to change my mind.Royal_jimmy wrote:Whilst appreciating managing us at the moment is a tough job I think Hunt's inexperience is showing. Started with the wrong team, WiFi should have started. Craig needs to move back into midfield he's no right back, get Yiadom back asap. Couldn't string passes together and too much long ball. No chances created again.
We're the same shit away from home but now looking weaker at home. We're only going one way, he needs a result at Burton or it's looking pretty toxic.
This is shape shifting the argument and denying what was really said. It's fine to say we shouldn't be getting comprehensive outplayed in L1 and it reflects poorly on Dai. That applies when it's Charlton, Bolton or Huddersfield too.Royal_jimmy wrote:That's how lefty people think unfortunately. They don't realize we're not digging at the clubs we're against but slate how poorly we've been managed and ran over the yearsOrion1871 wrote:Not disrespectful at all. Never called them tinpot or said they didn't deserve to be in the same league as us. It was a dig at us and Dai rather than at them.
ExactlyWestYorksRoyal wrote:This is shape shifting the argument and denying what was really said. It's fine to say we shouldn't be getting comprehensive outplayed in L1 and it reflects poorly on Dai. That applies when it's Charlton, Bolton or Huddersfield too.Royal_jimmy wrote:That's how lefty people think unfortunately. They don't realize we're not digging at the clubs we're against but slate how poorly we've been managed and ran over the yearsOrion1871 wrote:Not disrespectful at all. Never called them tinpot or said they didn't deserve to be in the same league as us. It was a dig at us and Dai rather than at them.
But the comment in question specifically called out their recent NL experience and the fact that they had played Maidenhead, as in we should be beating "teams like X". It's exactly the same as when teams bemoaned losing to "teams like Reading" when we were punching above our weight . It was disrespectful, just as it is when we say it now.
Hopefully he learns and improves. I really hope so and grows into the role but he has a long way to go. He'll steady the ship until we get a new owner but in the long term he's probably not worth his long contract.tidus_mi2 wrote:Do agree, don't currently rate Hunt and he's not doing anything to change my mind.Royal_jimmy wrote:Whilst appreciating managing us at the moment is a tough job I think Hunt's inexperience is showing. Started with the wrong team, WiFi should have started. Craig needs to move back into midfield he's no right back, get Yiadom back asap. Couldn't string passes together and too much long ball. No chances created again.
We're the same shit away from home but now looking weaker at home. We're only going one way, he needs a result at Burton or it's looking pretty toxic.
Last week we lost to a team that lost to Staines Town 15 years ago. In fact last season we lost twice to a Shrewsbury team that lost to Staines Town. Whilst on paper it sounds appalling it's a one off game and that was at that time.WestYorksRoyal wrote:This is shape shifting the argument and denying what was really said. It's fine to say we shouldn't be getting comprehensive outplayed in L1 and it reflects poorly on Dai. That applies when it's Charlton, Bolton or Huddersfield too.Royal_jimmy wrote:That's how lefty people think unfortunately. They don't realize we're not digging at the clubs we're against but slate how poorly we've been managed and ran over the yearsOrion1871 wrote:Not disrespectful at all. Never called them tinpot or said they didn't deserve to be in the same league as us. It was a dig at us and Dai rather than at them.
But the comment in question specifically called out their recent NL experience and the fact that they had played Maidenhead, as in we should be beating "teams like X". It's exactly the same as when teams bemoaned losing to "teams like Reading" when we were punching above our weight . It was disrespectful, just as it is when we say it now.
Its definitely a learning curve stepping up from U21's and he's been done last 2 games by experienced, tactically astute managers in Challinor and Wellens, the same as Bruce before Christmas.Royal_jimmy wrote:Hopefully he learns and improves. I really hope so and grows into the role but he has a long way to go. He'll steady the ship until we get a new owner but in the long term he's probably not worth his long contract.tidus_mi2 wrote:Do agree, don't currently rate Hunt and he's not doing anything to change my mind.Royal_jimmy wrote:Whilst appreciating managing us at the moment is a tough job I think Hunt's inexperience is showing. Started with the wrong team, WiFi should have started. Craig needs to move back into midfield he's no right back, get Yiadom back asap. Couldn't string passes together and too much long ball. No chances created again.
We're the same shit away from home but now looking weaker at home. We're only going one way, he needs a result at Burton or it's looking pretty toxic.
+1Hound wrote:I think we recognised Selles was doing a cracking job after his initial uselessness. He came in as a highly rated coach who had ‘something’ about him. He was definitely getting the best out of what we had
Hunt does seem to have gone back a more basic approach. I think it’ll be enough to keep us picking up points fairly regularly but can’t see us troubling the top 10 come the end of the season
Sadly I think we/Dai have let a very good manager through our fingers in Ruben
Spot on here.Crowbar6753 wrote:I understand each manager/coach has their preferred style of play but we've gone from playing fast attractive flowing passing football with an amazing high press with a team of youngsters to which it suited these guys well. Now we have ditched the high press, the football is slow and lethargic and we now seem to be playing hoof ball hoping that Smith can get on the end of something!!!
Their keeper didn't have a save to make all game!! without Mbengue our defense is poor and we look like shipping goals on most attacks, so basically we have to have an attacking threat otherwise we will never win. It doesn't help that Wing our best creator is off form and being played as a CDM.
Finally our passing is terrible, twice, Campbell was on the attack, stopped, played a ball backwards which was intercepted resulting in a goal.
Watch our game away at Brum and then compare it to todays game.....our high press and running with our youngsters scared teams to death and i'm sure teams were surprised and envious of our youngsters, now look at us the difference is night and day and its purely down to tactics.
And given they've spent more seasons in the top 2 tiers than we have, ignorant.Snowflake Royal wrote:ExactlyWestYorksRoyal wrote:This is shape shifting the argument and denying what was really said. It's fine to say we shouldn't be getting comprehensive outplayed in L1 and it reflects poorly on Dai. That applies when it's Charlton, Bolton or Huddersfield too.Royal_jimmy wrote:
That's how lefty people think unfortunately. They don't realize we're not digging at the clubs we're against but slate how poorly we've been managed and ran over the years
But the comment in question specifically called out their recent NL experience and the fact that they had played Maidenhead, as in we should be beating "teams like X". It's exactly the same as when teams bemoaned losing to "teams like Reading" when we were punching above our weight . It was disrespectful, just as it is when we say it now.
Pretty much the overwhelming reaction to the last two seasons is that they've been far more enjoyable. The team is vastly more likeable, the Academy is delivering. Signings are succeeding! We're top half despite being an absolute shambles behind the scenes.Royal_jimmy wrote:Last week we lost to a team that lost to Staines Town 15 years ago. In fact last season we lost twice to a Shrewsbury team that lost to Staines Town. Whilst on paper it sounds appalling it's a one off game and that was at that time.WestYorksRoyal wrote:This is shape shifting the argument and denying what was really said. It's fine to say we shouldn't be getting comprehensive outplayed in L1 and it reflects poorly on Dai. That applies when it's Charlton, Bolton or Huddersfield too.Royal_jimmy wrote:
That's how lefty people think unfortunately. They don't realize we're not digging at the clubs we're against but slate how poorly we've been managed and ran over the years
But the comment in question specifically called out their recent NL experience and the fact that they had played Maidenhead, as in we should be beating "teams like X". It's exactly the same as when teams bemoaned losing to "teams like Reading" when we were punching above our weight . It was disrespectful, just as it is when we say it now.
We have fallen a long way though and people saying relegation was a good thing are being proven why I told them to f off.
Yeah, mostly agree. But Selles lost 4-1 to Stockport this season. Our away form had actually picked up under Hunt until today.AthleticoSpizz wrote:+1Hound wrote:I think we recognised Selles was doing a cracking job after his initial uselessness. He came in as a highly rated coach who had ‘something’ about him. He was definitely getting the best out of what we had
Hunt does seem to have gone back a more basic approach. I think it’ll be enough to keep us picking up points fairly regularly but can’t see us troubling the top 10 come the end of the season
Sadly I think we/Dai have let a very good manager through our fingers in Ruben
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Larry_Parnell and 21 guests