It’s RJ - all par for the courseSnowflake Royal wrote:Anyone with any sort of decent view of the game and half a brain, whether there or watching remotely, could see that Blackpool were extremely organised in defence. Got men behind the ball and squeezed the space all around the edge of their box giving no passing lanes, no time and no room to do anything, while having big confident defenders able to deal with any cross.Royal_jimmy wrote:Blackpool weren't that great. It was just a typical midweek away performance from us. Did you travel from Cambridge? Any of the 270 away fans could see we weren't really in the contest at allSnowflake Royal wrote:Well played Blackpool, broke well, defended exceptionally well.
Stickland and Holzman aren't up to it, at least yet. But then that's hardly surprising for a 5/6/7/8 choice pair of centrebacks.
Blackpool are big, strong, quick and organised. Exactly the sort of team we struggle against.
There were no openings for through balls, pull backs or decent shots.
If you can't appreciate the quality of that defending and just think 'we were shit', I don't know what you're doing watching football. At the back we made a lot of unforced errors, but going forward we were completely blunted by Bruce's team.
Same old lefties think they're more educated and smarter than the rest....URZZZZ wrote:It’s RJ - all par for the courseSnowflake Royal wrote:Anyone with any sort of decent view of the game and half a brain, whether there or watching remotely, could see that Blackpool were extremely organised in defence. Got men behind the ball and squeezed the space all around the edge of their box giving no passing lanes, no time and no room to do anything, while having big confident defenders able to deal with any cross.Royal_jimmy wrote:
Blackpool weren't that great. It was just a typical midweek away performance from us. Did you travel from Cambridge? Any of the 270 away fans could see we weren't really in the contest at all
There were no openings for through balls, pull backs or decent shots.
If you can't appreciate the quality of that defending and just think 'we were shit', I don't know what you're doing watching football. At the back we made a lot of unforced errors, but going forward we were completely blunted by Bruce's team.
Don’t entirely agree mind, certainly not in the first half (different story once they’d gone ahead). Campbell got behind a couple of times, one where Knibbs got in his way and another where he cut it back for Knibbs’ deflected shot. Neat move on the edge of the box where Wing had a simple through ball for Ehibhatiomhan to put him through. Whilst they did defend well, we did have half chances to go ahead, poor end product/decision making (Campbell particuarly guilty) letting us down
Really do need to stop starting Ehibhatiomhan in these games. He never plays well against a crowded defence. His asset is when he’s isolated one on one against his respective defender, not the intricacies in breaking them down. Campbell and Camara get plenty more flak but IMO we look a better side when those two are in the side. 1 defeat in 16 when Camara starts
Yeah, was mainly talking about when they went ahead and played 11 behind the ball. First half was more open.URZZZZ wrote:It’s RJ - all par for the courseSnowflake Royal wrote:Anyone with any sort of decent view of the game and half a brain, whether there or watching remotely, could see that Blackpool were extremely organised in defence. Got men behind the ball and squeezed the space all around the edge of their box giving no passing lanes, no time and no room to do anything, while having big confident defenders able to deal with any cross.Royal_jimmy wrote:
Blackpool weren't that great. It was just a typical midweek away performance from us. Did you travel from Cambridge? Any of the 270 away fans could see we weren't really in the contest at all
There were no openings for through balls, pull backs or decent shots.
If you can't appreciate the quality of that defending and just think 'we were shit', I don't know what you're doing watching football. At the back we made a lot of unforced errors, but going forward we were completely blunted by Bruce's team.
Don’t entirely agree mind, certainly not in the first half (different story once they’d gone ahead). Campbell got behind a couple of times, one where Knibbs got in his way and another where he cut it back for Knibbs’ deflected shot. Neat move on the edge of the box where Wing had a simple through ball for Ehibhatiomhan to put him through. Whilst they did defend well, we did have half chances to go ahead, poor end product/decision making (Campbell particuarly guilty) letting us down
Really do need to stop starting Ehibhatiomhan in these games. He never plays well against a crowded defence. His asset is when he’s isolated one on one against his respective defender, not the intricacies in breaking them down. Campbell and Camara get plenty more flak but IMO we look a better side when those two are in the side. 1 defeat in 16 when Camara starts
oddly, we have precedent on thisscumbag wrote:I'm looking forward to the pitch invasion when we finish 7th.
And how very embarrassing it was too.stealthpapes wrote:scumbag wrote:I'm looking forward to the pitch invasion when we finish 7th.
oddly, we have precedent on this
I thought my eyes must have been deceiving me but clearly not. Abysmal officiating there by the AR and ref!Snowflake Royal wrote:Jesus,how is Fletcher not interfering with play, he literally body checks Rushesha away from being able to challenge for the ball.
And with Bindon and Mbengue out as well is a bad combinationOrion1871 wrote:That's what happens when you sell your best striker and replace him with a trier who's not got that little bit of quality you need and a lad who's more comfortable on the wing.Sutekh wrote:Reading are so ineffective in front of goal. Still no shots on target. Blackpool keeper might as well not be there.
And here comes the usual collapse at Blackpool.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 238 guests