Yes, couple of times he actually managed to cover by being able to runBrogue wrote:Ward looks the business
A few more games and he should become fairly key to the set up.
Yes, couple of times he actually managed to cover by being able to runBrogue wrote:Ward looks the business
Jesus X - a yo yo team? I wish. Some fans are really so self entitled it makes you weep.traff wrote:“Turgid” is the word that comes to mind watching this team.
It really feels like we are being turned into a yo-yo northern club, à la Rotherham, bouncing between League One and the Championship while playing boring, attritional football.
Personally, I would rather see us play attractive football and just miss out on promotion than battle at the bottom end of the Championship playing this unimaginative, formulaic dross, i.e., picking the wrong-lane Paddy over Young or anyone else for that matter. WTF!
I am not a Reading supporter because I expect us to be hunting trophies every season. I just want to be entertained.
I predict that excitement and creativity will be very Leamited while Richardson is in charge.
Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.Royals and Racers wrote:359 Royals fans made the trip.
Fairest play ever, was the brave 13 or so who, under the great days of Bullivant, went to Stockport to witness a 5-1 embarrassment on a Tuesday.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.Royals and Racers wrote:359 Royals fans made the trip.
traff wrote:“Turgid” is the word that comes to mind watching this team.
It really feels like we are being turned into a yo-yo northern club, à la Rotherham, bouncing between League One and the Championship while playing boring, attritional football.
Personally, I would rather see us play attractive football and just miss out on promotion than battle at the bottom end of the Championship playing this unimaginative, formulaic dross, i.e., picking the wrong-lane Paddy over Young or anyone else for that matter. WTF!
I am not a Reading supporter because I expect us to be hunting trophies every season. I just want to be entertained.
I predict that excitement and creativity will be very Leamited while Richardson is in charge.
Maybe those 13 went to Wigan last night tooSutekh wrote:Fairest play ever, was the brave 13 or so who, under the great days of Bullivant, went to Stockport to witness a 5-1 embarrassment on a Tuesday.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.Royals and Racers wrote:359 Royals fans made the trip.
Discount my son and his mate, they only made the trip across from Salford.....SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.Royals and Racers wrote:359 Royals fans made the trip.
Noted.Wycombe Royal wrote:Discount my son and his mate, they only made the trip across from Salford.....SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.Royals and Racers wrote:359 Royals fans made the trip.
You see I don't watch any of that so it all looks ok to me! I only watch Reading and BrackleyArmadillo Roadkill wrote:It was hardly a game to make the neutral fall in love with football was it? Maybe I’ve been watching too much PL, CL and Serie A games recently, because that really was dire.
But, Dorsett is coming along really well. He’s all round a lot more solid and there are fewer of the silly mistakes that blighted him earlier. The goals are a very welcome bonus.
Ward looked class. He’s got real pace, aggression and anticipation. Made one howler that came to nothing, thankfully. I expect he will just get better as he settles in.
I appreciate Doyle’s application and work rate. At least he was full of ideas.
Nyambe seems determined to make life difficult by always turning into trouble. I’m really not convinced by him.
How many times does Wing try and make a thirty metre pass that just goes directly to the opposition? If we can be said to have a style of play, then Wing’s long passes to lose possession are probably it.
Think you’re being a little harsh on Doyle, progressed well after a disappointing start. Picks up pockets of space well and is often the “link” from defence to attack on the occasions we do put together a moveHound wrote:Ward did look good. Aggressive as well. Couple of mistakes but lots of potential
It was a shame not to see Young. Lane, Doyle and Ritchie all too similar and just don’t do enough for me. Would play one of those plus Kelvin and Young. Think we’d be a far more interesting watch
We don’t look miles off it. Some nice stuff at times but it all slows down when we get to the final third
More like frustrations with the general lack of creativity and inability to hold onto the ball in the final third for any length of time rather than expectations of scintillating passing football. Still really need a Quinn or Morley type that can be a focus point and hold the ball up as well as being lethal in front of goal (something for the summer hopefully).bcubed wrote:You see I don't watch any of that so it all looks ok to me! I only watch Reading and BrackleyArmadillo Roadkill wrote:It was hardly a game to make the neutral fall in love with football was it? Maybe I’ve been watching too much PL, CL and Serie A games recently, because that really was dire.
But, Dorsett is coming along really well. He’s all round a lot more solid and there are fewer of the silly mistakes that blighted him earlier. The goals are a very welcome bonus.
Ward looked class. He’s got real pace, aggression and anticipation. Made one howler that came to nothing, thankfully. I expect he will just get better as he settles in.
I appreciate Doyle’s application and work rate. At least he was full of ideas.
Nyambe seems determined to make life difficult by always turning into trouble. I’m really not convinced by him.
How many times does Wing try and make a thirty metre pass that just goes directly to the opposition? If we can be said to have a style of play, then Wing’s long passes to lose possession are probably it.
Do a lot of our fans have unreasonable expectations?
Does anyone know a Pompey fan who can explain how they got end product out of Lane.URZZZZ wrote:Think you’re being a little harsh on Doyle, progressed well after a disappointing start. Picks up pockets of space well and is often the “link” from defence to attack on the occasions we do put together a moveHound wrote:Ward did look good. Aggressive as well. Couple of mistakes but lots of potential
It was a shame not to see Young. Lane, Doyle and Ritchie all too similar and just don’t do enough for me. Would play one of those plus Kelvin and Young. Think we’d be a far more interesting watch
We don’t look miles off it. Some nice stuff at times but it all slows down when we get to the final third
Particularly in away games where there’s a bit more space to play in. 3 assists in his last 3 away games, a goal at Plymouth, a goal at Blackpool, all within the space of just over a couple of months
There are reasons for Kelvin to start, for a degree of physicality (especially with Keane injured) and due to the non existent contribution of the likes of Lane but I think he has a better impact off the bench and our options to “change” things would look quite limited if he started as a bench of Lane and Ritchie as our attacking options would be poor
I was one of those, but I sat in the stand watching the other 12 get drenched behind the goalSutekh wrote:Fairest play ever, was the brave 13 or so who, under the great days of Bullivant, went to Stockport to witness a 5-1 embarrassment on a Tuesday.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.Royals and Racers wrote:359 Royals fans made the trip.
No I didn't.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Maybe those 13 went to Wigan last night tooSutekh wrote:Fairest play ever, was the brave 13 or so who, under the great days of Bullivant, went to Stockport to witness a 5-1 embarrassment on a Tuesday.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:
Fair play to them. Tuesday night away in February to watch Wigan vs Reading.
Ok.MR. CYNICAL wrote:No I didn't.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Maybe those 13 went to Wigan last night tooSutekh wrote:
Fairest play ever, was the brave 13 or so who, under the great days of Bullivant, went to Stockport to witness a 5-1 embarrassment on a Tuesday.
Lane played on the left for pompey… square pegs round holes at Reading.Sutekh wrote:Does anyone know a Pompey fan who can explain how they got end product out of Lane.URZZZZ wrote:Think you’re being a little harsh on Doyle, progressed well after a disappointing start. Picks up pockets of space well and is often the “link” from defence to attack on the occasions we do put together a moveHound wrote:Ward did look good. Aggressive as well. Couple of mistakes but lots of potential
It was a shame not to see Young. Lane, Doyle and Ritchie all too similar and just don’t do enough for me. Would play one of those plus Kelvin and Young. Think we’d be a far more interesting watch
We don’t look miles off it. Some nice stuff at times but it all slows down when we get to the final third
Particularly in away games where there’s a bit more space to play in. 3 assists in his last 3 away games, a goal at Plymouth, a goal at Blackpool, all within the space of just over a couple of months
There are reasons for Kelvin to start, for a degree of physicality (especially with Keane injured) and due to the non existent contribution of the likes of Lane but I think he has a better impact off the bench and our options to “change” things would look quite limited if he started as a bench of Lane and Ritchie as our attacking options would be poor
He seems to have a good workrate but just doesn’t seem to effectively contribute anything much despite this.
Actually I took that as fact after reading it on the wimbledon match thread after someone posted it. A quick google suggests he was primarily played on the right so scrap that. But he is left footed… perhaps we should give him a go on the left and bin off this inverted winger shiteBrogue wrote:Lane played on the left for pompey… square pegs round holes at Reading.Sutekh wrote:Does anyone know a Pompey fan who can explain how they got end product out of Lane.URZZZZ wrote:
Think you’re being a little harsh on Doyle, progressed well after a disappointing start. Picks up pockets of space well and is often the “link” from defence to attack on the occasions we do put together a move
Particularly in away games where there’s a bit more space to play in. 3 assists in his last 3 away games, a goal at Plymouth, a goal at Blackpool, all within the space of just over a couple of months
There are reasons for Kelvin to start, for a degree of physicality (especially with Keane injured) and due to the non existent contribution of the likes of Lane but I think he has a better impact off the bench and our options to “change” things would look quite limited if he started as a bench of Lane and Ritchie as our attacking options would be poor
He seems to have a good workrate but just doesn’t seem to effectively contribute anything much despite this.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1009 guests