Make your mind up Royal Rother, did you enjoy it or not?Royal Rother wrote:And you think of yourself as a football fan?LUX wrote:Tilehurst Mike wrote:
As for Arsenal, thats the best display of attacking, team football I ever have seen against a Reading side. Its a shame more fans didn't stay until the end to clap both teams off the field and acknowledge Arsenal's peformance.
You are joking.
No it's not a shame.
Yes Arsenal were very very good and they stuffed us. In answer to RR's question, no it gave me no pleasure to see that Arsenal display.
I admired / enjoyed Arsenal's display immensely, but did not enjoy the fact that we were thrashed.Schards#2 wrote:Make your mind up Royal Rother, did you enjoy it or not?
I agree, looking back, yes we were second best in every department yesterday and we were a million miles away from Arsenal yesterday.Schards#2 wrote:Make your mind up Royal Rother, did you enjoy it or not?Royal Rother wrote:And you think of yourself as a football fan?LUX wrote:
You are joking.
No it's not a shame.
Yes Arsenal were very very good and they stuffed us. In answer to RR's question, no it gave me no pleasure to see that Arsenal display.
I'm with LUX on this one, whilst I can admire Arsenal's superb football, I would draw the line at enjoying it as, being an unashamedly partizan fan, I can't enjoy seeing a game where we didn't remotely compete.
It was too one sided to be a classic game, more an exhibition.
Pathetic.readingbedding wrote:Of course, Arsenal played fantastic, but posting a gushing post about the qualities of Arsenal after a 4-0 battering is an obvious post from a Gooner but not from a Reading fan.
Not quite what I menat since the Chelsea match had the lot as you say, in fact it was a thrilling TV spectacle (on Sky, not MOTD)LUX wrote:I disagree with Uke. (Putting the distasteful goalkeeper injuries and the aftermath aside) I far preferred the Chelsea game. Why? Because we rattled Chelsea, deserved a draw, lost by only one (lucky deflected) goal and generally gave a great account of ourselves on live national TV (not MOTD, because they concentrated on the injuries)
I thought this was a reference to the Chelsea game?Uke wrote: unlike the pain of watching Reading lose 1-0 to a scrappy match with a fluke deflection goal.
It wasLUX wrote:I thought this was a reference to the Chelsea game?Uke wrote: unlike the pain of watching Reading lose 1-0 to a scrappy match with a fluke deflection goal.
ps watched both games on SKY.
it's easy to play like that when the opposition doesn't compete.Royal Rother wrote:Fantastic!
When Arsenal play like that it really is the beautiful game.
The best football ever seen at Reading.
Hopefully we can learn from it and aspire to add a few of their moves to our game. In fact there were a few signs in the last 10 minutes of us doing just that so I look forward to some lovely one touch, pass into space (not to feet) football in the coming weeks!!
Especially one called 'Now that's what I call Football...'Royal Rother wrote:Pathetic.readingbedding wrote:Of course, Arsenal played fantastic, but posting a gushing post about the qualities of Arsenal after a 4-0 battering is an obvious post from a Gooner but not from a Reading fan.
True, you can't really moan at Coppell for trying to play football against one of the best footballing teams in Europe.LUX wrote:I disagree with Uke. (Putting the distasteful goalkeeper injuries and the aftermath aside) I far preferred the Chelsea game. Why? Because we rattled Chelsea, deserved a draw, lost by only one (lucky deflected) goal and generally gave a great account of ourselves on live national TV (not MOTD, because they concentrated on the injuries).
I'd be the same with England. If we lost a key game to a brilliant Dutch display with Van Persie, Robben and van Nistelroy scoring "sweet" goals, I would not (metaphorically) stand and applaud the bar stads.
ps I've really got no problems with Arsenal winning the League if they play like that, blah blah, but they will not/do not. It was a one-off (OK they'll have half a dozen other performances like that, against relegation-fodder teams).
you've just cheered me up, Gordon.Gordons Cumming wrote:I think the whole experience against Arsenal may have made other teams underestimate us again.
Hopefully.
sorry GC..all I can find on Arsenal v Reading goals is Robin van Percie's 'Friday Goal'Gordons Cumming wrote:I was hoping to see them on the internet maybe.Al Fresco wrote:might be able to catch them on Sky sometime todays perhaps?Gordons Cumming wrote:Anyone know where I can see the goals from the game?
spot on, everything played along the ground.Royal Rother wrote:The contrast between the football played by Arsenal and that played by Man Utd and Chelsea is illustrated by Sonko's performances. He hardly got a defensive header in against Arsenal because they never put it in the air.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], englishman in VLC, Google [Bot], windermereROYAL and 121 guests