No, there wasn't, you fool.West Stand Man wrote:There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy.
No, there wasn't, you fool.West Stand Man wrote:There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy.
Blackadder comes to mindWest Stand Man wrote:YupRhys The Royal wrote:And youve seen the reverse angle?West Stand Man wrote: Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
No, you havn't.West Stand Man wrote:YupRhys The Royal wrote:And youve seen the reverse angle?West Stand Man wrote: Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
but the contact was about 5 seconds before the dive and clearly not enough to even nudge mcarthy, and when he did dive he was a yard away from sonko.West Stand Man wrote:At last bcubed, you are coming along woth me and accepting the facts? It is painfully clear that there was some contact, whether it was enough to cause the dramatic collapse that resulted is arguable - but as you say - the facts are there and if you wish to continue your Blackadder-like pigheadedness that is fine by me.
Remember - my superiority is totally based on being superior.
Exactly.brendywendy wrote:but the contact was about 5 seconds before the dive and clearly not enough to even nudge mcarthy, and when he did dive he was a yard away from sonko.West Stand Man wrote:At last bcubed, you are coming along woth me and accepting the facts? It is painfully clear that there was some contact, whether it was enough to cause the dramatic collapse that resulted is arguable - but as you say - the facts are there and if you wish to continue your Blackadder-like pigheadedness that is fine by me.
Remember - my superiority is totally based on being superior.
as a defender, if i touch the bloke at half time, and at the end of the match he dives, surely it doesnt count
West Stand Man wrote:I think we are all agreed there then. Contact yes, penalty no. We can argue to the death over the fall or the dive (and I challenge you to try it - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
I think we are all agreed that the fall was exagerated.
Spaecruiser and bcubed seem out on a limb claiming no contact at all - but that fits the usual quality of their observational powers. My daughter is still on hand to offer appointments at D&A if required.
You have obviously never played any contact sport or you'd understand what I am saying.brendywendy wrote:West Stand Man wrote: - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
quote]
honestly
shut up
are you blind
i play and have played many contact sportWest Stand Man wrote:brendywendy wrote:You have obviously never played any contact sport or you'd understand what I am saying.West Stand Man wrote: - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
quote]
honestly
shut up
are you blind
ps, actually I have outstanding eyesight . It is superior - of course.
brendywendy wrote:West Stand Man wrote:i play and have played many contact sports, and i understand you whitterings quite well, they are just wrong.brendywendy wrote: You have obviously never played any contact sport or you'd understand what I am saying.
ps, actually I have outstanding eyesight . It is superior - of course.
and i have never seen or heard of a huge and spontaneaous lateral movement of the leg as a result of, and 5 seconds after being brushed by someones clothing.
you may well have outstanding eyesight, but you are talking rubbish
please shh
Users browsing this forum: Fox Talbot, From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers, Semrush [Bot], Yellowcoat2 and 335 guests