Except that your Shorey quote is wrong. He didn't say that he is a Wet Sham fan and the article is wrong about him being a "life-long fan" of Wet Sham.rotherwick_royal wrote:Also on SSN:
http://home.skysports.com/transferartic ... lid=477546
The worrying thing is the two different angles that Lita and Shorey are coming from....
Lita: "I'm happy at Reading"
Shorey: "I'm a West Ham fan and flattered by their interest, we'll have to wait and see"
Newpaper talk I know and maybe nothing new from two weeks ago, I just wish RFC would sort out his contract pronto.
They still would need Shorey in person to sign anything!BR2 wrote:Spacey,
The fact that he is in Korea is irrelevant.
The agent will be doing the negotiations.
It could well be that the agent has authority to accept an offer from us of say £25,000 but if that is not forthcoming his instructions may be to find out what anybody else will offer and that could include West Ham.
One worry is that West Ham have sold Konchesky for a ludicrously high amount so may offer big bucks for our Nicky-I hope not as decent left backs are few and far between.
It would be easy to turn down if Shorey wants to stay. Reading don't need the money as from all reports, they must be awash with cash having spent so little.runrunrunrungilksey wrote:Reported 5 Million on SSN - Would this be to hard to turn down for the board?
But he still has two years left on his contract, surely we can still play him for another year before selling him if he wants to go.Binfield Royal wrote:If Shorey says to Reading, "I think I fancy a change" then, having learned the hard way on the Sidwell saga, I suspect they would take the cash and get very busy looking for a replacement.
What did they learn the hard way ?Binfield Royal wrote:If Shorey says to Reading, "I think I fancy a change" then, having learned the hard way on the Sidwell saga, I suspect they would take the cash and get very busy looking for a replacement.
West Ham going about things the wrong way again - no real surprise !size 12 wrote:I work in E London, and a colleague of mine subscribes to the West Ham Text Messaging service. He received a text today advising that West Ham are very interested in Shorey
I hope wages don't prove to be the motivating factor
I would say what they learnt was not to try and keep your best players on the cheap.Behindu wrote:What did they learn the hard way ?Binfield Royal wrote:If Shorey says to Reading, "I think I fancy a change" then, having learned the hard way on the Sidwell saga, I suspect they would take the cash and get very busy looking for a replacement.
It looked like we had a pretty clear idea what was going on throught the Sidwell scenario. It wasn't an 'accident' that we chose not to cash in early and there was a fairly obvious strategy in place.
Whether the same approach would be taken again I'm not sure, but then the Shorey scenario is very different.
That assumes :Binfield Royal wrote:I would say what they learnt was not to try and keep your best players on the cheap.Behindu wrote:What did they learn the hard way ?Binfield Royal wrote:If Shorey says to Reading, "I think I fancy a change" then, having learned the hard way on the Sidwell saga, I suspect they would take the cash and get very busy looking for a replacement.
It looked like we had a pretty clear idea what was going on throught the Sidwell scenario. It wasn't an 'accident' that we chose not to cash in early and there was a fairly obvious strategy in place.
Whether the same approach would be taken again I'm not sure, but then the Shorey scenario is very different.
At the beginning of last season, Sidwell was offered a new deal of (allegedly) £15K a week. He wanted £18K and the club said no.
By the end, they were offering him £25K a week to stay but he had already had his head turned by agents and promises of much more in wages (which he got from Chelsea).
Therefore, the lesson must be - pay your top existing players what they're worth because if not, someone else will.
If we did that, then we'd be bankrupt! There is a wage structure for a reason.Binfield Royal wrote:Therefore, the lesson must be - pay your top existing players what they're worth because if not, someone else will.
he may well leave - too get more cash - and if so good luck to him I say - but "disgusted with the lack of ambition and progress over the summer" sounds like your opion and not his to meDaniella wrote:I have it on very good authority from a reliable source that shorey is on his way. He's said to be disgusted with the lack of ambition and progress over the summer, and has said that he will be looking to join a more established club with a more secure future.
So with shorey on his way, where does that leave the team? Is golbourne ready to step up? He was quite impressive pre-season so i'm not too worried really. What are your thoughts?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests